Re: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Stephane Faroult

I am afraid we have seen too many 'flavour-of-the-month' fads already. I
fear that Larry is about as clueless as I am about the immediate future
of IT and Oracle's 'strategy' has more or less been a succession of more
or less well inspired tactical moves. I have known Oracle when
distribution of everything was all the rage. Concerning Jonathan's
reference to the email servers, I remember having read some years ago in
a plane in a non-IT paper (FT or Wall Street Journal, can't remember) a
longish interview of Larry where he was bragging about his being an
engineer, his conviction that it was doable and how he had imposed his
will (big effort, when you know how slavish some may be at Oracle :-)),
especially against Oracle Singapore, and, if I remember well, Oracle
Canada. A few months later, electricians working in Redwood Shores to
make electricity supplies redundant or something similar goofed (not the
exclusivity of DBAs) and as a result THE WHOLE OF ORACLE, WORLDWIDE, HAD
NO E-MAIL FOR TWO DAYS. Note that when it's deep night in California
some people at Oracle do not seem to understand that in Asia everybody
is working, and in Europe too. It must have been an enormous roar of
laughter in Singapore and in Canada. The problem with centralised
systems is that there is another company, which I do not understand why
it is feared so much by Oracle if their systems really are as slow as
the Oracle ads pretend, which has been doing it already for about 40
years, and it doing it rather well.
Concerning the hardware, same story. Historically Oracle was first
developed on PDPs, then moved to VAXes. In the mid 1980s development was
supposed to be done on Sun boxes, however, strangely, the VMS port still
was the first to be available. There has been a time when we heard a lot
about N-Cube (remember?), of which Larry was a big shareholder, then
about Sequent (ditto). Then it looked like honeymoon with Sun, till the
climate deteriorated amongst accusations of unfairness (for what I have
heard, Oracle was a bigger customer of Sun than the reverse). Oracle
fell for HP. Given the current row about the Compaq takeover, I am not
surprised that it has cooled. Larry must wait for Ms Fiorina's head to
roll in the sand. It's terrible how much what is usually presented as
'vision', 'strategy' etc. is often hardly more than personal inimities
(Bill Gates being to many CEOs what the Taleban were to Afghan warlords)
and opportunistic alliances.

My 0.02 euros.

S Faroult

Deshpande, Kirti wrote:
 
 Ah!! But 5 years down the road, Larry's Oracle database may not need any
 administration at all. You may just buy the pre-fabricated OraLintel
 gadget from him that runs your apps...  :-))
 Seriously, he me getting in position to fight the IBM Linux Mainframe
 running DB2(IBM announced the Linux MF not too long ago) and claim/prove(?)
 Oracle+Linux+Intel runs much faster than IBM's Linux mainframe..
 
 - Kirti
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:35 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Stephane Faroult
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra

We had a small discussion yesterday about Oracle moving to Linux (possibly),
so my SA asks ... Is there any OS vendor left in the market that Uncle L
hasn't pissed off yet? Sun was dumped in favor of HP, they already pissed
off IBM because of DB/2, not dumping HP they move to Linux. So I told him
that wait, they haven't done anything yet to MacOS, (after revival) CP/M
(and a bunch of other Operating Systems).

Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.

QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!



*2

This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above 
and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank you.

*2




Re: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Rachel Carmichael

it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them


--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Jonathan Gennick
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
 Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! 
http://auctions.yahoo.com
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Rachel Carmichael
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re[2]: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread dgoulet

Jonathan,

I remember reading an article in Oracle Magazine about a year to year  a
half ago, where Uncle Larry was prostelatizing us to create one large database
vs. having lots of small ones.  So the screw turns once more!!  Also I remember
Oracle being torqued at RedHat some time ago  find that 9i is NOT certified on
RedHat.  Guess that will change!  Also, for those who remember, Uncle Larry did
predict that the database would replace the operating system some years ago. 
Funny how these ideas change, don't materialize, or have other problems that
prevent them becoming reality.  But then I guess that's what you get trying to
read a foggy crystal ball!! :-)

My problem with all of this is that he's pointing us towards cheaper
computers and operating systems, but will the cost of Oracle itself follow??  I
doubt it.  Which puts a pile of us in a rather sticky position.  How do you
justify $40K for Oracle on a $10K computer with a $0 OS?

