Re: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone?

of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:                 Subject:        Re: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone? Do you mean Oracle attorney actually sued you before??? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Sent: Monday, December

RE: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone?

I am sorry. De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de [EMAIL PROTECTED]Enviado el: martes, 16 de diciembre de 2003 0:34Para: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LAsunto: RE: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone? MetaLink is an official Oracle support mechanism for paid

Re: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone?

Do you mean Oracle attorney actually sued you before??? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 18:34 Subject: RE: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone? MetaLink is an official

RE: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone?

44 AM  Please respond to ORACLE-L                 To:        Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:                 Subject:        RE: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone?   I have a system with RH AS 2.1 in production and is very very fast and reliable. Th

RE: RedHat Advanced Server v3.0, anyone?

  I have a system with RH AS 2.1 in production and is very very fast and reliable. The server is a Proliant with 8GB RAM and 2x Intel Xeon. Oracle installation was easy, only take care if you have big memory. Also remenber to update the kernel. The predetermined don´t let start database.  

Re: redhat/oracle

On Tuesday 04 November 2003 18:29, Stahlke, Mark wrote: > I'll second that recommendation for Gentoo. I'm running Oracle 9.2.0.3 on > my > Gentoo based laptop and I just installed OWB on it too. > > Installing Gentoo can take a long time but once it's done you'll have a > sweet system. Hello List

Re: redhat/oracle

Akshally, it's a pity Oracle stopped support for Apple's Unix. My 7.0 version for Apple's A/UX was one of the most stable and solid ports I ever played with. If anything, OSX is even more solid and better performing than A/UX ever was. Oh yes, the Finder desktop running inside Unix was NO

Re: redhat/oracle

Would you like a multiple choice answer or is it not obvious? ;) Cheers Nuno Souto [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - > so now that Linux has "made it" are we going to have a Linux provider melt > down? with no open source/free versions left? -- Please see the official ORACLE-L

Re: redhat/oracle

Orr, Steve wrote: Ditto. (But what about OS X? :) I keep asking my boss for a powerbookG4, but he won't bite for some reason ;). I keep telling him I "need" one to "test" the development version of Oracle on OSX. I use the Ximian Evolution interface to MS Exchange. The problems are: MS Outlook ru

RE: redhat/oracle

Ditto. (But what about OS X? :) Got Oracle9.2 server and client running on my RH9 desktop. Found the following link somewhat informative even though there are some weirdities: http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/4141 Got the RH9 desktop machine a couple of weeks ago but am still struggling to get fre

RE: redhat/oracle

                To:        Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:                 Subject:        RE: redhat/oracleMary,   This topic is better handled over at /. than here. (http://slashdot.org). RedHat should have communicated more effectively that they are ind

RE: redhat/oracle

Paul Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  11/04/2003 01:19 PM  Please respond to ORACLE-L                 To:        Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:                 Subject:        RE: redhat/oracle Mary,   This topic is be

Re: redhat/oracle

Hmmm, equally tragic: www.fakednews.com was shut down. I wanted to create a little spoof for this group about Red Hat being bought by Microsoft and starting to work on the new enterprise version of Linux called Longnose, which would blend Linux with the unique Windows ability to propagate vi

RE: redhat/oracle

LE-LSubject: RE: redhat/oracle   Debian. http://www.debian.org/social_contract   "Thater, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Testa scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon:> And now novell is eating up Suse, http://www.slashdot.org 8:45A> today. > > joeso now t

Re: redhat/oracle

> AFAIK, you can download RH AS, just not is ISO form. The RPM's are available on > their FTP site. To be precise, SRPMs are available on ftp site... Tanel. -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Tanel Poder INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Servic

RE: redhat/oracle

Actually the Novell initiative probably has the best shot. With Novell now owning NDS, Ximian Gnome, and SuSE they have a good combination for success. That's assuming boneheadded management decisions don't screw it up. The technology is there. On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 11:24, Boivin, Patrice J wro

RE: redhat/oracle

Will Oracle 9iR2 run on fedora do you think? Tonight I will check from home where I can download Fedora from, I am a little fed up with XP's memory management (that half kernel, half user process nonsense). Patrice -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:24 PM To: Multiple

RE: redhat/oracle

From: Brian Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:34 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: Re: redhat/oracle > > > Thater, William wrote: > > so now that Linux has "made it" are we going to have a > Linux provi

