Consider the source.
Igor Neyman, OCP DBA[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
KENNETH JANUSZ
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:03
AM
Subject: SQL Server vs. Oracle 9i
This is interesting:
I bet following variable is set in the test
_ignore_downtime_cost=true;
_ignore_reboots_cost=true;
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't
yeah but it was written by MS.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/03/02 10:03AM
This is interesting:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/020403/sfw026_1.html
Ken Janusz, CPIM
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Gene Sais
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services
The
Walklett Group, the author of the paper cited,
is a
consulting/services company and has Microsoft
listed
on their "Alliances" web page, although the
exact
nature of the relationship is not defined.
The
paper makes a number of assumptions that I
would
question.
After
reading it, I
:23 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
RE: SQL Server vs. Oracle 9i
The
Walklett Group, the author of the paper cited,
is a
consulting/services company and has Microsoft
listed on their "Alliances" web page, although the
exact nature of the re
cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: SQL Server vs. Oracle 9i
[EMAIL PROTECTED
It's fascinating when somebody proclaims "50%
savings in TCO over a 5 year period" when it is patently obvious that
A)such aconfiguration has not existed over the past five years and
B) it will never exist over any contiguous five year period. The lifecycle
of systems doesn't happen that
Hi Tim,
Nice to see you here
-bill
At 01:03 PM 4/3/2002 -0800, you wrote:
It's
fascinating when somebody proclaims 50% savings in TCO over a 5
year period when it is patently obvious that A) such a
configuration has not existed over the past five years and B) it will
never exist over any
Just think of what the savings would be over a 50 year period!
WOW!
Ken
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Gorman
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:03
PM
Subject: Re: SQL Server vs. Oracle
9i
It's fascinating when
