On May 29, 2013 10:48 AM, "Dennis Walker"
wrote:
>
> I possibly wasn't clear! That theorem stands for *that* form of
> flower tower and the restrictions thereby. Very happy to see it beaten :-)
> (I like fives!) I'll see if I can work out what you did,
>
> Dennis
>
My cheat, and three unc
The bottom of this page has some instructions on dividing paper into thirds,
fifths, sevenths, and nths
http://www.origami-resource-center.com/origami-basics.html
For those interested in tessellation/smocking in fabric – the practice seems to
be back in mainstream style and showing up already in Kmart clothing
http://www.kmart.com/jaclyn-smith-women-s-chiffon-blouse-honeycomb-pleats/p-027VA56085112P?prdNo=25&blockNo=25&blockType=G25
Dianne
Here you can find an easy and precise way to divide the side of square in
thirds, fifths, sevenths and so on...
This method is also valid to divide any retangular shape.
http://origami.em.blog.br/archives/origami-divisao-quadrado-papel/
it is in brazillian portuguese but the page has an translator
Hi all,
As coordinator of Pacific Ocean Paperfolders (POP), I often meet people from
different backgrounds and professions who find new ways to use origami. One of
our regular attendees, Anne Kelly-Saxenmeyer, who runs a music and art program
for toddlers called PLAY, became involved with POP be
Using Templates:
These techniques are particularly useful when needing to make multiple copies
of the same fold such as in unit origami OR when you want to make a fold
without the creases needed from positional folds (folds that are only used to
locate the correct position for a nec
It's the Fujimoto's approximation method, you can find how and why it works
in Tom Hull's Project Origami.
You can find a different method to fold fifths in the diagrams of my
puzzles published in The Fold.
Ciao
Francesco
if one prefers precision vs approximation
http://www.youtube.com/watc
From: KAMI PAPERCRAFT WORKSHOPものづくり工房・紙
Clare wrote: I just hope not too many kids buy it/are given it, then
give up origami in disappointment -
I think that it would be more helpful to encourage and advise authors
and publishers than to try t
From: Clare
I recently picked up a 'discount' book at my local paper shop - a beautiful
looking box set with a colourful cover, only to find tacky printed paper and
models full of cutting and requiring a great stretch of imagination to meet
their title! The
Clare wrote: I just hope not too many kids buy it/are given it, then
give up origami in disappointment - we really need to start setting a
standard -but not sure how? Maybe carry an endorsement by NOA/BOS/OUSA etc?
I certainly agree that it would be unfortunate for kids and other
beginne
We often trumpet new, exciting origami books that go a level further, but I
do find it very sad when I pick up a so called 'beginners' book and find it
quite poorly laid out and/or with unsatisfactory models. I recently picked
up a 'discount' book at my local paper shop - a beautiful looking box
>>>Da: Anna
>>>Please note that I didn't come up with the method myself
>>>but learned it somewhere along the way. Not sure who taught it to me
>>>initially but it gives accurate Fifths every time and it even works on
>>>rectangles other than squares.
It's the Fujimoto's approximation method, y
12 matches
Mail list logo
