: Outsourcing's dirty secret
Hi All
DBA's all here hmm...well if i were the CFO i would
have been lookin for the fast=true parameter if i were
bald i would have been looking for a pill or a cream
that would give me hairs overnight..the time of
instant nirvana has come :-)..software bpo call
centeres
dagni, Rajendra" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/30/2003 09:49 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple
recipients of list ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
Subject:
RE: Outsourcing's dirty secret
What is also unfortunate that
Title: Message
may
best brains survive where ever it is.
-Original Message-From: Anjan Thakuria
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:34
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
Outsourcing's dirty secret
Thank you Jared
to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Outsourcing's dirty
secret
What is also unfortunate that the company X which
outsourced its project
to India, didn't do its job right ... If you just
want
: Outsourcing's dirty
secret
What is also unfortunate that the company X which
outsourced its project
to India, didn't do its job right ... If you just
want the cheapest Rolex,
you can't complain about its quality later on. I
am not saying this
couldn't have happened, whatever happened
:RE: Outsourcing's dirty
secret
What is also unfortunate that the company X
which
outsourced its project
to India, didn't do its job right ... If you
just
want the cheapest Rolex,
you can't complain about its quality later on. I
am not saying this
couldn't have
, Rajendra
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/30/2003 09:49 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Outsourcing's dirty
secret
What
To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Outsourcing's dirty
secret
What is also unfortunate that the company X which
outsourced its project
to India, didn't do its job right ... If you just
want the cheapest Rolex
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Outsourcing's dirty secret
What is also unfortunate that the company X which outsourced its
project
to India, didn't do its job right ... If you just want the cheapest
Rolex
List - If a manager seems to be contemplating outsourcing, you might want to
post this. Unless you work for an outsourcer. ;-)
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/Hidden_Costs_of_IT_Outso
urcing.html
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Please see the
What is also unfortunate that the company X which outsourced its project to India,
didn't do its job right ... If you just want the cheapest Rolex, you can't complain
about its quality later on. I am not saying this couldn't have happened, whatever
happened is unfortunate, but I am just saying
PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/30/2003 09:49 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To:Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Outsourcing's dirty secret
What is also unfortunate that the company X which outsourced its project to India
Same is true for getting the 'cheapest' price for a project that just
requires a contractor to work in house. SOMETIMES you get what you pay
for, and (from what I understand) occasionally what you
deserve.
April Wells Oracle DBA/Oracle Apps DBA Corporate Systems Amarillo Texas /\ / \ / \ \
:
Subject:RE: Outsourcing's dirty secret
What is also unfortunate that the company X which outsourced its project
to India, didn't do its job right ... If you just want the cheapest Rolex,
you can't complain about its quality later on. I am not saying this
couldn't have
Title: RE: Outsourcing's dirty secret
not only salries, but job opportunities as well:-)
greg
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Gogala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:39 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Outsourcing's dirty secret
recipients of list ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Outsourcing's dirty secret
What is also unfortunate that the company X which outsourced its project
to India, didn't do its job right ... If you just want the cheapest Rolex,
you can't complain
by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/30/2003 09:49 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Outsourcing's dirty secret
What is also unfortunate that the company X which outsourced its project
to India
I've found the note. It wasn't what I remembered,
it was worse. I've just re-run a test on 9.0.1.2
that shows an interesting issue:
create table t1 (n1 number, v1 varchar2(10));
create index i1 on t1(n1) pctfree 0 initrans 10;
insert into t1
select rownum,'x'
from all_objects
where rownum =
a difference.
RE None of them made a difference.
RE So I dumped blocks that had been populated only during this exercise.
RE Invariably, there were 0x29 Itl slots. Is there something out there
RE that would limit the Itl entries to 41 even when MAXTRANS=255? Is
RE there some secret bound based on block
which one(s) made a difference.
None of them made a difference.
So I dumped blocks that had been populated only during this exercise.
Invariably, there were 0x29 Itl slots. Is there something out there
that would limit the Itl entries to 41 even when MAXTRANS=255? Is
there some secret bound based
one(s) made a difference.
None of them made a difference.
So I dumped blocks that had been populated only during this exercise.
Invariably, there were 0x29 Itl slots. Is there something out there
that would limit the Itl entries to 41 even when MAXTRANS=255? Is
there some secret bound based
Hi!
Man , I should say that I am 'surprised'..
cos we were on WAS 3.0.2
and had 'severe problems' (the webserver used to hang
during business hours)
and Oracle suggested we upgrade to IAS
how come u are able to 'run' WAS without
Oracle 'support'
can u please let me into the secret
22 matches
Mail list logo