Re: redhat/oracle

Boivin, Patrice J wrote: I am still curious to see when linux will make it on the desktop, despite the hype now we know that Red Hat is dropping that initiative. Patrice. As far as I'm concerned, it has already made it. It's my primary desktop at work,with windows for those pesky apps that only

Re: redhat/oracle

Thater, William wrote: so now that Linux has "made it" are we going to have a Linux provider melt down? with no open source/free versions left? I doubt it. Redhat or any other company can't "lock up" GPL'd software. The only thing they can keep you from copying/distributing is any proprietary

Re: redhat/oracle

Jonathan, i got the developer version of RHAS 2.1 on CD, if you dont find it downloadable(which unless you paid for it, i dont think you can), let me know, i'll burn copies and send out to ya. joe Jonathan Gennick wrote: Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 11:49:33 AM, Hately, Mike (LogicaCMG) ([EMAIL

RE: redhat/oracle

/0,4902,86827,00.html?nlid=AM       -Original Message- From: Paul Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:35 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: redhat/oracle   Debian. http://www.debian.org/social_contract   "Thater, William&quo

RE: redhat/oracle

Debian. http://www.debian.org/social_contract   "Thater, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Testa scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon:> And now novell is eating up Suse, http://www.slashdot.org 8:45A> today. > > joeso now that Linux has "made it" are we going to have a Linux provider meltd

Re: redhat/oracle

.. Rich Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA > -Original Message- > From: Mladen Gogala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:59 PM > To: Multiple recipi

RE: redhat/oracle

tem/Database Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA > -Original Message- > From: Mladen Gogala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:59 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: Re: redhat/oracle

RE: redhat/oracle

I am still curious to see when linux will make it on the desktop, despite the hype now we know that Red Hat is dropping that initiative. Patrice. -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:14 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Joe Testa scribbled on the wall in glit

RE: redhat/oracle

; -Original Message- > From: Mladen Gogala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:59 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: Re: redhat/oracle > > > I'll try my luck with SuSE. It apparently has IBM support. Red Hat is &

RE: redhat/oracle

Joe Testa scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon: > And now novell is eating up Suse, http://www.slashdot.org 8:45A > today. > > joe so now that Linux has "made it" are we going to have a Linux provider melt down? with no open source/free versions left? -- Bill "Shrek" Thater ORACLE DB

RE: redhat/oracle

Novell? Now there's a company that doesn't have a clue. Let's see, they bought Cambridge Technology Parters to ummm let Jack Messman run Novell??? If I'm wrong maybe it's because I Don't Know Jack (http://www.novell.com/info/forms/wwsmc2001/jak.html) Henry -Original Message- Joe Test

RE: redhat/oracle

Hope this is not getting too off topic, but I thought this may also be of interest to those reading this thread: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/33770.html "Novell bags SuSE for $210m Linux company SuSE was today acquired by Novell in a $210 million all-cash deal. The transaction is subj

RE: redhat/oracle

Agree with you Ramon E. Estevez [EMAIL PROTECTED] 809-535-8994 -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:55 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I suspect that Oracle will continue to support RH AS. That is the only version they ever supported officially. So the

RE: redhat/oracle

This just came in on the suse-oracle-announce mail list: >Dear SUSE Oracle customers, > >SUSE LINUX is to be aquired by Novell: > > >We will of course continue our Enterprise Server product line and our >close relationship with Oracle

Re: redhat/oracle

What I dont like about Suse is no ISOs unless you're willing to pay for the software. maybe i'll just buy the WS version and write it off on my taxes to run oracle on., hmm blah. joe Rodd Holman wrote: I suspect that Oracle will continue to support RH AS. That is the only version they

Re: redhat/oracle

And now novell is eating up Suse, http://www.slashdot.org 8:45A today. joe Rodd Holman wrote: I suspect that Oracle will continue to support RH AS. That is the only version they ever supported officially. So the pay status of RH and Oracle is a moot point. However, those of us who play with

RE: redhat/oracle

No. But the free download of RH9 looks to end in March 04. Then there will only be the three pay versions starting at USD $179.00. All support for previous versions is GONE. Sounds like another Micro$oft in the birthing stage. Rodd On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 03:24, Mark Leith wrote: > OK, this is

Re: redhat/oracle

I suspect that Oracle will continue to support RH AS. That is the only version they ever supported officially. So the pay status of RH and Oracle is a moot point. However, those of us who play with it knew that with a couple of adjustments it would run on the free version. What will happen ther