My brain hurts.

Dick Goulet

BTW: Uncle Larry torqued off Apple (MacOS) some years ago when he dropped
support for it all together.

Reply Separator
Author: Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   1/31/2002 6:35 PM

Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
derides client-server and distributed computing saying
that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
much easier to administer one big one.

Best regards,

Jonathan Gennick   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com

Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux

AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
AMG0 servers
AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
AMG0 Corp.
AMG0 servers running Linux.

AMG0 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jonathan Gennick
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Stephane Faroult

In a previous life in the 1980s, an IBM salesman has told me a funny
story about an IBM marketing guy who was a specialist of strategy
speeches, future of IT, etc. The salesman took a customer to a
presentation once, and was very impressed by the speech in which the
marketing man was demonstrating, extremely logically, that the future of
IT was centralized big servers. As he had been so impressed, he took
another customer to the same presentation a few months later, and, as he
had already heard it, listened a bit less attentively. He began to
startle around the conclusion, which no less logically than the first
time was proving beyond any doubt that the future of IT was made of
distributed processing power (IBM had announced the PC in the meantime).
The salesman told me he had never understood where the logic had
derailed.
I have heard the marketing guy myself, he was VERY good.

Rachel Carmichael wrote:
 
 it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
 as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
 there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
 systems.
 
 I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
 systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
 then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
 don't get the things we need fast enough from them
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Stephane Faroult
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Re[2]: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Boivin, Patrice J

The irony is that Microsoft plans to put a built-in rdbms in the OS that
will come out two versions after .NET Server.

The rdbms will be in the OS, not the other way around.

Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)


 -Original Message-
Sent:   Friday, February 01, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Re[2]: Linux taking over at Oracle

Jonathan,

I remember reading an article in Oracle Magazine about a year to year 
a
half ago, where Uncle Larry was prostelatizing us to create one large
database
vs. having lots of small ones.  So the screw turns once more!!  Also I
remember
Oracle being torqued at RedHat some time ago  find that 9i is NOT certified
on
RedHat.  Guess that will change!  Also, for those who remember, Uncle Larry
did
predict that the database would replace the operating system some years
ago. 
Funny how these ideas change, don't materialize, or have other problems that
prevent them becoming reality.  But then I guess that's what you get trying
to
read a foggy crystal ball!! :-)

My problem with all of this is that he's pointing us towards cheaper
computers and operating systems, but will the cost of Oracle itself follow??
I
doubt it.  Which puts a pile of us in a rather sticky position.  How do you
justify $40K for Oracle on a $10K computer with a $0 OS?

My brain hurts.

Dick Goulet

BTW: Uncle Larry torqued off Apple (MacOS) some years ago when he dropped
support for it all together.

Reply Separator
Author: Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   1/31/2002 6:35 PM

Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
derides client-server and distributed computing saying
that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
much easier to administer one big one.

Best regards,

Jonathan Gennick   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com

Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux

AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
AMG0 servers
AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
AMG0 Corp.
AMG0 servers running Linux.

AMG0 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jonathan Gennick
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Re[2]: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Robertson Lee - lerobe

Uurrgghh !!!

prostelatizing - could you not have said preaching.  Alphabetti Spaghetti
for lunch ???

:-)

-Original Message-
Sent: 01 February 2002 13:45
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Jonathan,

I remember reading an article in Oracle Magazine about a year to year 
a
half ago, where Uncle Larry was prostelatizing us to create one large
database
vs. having lots of small ones.  So the screw turns once more!!  Also I
remember
Oracle being torqued at RedHat some time ago  find that 9i is NOT certified
on
RedHat.  Guess that will change!  Also, for those who remember, Uncle Larry
did
predict that the database would replace the operating system some years
ago. 
Funny how these ideas change, don't materialize, or have other problems that
prevent them becoming reality.  But then I guess that's what you get trying
to
read a foggy crystal ball!! :-)

My problem with all of this is that he's pointing us towards cheaper
computers and operating systems, but will the cost of Oracle itself follow??
I
doubt it.  Which puts a pile of us in a rather sticky position.  How do you
justify $40K for Oracle on a $10K computer with a $0 OS?

My brain hurts.

Dick Goulet

BTW: Uncle Larry torqued off Apple (MacOS) some years ago when he dropped
support for it all together.

Reply Separator
Author: Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   1/31/2002 6:35 PM

Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
derides client-server and distributed computing saying
that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
much easier to administer one big one.

Best regards,

Jonathan Gennick   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com

Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux

AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
AMG0 servers
AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
AMG0 Corp.
AMG0 servers running Linux.

AMG0 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jonathan Gennick
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this communication in error, please 
re-send this communication to the sender and delete the 
original message or any copy of it from your computer
system.
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Robertson Lee - lerobe
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Re[2]: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Michael Kline

The consolidate, don't consolidate goes to those areas where companies
may have broke up a large site into smaller hubs. These helped the 
processing because a hub would normally be closer than central and 
dedicated lines were VERY expensive and they still did a ton of printing.

So, we break down a $1 million site with $1 million of support staff and
declare victory when we build 10 $100,000 sites with 10 $100,000 support
staff. The arguments come that this will go down in time... It doesn't..
DBA's get very hard to find, and it's hard to keep one at a $100,000 site.
You end up just training them.

In the meantime you find that the internet is getting faster and faster,
VPNs start to come of age, dedicated frame relay lines get to be much
more reasonable.

This gave the companies several approaches.. They could break up even
more or could consolidate and still handle the traffic. So the $1 million
site comes back, they now only need 1 senior DBA willing to work 80 hours
a week. They don't have 10 rents, 10 staffs, 10 still kind of expensive
computers, they only need one. There is enough work to keep those hard
to find DBAs interested and pay them as little/much as they will accept
and still stay. Stability comes back... to an extent.

Now, coming, may well be small Linux servers with 60-180 gig of storage
and perhaps $4-10k per box. They will be remote, so corporate will still
handle the data. If they go down, they simply rebuild one, and could be
up and running in 24-48 hours, and it's only one remote site... They 
may well need a good, almost seamless remote administration, and NO
SUPPORT staff on site. KISS... If Oracle comes down to perhaps $1-5k for 
the database based perhaps on Linux and cpu, they could get a Whole 
bunch of Oracle out there.

Send updates to corporate, distribute if necessary in near real time,
and use the remotes to keep network traffic to near nil.

All this depending on size and application and things could change 
accordingly.

It just keeps getting more and more interesting.


ThinkSpark  - Michael Alan Kline, Sr. 
Technical Consultant -  Richmond, Virginia Office
13308 Thornridge Court; Midlothian, VA 23112, USA.
W:804-744-1545  Cell: 804-314-6262
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Alpha pager: www.metrocall.com/Page.html
ICQ: 1009605, 975313PhoneFree: 1057439 



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:45 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Re[2]: Linux taking over at Oracle
 
 
 Jonathan,
 
 I remember reading an article in Oracle Magazine about a year to year  a
 half ago, where Uncle Larry was prostelatizing us to create one large database
 vs. having lots of small ones.  So the screw turns once more!!  Also I remember
 Oracle being torqued at RedHat some time ago  find that 9i is NOT certified on
 RedHat.  Guess that will change!  Also, for those who remember, Uncle Larry did
 predict that the database would replace the operating system some years ago. 
 Funny how these ideas change, don't materialize, or have other problems that
 prevent them becoming reality.  But then I guess that's what you get trying to
 read a foggy crystal ball!! :-)
 
 My problem with all of this is that he's pointing us towards cheaper
 computers and operating systems, but will the cost of Oracle itself follow??  I
 doubt it.  Which puts a pile of us in a rather sticky position.  How do you
 justify $40K for Oracle on a $10K computer with a $0 OS?
 
 My brain hurts.
 
 Dick Goulet
 
 BTW: Uncle Larry torqued off Apple (MacOS) some years ago when he dropped
 support for it all together.
 
 Reply Separator
 Author: Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:   1/31/2002 6:35 PM
 
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author

RE: Re[2]: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Weaver, Walt

I think Larry lives in his own dream world. We're currently using Oracle on
inexpensive Linux servers, but that probably won't last for long.

Our Oracle licenses cost over $65,000 per server. The servers cost about
$30,000 each, and the OS is essentially free. Makes no sense at all. If
Oracle continues to insist on using its ridiculous pricing schemes we'll
probably become an all-MySQL shop, at least after InnoDB matures a bit.

I've worked with Oracle for fifteen years now, and Larry's even more flaky
now than he was back then.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:45 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Jonathan,

I remember reading an article in Oracle Magazine about a year to year 
a
half ago, where Uncle Larry was prostelatizing us to create one large
database
vs. having lots of small ones.  So the screw turns once more!!  Also I
remember
Oracle being torqued at RedHat some time ago  find that 9i is NOT certified
on
RedHat.  Guess that will change!  Also, for those who remember, Uncle Larry
did
predict that the database would replace the operating system some years
ago. 
Funny how these ideas change, don't materialize, or have other problems that
prevent them becoming reality.  But then I guess that's what you get trying
to
read a foggy crystal ball!! :-)

My problem with all of this is that he's pointing us towards cheaper
computers and operating systems, but will the cost of Oracle itself follow??
I
doubt it.  Which puts a pile of us in a rather sticky position.  How do you
justify $40K for Oracle on a $10K computer with a $0 OS?

My brain hurts.

Dick Goulet

BTW: Uncle Larry torqued off Apple (MacOS) some years ago when he dropped
support for it all together.

Reply Separator
Author: Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   1/31/2002 6:35 PM

Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
derides client-server and distributed computing saying
that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
much easier to administer one big one.

Best regards,

Jonathan Gennick   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com

Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux

AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
AMG0 servers
AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
AMG0 Corp.
AMG0 servers running Linux.

AMG0 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jonathan Gennick
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread orantdba

Hi All,

I don't think anything here indicates that we are going back to hundreds 
of smaller databases.  I does indicate that he is pushing the Real 
Application Clusters on thes smaller boxes so that they can continue to 
support large databases.

John

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jonathan,

I remember reading an article in Oracle Magazine about a year to year  a
half ago, where Uncle Larry was prostelatizing us to create one large database
vs. having lots of small ones.  So the screw turns once more!!  Also I remember
Oracle being torqued at RedHat some time ago  find that 9i is NOT certified on
RedHat.  Guess that will change!  Also, for those who remember, Uncle Larry did
predict that the database would replace the operating system some years ago. 
Funny how these ideas change, don't materialize, or have other problems that
prevent them becoming reality.  But then I guess that's what you get trying to
read a foggy crystal ball!! :-)

My problem with all of this is that he's pointing us towards cheaper
computers and operating systems, but will the cost of Oracle itself follow??  I
doubt it.  Which puts a pile of us in a rather sticky position.  How do you
justify $40K for Oracle on a $10K computer with a $0 OS?

My brain hurts.

Dick Goulet

BTW: Uncle Larry torqued off Apple (MacOS) some years ago when he dropped
support for it all together.

Reply Separator
Author: Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   1/31/2002 6:35 PM

Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
derides client-server and distributed computing saying
that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
much easier to administer one big one.

Best regards,

Jonathan Gennick   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com

Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux

AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
AMG0 servers
AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
AMG0 Corp.
AMG0 servers running Linux.

AMG0 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: orantdba
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Re[2]: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra

I think eventually MS will come out a kitchen sink (called .MSKitchenSink)
in .NET software, but every time you run the garbage disposal, everyone in
the world will know about it. Some people shouldn't be allowed to innovate
... by law.

Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.

QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!


***1

This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above 
and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify ESPN at (860) 766-2000 and 
delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank you.

***1



RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Orr, Steve

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re:RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread dgoulet

Steve,

As one of the GREAT MicroSlop bashers, I pray you are more than correct. 
May the Penguin rule!!

BTW: I've experimented with Oracle 8  8i on Linux, RedHat's variant,  I'll
agree it is stable, easy to use, and very supportable.  The problem is the cost
of Oracle on a Linux box.  One reason I've been playing around with PostGres.  I
can't say I like it as much, but you really can't beat the price tag.

DickG.

Reply Separator
Author: Orr; Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   2/1/2002 7:55 AM

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Jesse, Rich

I think that the LVM announcement in the link below is the lynchpin for
getting Linux Enterprise-wide (man, I hate buzzwords!):

http://www.veritas.com/news/press/PressReleaseDetail.jhtml?NewsId=9483

Now if I could only get Oracle on Linux for Alpha, I'd be set!

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread John Kanagaraj

 I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all 
 software and
 systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
 then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
 don't get the things we need fast enough from them

I always think that thinking in IT is like a huge pendulum in one of those
granfather clocks - swing one way this year, swing the other way the next,
and back again we go! Whatever direction it swings, there has to be some
springs and gears and wheels that makes it all work. DBAs are  a small but
important part of that clock - we only have to watch out for that
piezo-electric crytal and LED/LCDs that *may* make us moving parts
redundant.

Just another lesson in Life from yours truly!

John Kanagaraj
Oracle Applications DBA
DBSoft Inc
(W): 408-970-7002

Fear is the darkroom where Evil develops your negatives. 
Wanna break free of fear? Click on 'http://www.needhim.org'

** The opinions and statements above are entirely my own and not those of my
employer or clients **
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: John Kanagaraj
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Grabowy, Chris

I thought it also put a dent in HP/UX  Solaris sales...easier to migrate
UNIX to Linux.  I believe Amazon is a good example.  For the record, I have
no love for MS.

Congrats on your ReplayTV, it will blow your mind once you fully grasp it's
usefulness.  I love my TiVo, and I can't live without it.  Looking forward
to the Superbowl, and doing my own replays, slow motion plays back and
forth, etc.

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Grabowy, Chris
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Re[2]: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread George Hofilena

become an all-MySQL shop

As we are here now.  Aaagh!  We are planning to buy PeopleSoft and my boss
has practically decided on his own that we should buy SQL Server.  And if
not for the fact that our other applications here couldn't run on SQL Server
Oracle would have been history here.  I hate that psycho up there they call
CEO in Oracle.

George

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:30 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I think Larry lives in his own dream world. We're currently using Oracle on
inexpensive Linux servers, but that probably won't last for long.

Our Oracle licenses cost over $65,000 per server. The servers cost about
$30,000 each, and the OS is essentially free. Makes no sense at all. If
Oracle continues to insist on using its ridiculous pricing schemes we'll
probably become an all-MySQL shop, at least after InnoDB matures a bit.

I've worked with Oracle for fifteen years now, and Larry's even more flaky
now than he was back then.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:45 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Jonathan,

I remember reading an article in Oracle Magazine about a year to year 
a
half ago, where Uncle Larry was prostelatizing us to create one large
database
vs. having lots of small ones.  So the screw turns once more!!  Also I
remember
Oracle being torqued at RedHat some time ago  find that 9i is NOT certified
on
RedHat.  Guess that will change!  Also, for those who remember, Uncle Larry
did
predict that the database would replace the operating system some years
ago. 
Funny how these ideas change, don't materialize, or have other problems that
prevent them becoming reality.  But then I guess that's what you get trying
to
read a foggy crystal ball!! :-)

My problem with all of this is that he's pointing us towards cheaper
computers and operating systems, but will the cost of Oracle itself follow??
I
doubt it.  Which puts a pile of us in a rather sticky position.  How do you
justify $40K for Oracle on a $10K computer with a $0 OS?

My brain hurts.

Dick Goulet

BTW: Uncle Larry torqued off Apple (MacOS) some years ago when he dropped
support for it all together.

Reply Separator
Author: Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   1/31/2002 6:35 PM

Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
derides client-server and distributed computing saying
that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
much easier to administer one big one.

Best regards,

Jonathan Gennick   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com

Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux

AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
AMG0 servers
AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
AMG0 Corp.
AMG0 servers running Linux.

AMG0 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jonathan Gennick
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

RE: RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Gogala, Mladen

There are rumors that Red Hat is buying Microsoft?

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve,

As one of the GREAT MicroSlop bashers, I pray you are more than correct.

May the Penguin rule!!

BTW: I've experimented with Oracle 8  8i on Linux, RedHat's variant, 
I'll
agree it is stable, easy to use, and very supportable.  The problem is the
cost
of Oracle on a Linux box.  One reason I've been playing around with
PostGres.  I
can't say I like it as much, but you really can't beat the price tag.

DickG.

Reply Separator
Author: Orr; Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   2/1/2002 7:55 AM

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Gogala, Mladen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access 

RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Orr, Steve

For a different perspective step into Larry's shoes for a minute, (O...
that's scary!)... Hmmm... the less they have to spend on servers the more
money left over to spend on me, er, my products... 

Oracle will get away with their pricing as long as the competition isn't so
stiff that they have to lower their prices to protect their base... but a
day of reckoning is coming. 

Not selling my Oracle stock... yet.



-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Orr, Steve; Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve,

As one of the GREAT MicroSlop bashers, I pray you are more than correct.

May the Penguin rule!!

BTW: I've experimented with Oracle 8  8i on Linux, RedHat's variant, 
I'll
agree it is stable, easy to use, and very supportable.  The problem is the
cost
of Oracle on a Linux box.  One reason I've been playing around with
PostGres.  I
can't say I like it as much, but you really can't beat the price tag.

DickG.

Reply Separator
Author: Orr; Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   2/1/2002 7:55 AM

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: 

RE: RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Grabowy, Chris

It's not a rumor, it's true...MS is letting themselves become aquired by Red
Hat, they figure that all the lawsuits will have to be dropped, and there
going to put the Windows GUI onto RH Linux.  A killer combo.  

A brillant move by Bill Gates.

https://www.usatoday.com/current/0201/am/rhmspur.html

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


There are rumors that Red Hat is buying Microsoft?

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve,

As one of the GREAT MicroSlop bashers, I pray you are more than correct.

May the Penguin rule!!

BTW: I've experimented with Oracle 8  8i on Linux, RedHat's variant, 
I'll
agree it is stable, easy to use, and very supportable.  The problem is the
cost
of Oracle on a Linux box.  One reason I've been playing around with
PostGres.  I
can't say I like it as much, but you really can't beat the price tag.

DickG.

Reply Separator
Author: Orr; Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   2/1/2002 7:55 AM

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, 

RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F

Not selling my Oracle stock... yet.

now is the time to buy!  it's cheap!

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:42 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


For a different perspective step into Larry's shoes for a minute, (O...
that's scary!)... Hmmm... the less they have to spend on servers the more
money left over to spend on me, er, my products... 

Oracle will get away with their pricing as long as the competition isn't so
stiff that they have to lower their prices to protect their base... but a
day of reckoning is coming. 

Not selling my Oracle stock... yet.



-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Orr, Steve; Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve,

As one of the GREAT MicroSlop bashers, I pray you are more than correct.

May the Penguin rule!!

BTW: I've experimented with Oracle 8  8i on Linux, RedHat's variant, 
I'll
agree it is stable, easy to use, and very supportable.  The problem is the
cost
of Oracle on a Linux box.  One reason I've been playing around with
PostGres.  I
can't say I like it as much, but you really can't beat the price tag.

DickG.

Reply Separator
Author: Orr; Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   2/1/2002 7:55 AM

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread George Hofilena

now is the time to buy!  it's cheap!

True.  But it's not going to get any higher either (my own prediction) :)

George

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Not selling my Oracle stock... yet.

now is the time to buy!  it's cheap!

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:42 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


For a different perspective step into Larry's shoes for a minute, (O...
that's scary!)... Hmmm... the less they have to spend on servers the more
money left over to spend on me, er, my products... 

Oracle will get away with their pricing as long as the competition isn't so
stiff that they have to lower their prices to protect their base... but a
day of reckoning is coming. 

Not selling my Oracle stock... yet.



-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Orr, Steve; Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Steve,

As one of the GREAT MicroSlop bashers, I pray you are more than correct.

May the Penguin rule!!

BTW: I've experimented with Oracle 8  8i on Linux, RedHat's variant, 
I'll
agree it is stable, easy to use, and very supportable.  The problem is the
cost
of Oracle on a Linux box.  One reason I've been playing around with
PostGres.  I
can't say I like it as much, but you really can't beat the price tag.

DickG.

Reply Separator
Author: Orr; Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   2/1/2002 7:55 AM

On a contrarian note with all the Larry hype aside... Linux is much more
that just a fad. In a relatively short time it has already put a very
significant dent in MS server software sales and I'm sure it's going to 
affect Sun/HP regardless of Oracle's IT infrastructure strategies. 
Linux/Intel is a proven production quality platform and having worked
with Linux/Oracle servers for over a year now I conclude that the Linux
revolution is not going away like just another fad. In fact, it's just
getting started. BTW, I'm getting ready to buy a ReplayTV unit and guess
what it runs on?  ... LINUX!!!

If you want to get a good idea of what folks are doing with Oracle on 
Linux just join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list or go to
http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/index.html ... etc.

I think the point behind all this is that, large, complex servers can be
a support challenge with capacity planning for always on, 24x7, 
unlimited future scalability needs.

Rather than racking our brains we should be RAC'ing our servers.


Steve Orr,
Montana Revolutionary


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:40 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


it's not just Oracle, this tends to be a trend in all businesses. Just
as there are fads in clothing (shorter hemlines, longer hemlines etc),
there seem to be fads in the right way to manage your computer
systems.

I've seen the cycle turn a number of times centralize all software and
systems, one data center to serve them all, standards cross-company
then suddenly it's decentralize, one big center makes no sense, we
don't get the things we need fast enough from them

--- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
 Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
 derides client-server and distributed computing saying
 that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
 times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
 consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
 five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
 silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
 much easier to administer one big one.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Jonathan Gennick   
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
 http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com *
 http://ValleySpur.com
 
 Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
 AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux
 
 AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three
 Unix
 AMG0 servers
 AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster
 of Intel
 AMG0 Corp.
 AMG0 servers running Linux.
 
 AMG0

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official 

RE: RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Jesse, Rich

Erm, what drugs are you taking and do you have any left over for me?

usatoday.com doesn't use SSL and that link without SSL isn't on their
site...

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


It's not a rumor, it's true...MS is letting themselves become aquired by Red
Hat, they figure that all the lawsuits will have to be dropped, and there
going to put the Windows GUI onto RH Linux.  A killer combo.  

A brillant move by Bill Gates.

https://www.usatoday.com/current/0201/am/rhmspur.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-02-01 Thread Jon Baker
Title: RE: RE: Linux taking over at Oracle





I think you can figure just from the text that this was a hoax. red hat acquiring microsoft? now that would take some serious capitalization.


Jon Baker


-Original Message-
From: Jesse, Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:01 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: RE: Linux taking over at Oracle



Erm, what drugs are you taking and do you have any left over for me?


usatoday.com doesn't use SSL and that link without SSL isn't on their
site...


Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA



-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



It's not a rumor, it's true...MS is letting themselves become aquired by Red
Hat, they figure that all the lawsuits will have to be dropped, and there
going to put the Windows GUI onto RH Linux. A killer combo. 


A brillant move by Bill Gates.


https://www.usatoday.com/current/0201/am/rhmspur.html
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).





Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-01-31 Thread Adams, Matthew (GEA, 088130)
Title: Linux taking over at Oracle





For anyone who missed it:
-



Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux


The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix servers
that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel Corp.
servers running Linux.


http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html



Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Discussing a black rectangle silhouetted on a martian landscape
That is the top of the calibration target,
that is NOT in fact a monolith
 - NASA TV Commentator - 7/5/1997





Re: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-01-31 Thread Ron Rogers

Interesting information especially about the HP boxes not being
replaced. Could it be that the HP/Compaq merger go ahead is not the move
that Larry desired? After all the RAC is an Oracle and Compaq wedding.
Looks like the honeymoon is over and the new young kid won for a while.
 Maybe now it will be easier to get the oracle/linux software releases
I have been asking for.
ROR mª¿ªm

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/02 02:36PM 
For anyone who missed it:
-


Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux

The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
servers
that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
Corp.
servers running Linux.

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html



Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: from CONNECT-MTA by 
galotterom 
Discussing a black rectangle silhouetted on a martian landscape
That is the top of the calibration target,
that is NOT in fact a monolith
  - NASA TV Commentator - 7/5/1997
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Ron Rogers
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-01-31 Thread Jonathan Gennick

Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
derides client-server and distributed computing saying
that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
much easier to administer one big one.

Best regards,

Jonathan Gennick   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com

Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux

AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
AMG0 servers
AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
AMG0 Corp.
AMG0 servers running Linux.

AMG0 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jonathan Gennick
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Linux taking over at Oracle

2002-01-31 Thread Deshpande, Kirti

Ah!! But 5 years down the road, Larry's Oracle database may not need any
administration at all. You may just buy the pre-fabricated OraLintel
gadget from him that runs your apps...  :-)) 
Seriously, he me getting in position to fight the IBM Linux Mainframe
running DB2(IBM announced the Linux MF not too long ago) and claim/prove(?)
Oracle+Linux+Intel runs much faster than IBM's Linux mainframe..  

- Kirti 

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Interesting news. Makes me wonder though. Remember when
Oracle moved to support client-server computing? Now Larry
derides client-server and distributed computing saying
that it's cheaper to have just one big system. How many
times have you heard Larry talk about how Oracle's
consolidated their email servers? Makes me wonder whether
five years down the road Larry will be telling us that it's
silly to run a database on 50 cheap boxes because it's
much easier to administer one big one.

Best regards,

Jonathan Gennick   
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * 906.387.1698
http://Gennick.com * http://MichiganWaterfalls.com * http://ValleySpur.com

Thursday, January 31, 2002, 2:36:21 PM, you wrote:
AMG0 Ellison says Oracle's 'whole business' to run on Linux

AMG0 The Oracle chairman and CEO said the company will replace three Unix
AMG0 servers
AMG0 that run the bulk of its business applications with a cluster of Intel
AMG0 Corp.
AMG0 servers running Linux.

AMG0 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO67867_NLTAM%2C00.html

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Deshpande, Kirti
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).