Re: [ORG-discuss] IPBill / Kickstarting OnionDSL to generate media interest?

2016-10-15 Thread Christian de Larrinaga
Interesting.  What would it take to add in Tor nodes to help scale Tor
as a byproduct?

C

Adrian Kennard wrote:
> Just to add, and in support of an idea like this, all standard A
> broadband connections can be set to L2TP to a remote endpoint so that it
> is really simple for someone to set up a private Internet service like
> this using our broadband service. The costs are the same as normal.
>
> Obviously that service needs to do the Tor exit nodes and so on to
> provide the degree of privacy, but you don't need to set up a whole ISP
> to do this, just a box that does Tor and L2TP somewhere in "the cloud".
>
> Are there any consumer broadband routers that handle being a tor client?
>

-- 
Christian de Larrinaga  FBCS, CITP,
-
@ FirstHand
-
+44 7989 386778
c...@firsthand.net
-


-- 
Please support ORG's work - join and help fund our future:
https://www.openrightsgroup.org/join

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
org-discuss-le...@lists.openrightsgroup.org
or use https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/org-discuss

Re: [ORG-discuss] IPBill / Kickstarting OnionDSL to generate media interest?

2016-10-15 Thread William Waites
Cool. We’ve discussed similar things in the past and I’d be happy to help. I 
would
suggest to have the L2TP/PPPoE concentrator outwith the UK though even if it
might not be strictly necessary due to Tor’s design. For those who are willing 
to
sacrifice stronger anonymity properties for performance, simply landing the
PPPoE session overseas and doing (stateless) encryption would be enough to
make ICRs useless or irrelevant. Obviously that wouldn’t stand up against 
greater
intrusive efforts but would mean that locally collecting detailed flow 
statistics as a
matter of course wouldn’t work. Also agree that onions work better in the press.

As with Adrian, were we (members of HUBS) are facilities-based (we don’t really
do resale of Ma Bell^H^H^H^HBT) happy to arrange for access circuits to be
sent wherever convenient.

Cheers,
-w

P.S. Amusing that the french-canadian idiom “occupe toi de tes onions” roughly
translates as “mind your own business”. But I doubt if Dingledine et al knew 
that.



-- 
Please support ORG's work - join and help fund our future:
https://www.openrightsgroup.org/join

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
org-discuss-le...@lists.openrightsgroup.org
or use https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/org-discuss

[ORG-discuss] IPBill / Kickstarting OnionDSL to generate media interest?

2016-10-15 Thread Gareth Llewellyn
As expected the IPBill is heading onward and we've only got a few steps
left before it becomes law.

As a last ditch attempt to kick up some media interest I'm proposing to
publish a kickstarter for a Proof of Concept broadband product I'm calling
OnionDSL which is specifically designed to undermine parts of the bill;

Preview URL: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1443832821/224433997?
token=508966fe

In essence instead of your DSL connection receiving a real IPv4 / IPv6
address and access to a next hop router to allow bi-directional
communication with the Internet via IP routing you will instead be dropped
into a closed private network that only exposes a Tor bridge.

You configure your home devices to connect to Tor as normal (albeit
specifying to use the bridges) and then you can get online.

This broadband product nullifies most of the more privacy intruding
elements of the Bill even if the Home Office issued any of their new
notices (ICR retention, NSL etc) and should also protect privacy of users
even if my transit / peering / PPP sessions were tapped.

No ICRs (at least nothing useful)
No tracking
NIT tools cannot expose your "real" IP address

Unfortunately this would not be the best thing to sign up for as an
individual (telegraphing you want an ultra-anonymous home Internet
connection, that said, I'd use it on one of my lines) however it *could* be
of use to libraries, shelters, community centers etc if it were to actually
get funded.

The point here is point out that ICRs are trivial to defeat and generate
some media furor over ICRs / make more people aware that Tor can defeat
ICRs.

Before I go ahead (the KS page needs a bit more tidying but am planning on
publishing on Monday) does anyone have any suggestions / objections /
questions?
-- 
Please support ORG's work - join and help fund our future:
https://www.openrightsgroup.org/join

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 
org-discuss-le...@lists.openrightsgroup.org
or use https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/org-discuss