Re: redhat/oracle

For the time being there are Linux ISO'S at http://www.linuxiso.org/ including the RED HAT consumer linux. Ron >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/03/2003 10:44:27 PM >>> Well, if RedHat starts exhibitting tendencies of becoming another Microsoft, there are Mandrake, Debian , SuSE and (don't shoot, I'm just

RE: redhat/oracle

And more in the thread: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=12481 "RED HAT has told its customers that it will no longer support a version of Linux for the desktop, signalling that it believes its enterprise products stand more chance of bringing in the shekels. The firm emailed its customers yes

RE: redhat/oracle

As well as Redhat Enterprise Linux, there will be a free version called fedora. See http://fedora.redhat.com formore information. Eddie Watkins The Moray Council -Original Message- Sent: 04 November 2003 09:24 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L OK, this is even more confusing t

RE: redhat/oracle

OK, this is even more confusing to me. According to the following page: http://www.redhat.com/download/products.html "You can download Red Hat Linux for free from http://ftp.redhat.com or ftp://ftp.redhat.com. To access the Red Hat FTP site, use anonymous as you user name and your email address a

Re: redhat/oracle

I'll try my luck with SuSE. It apparently has IBM support. Red Hat is starting to act badly and brings memories of one former Xenix reseller which made fortune by selling operating system written by IBM. On 2003.11.03 23:24, Jared Still wrote: This is news to me. RH will no longer let you download

Re: redhat/oracle

This is news to me. RH will no longer let you download Linux for free? hmmm Sure enough, look at http://www.redhat.com/apps/commerce/rhel/ws/ The cheapest version is $179.00 US. Looks like the next version for me will be Gentoo. Jared On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 17:54, Joe Testa wrote: > Well w

Re: redhat/oracle

Well, if RedHat starts exhibitting tendencies of becoming another Microsoft, there are Mandrake, Debian , SuSE and (don't shoot, I'm just kidding) SCO. (duck, and quickly) On 2003.11.03 20:54, Joe Testa wrote: Well with RH latest ordeal of jumping out of simple ISOs and basically no more free sof

RE: RedHat AS Dev edition still available today THANK YOU Ron !

ECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003 14:30 An: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Betreff: Re: RedHat AS Dev edition still available today Milen, The offer is still available at https://rhn.redhat.com/network/sales/index.pxt you must have a RedHat network login, Easy to get on line

RE: RedHat AS Dev edition

lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 16. Juni 2003 18:20 An: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Betreff: Re: RedHat AS Dev edition Melin, Talking to the REdHat support people and the Dev edition was pulled last week some time. If on the "buy it" page you see the RedHat AS De

Re: RedHat AS Dev edition

Melin, Talking to the REdHat support people and the Dev edition was pulled last week some time. If on the "buy it" page you see the RedHat AS Developers edition you can still purchase it and download the ISO's with a login and password. Ron >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/03 05:09PM >>> Hallo list,

Re: RedHat 8.0

Oracle use it's own jre. Comes with the install package and installs as part of the software package. You probably have an unrelated DISPLAY or X server problem. -- Lyndon Tiu Quoting "Odland, Brad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Anyone messing with RedHat 8.0 and Oracle 9.2..? > > I've got 9.2.0.2.

Re: RedHat 8.0

I run that config pretty successfully but I dont believe in java(its a religious thing, bwahahaha) and really only use that config for backup/recovery RMAN testing. joe > Anyone messing with RedHat 8.0 and Oracle 9.2..? > > I've got 9.2.0.2.0 database running on 8.0, most of the Java utilit

RE: RedHat

Maybe we should birth a new catch phrase - DAFGS (Do a **Fine** Google Search) -Original Message- Wells Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:14 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Actually... I thought it was rather good. -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:

RE: RedHat

Actually... I thought it was rather good. -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:14 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L LOL - Mladen, you are bad! -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:04 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L On 2002.0

RE: RedHat

I know. That's my nature. I even advised a young lady from LA to do the same. > -Original Message- > From: Mercadante, Thomas F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:14 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: RE: RedHat >

RE: RedHat

LOL - Mladen, you are bad! -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:04 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L On 2002.05.23 02:23 Santosh Varma wrote: > I wanted to know what is this RedHat, its significance and its > features. Any > links/doc's on that ??? > Thanks and

Re: RedHat

-- Santosh Varma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I wanted to know what is this RedHat, its significance and its features. > Any links/doc's on that ??? It is the most common "corporate" Linux distribution out there. The people at RH worked with Oracle, IBM, Sybase, and other package vendors to help them

Re: RedHat

On 2002.05.23 02:23 Santosh Varma wrote: > I wanted to know what is this RedHat, its significance and its > features. Any > links/doc's on that ??? > Thanks and regards, > > Santosh Red hat is a piece of clothing which makes a fashion statement. It is very impractical during the hot summer day

Re: RedHat

On Wed, 22 May 2002, Santosh Varma wrote: > I wanted to know what is this RedHat, its significance and its features. Any > links/doc's on that ??? > Thanks and regards, Santosh: This is a bit off-topic, so we should probably keep it short. RedHat is a commercial company which created a "distri

RE: RedHat

Santosh, A low cost "Hat" designed and worn by a few famous university dudes. Actually very popular these days due to its affordability. I think there may be a few variants of this Hat as well. Redhat - like the colour Red, goes with most outfits.

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

- Original Message - > Just an FYI, I was missing a link in the rc2.d directory for K00... script. In other flavors of unix, runlevel 2 was startup multiuser, didn't think it needed a kill link. Thanks to all for your help! > I don't think u need to kill oracle (K?? link) when u enter

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

Just an FYI, I was missing a link in the rc2.d directory for K00... script. In other flavors of unix, runlevel 2 was startup multiuser, didn't think it needed a kill link. Thanks to all for your help! Gene >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/14/02 08:28AM >>> [Gene Sais] > Thank you. Not sure if it wi

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

[Gene Sais] > Thank you. Not sure if it will work, but I was missing an K00... entry in rc2.d. I >just linked it, lets see what happens on next bounce. FWIW, the "right" way to deal with these symlinks under RHL 7.2 is to have an /etc/init.d/whatever "wrapper" script that includes a comment se

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

Thank you. Not sure if it will work, but I was missing an K00... entry in rc2.d. I just linked it, lets see what happens on next bounce. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/02 03:32PM >>> Gene Sais wrote: > > its set to Y. i think its a linux issue, just wondering anyone else using linux and >when

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

Gene Sais wrote: > > its set to Y. i think its a linux issue, just wondering anyone else using linux and >when rebooting the server it shutdowns the db's? it calls the scripts to startup >just not the shutdown. > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/02 02:01PM >>> > Please also ensure you have entr

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

- Original Message - > forgot to mention: > > i tested from root user and it worked. also it works from oracle. i think the shutdown is not calling the rc0.d scripts? i've seen this before on solaris i think, i.e. some commands put it in the rc6.d directory, runlevel 0 (rc0.d) is 'ha

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

thanks. i have the scripts linked to rc6.d also. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/02 01:21PM >>> - Original Message - > > I placed the db startup and shutdown scripts in /etc/rc.d/init.d directories and linked them to rc0.d, rc2.d, rc3.d, rc4.d, rc5.d. The databases startup fine, however t

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

its set to Y. i think its a linux issue, just wondering anyone else using linux and when rebooting the server it shutdowns the db's? it calls the scripts to startup just not the shutdown. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/02 02:01PM >>> Please also ensure you have entry of your databases in /etc/or

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

forgot to mention: i tested from root user and it worked. also it works from oracle. i think the shutdown is not calling the rc0.d scripts? i've seen this before on solaris i think, i.e. some commands call the rc scripts where some do not, e.g. halt or init 0 does not call the shutdown scri

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

Please also ensure you have entry of your databases in /etc/oratab file whith last field as 'Y'. You oratab file may be on differnt location than /etc. Check for $ORACLE_HOME/bin/dbstart file for exact location of oratab file Regards Rafiq Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

Did you test the scripts from the command line?? /etc/init.d/dbora stop /etc/init.d/dbora start ? -Joe --- Gene Sais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OS: redhat linux 7.2 > DB: oracle 9.0.1 > Issue: Databases startup but do not shutdown > > I placed the db startup and shutdown scripts in /etc/rc

Re: RedHat Linux 7.2 & Oracle 9i Shutdown

- Original Message - > > I placed the db startup and shutdown scripts in /etc/rc.d/init.d directories and linked them to rc0.d, rc2.d, rc3.d, rc4.d, rc5.d. The databases startup fine, however they do NOT shutdown when I issue "shutdown -r now" command from root. Any clues, hints? Mayb

RE: RedHat and Oracle

Title: RedHat and Oracle Funny how this is going since Oracle invested in Red Hat a few years ago.   Remember ->http://news.cnet.com/news/0,1,0-1003-200-339689,00.html -Original Message-From: Marianne Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 10:21 AMTo: