Re: [Origami] Simple, but Elegant, Models

2012-11-12 Thread Ronald Koh
On 10/11/2012 11:41 PM, Chris Lott wrote: (snip) if only one sense of the term elegance is allowed, then anyone who doesn't know the folding sequence couldn't consider a finished model elegant. (snip) I see pieces of origami that are not just clean, but are elegant (which is more than merely

Re: [Origami] Simple, but Elegant, Models

2012-11-11 Thread Chris Lott
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Dave Mitchell dave.mitch...@virgin.net wrote: Outside origami 'elegant' is often used to mean 'clean' ... as in 'a chair has clean lines'. It doesn't matter how the chair was made. You are describing a quality of the finished result. We're saying the same

[Origami] Simple, but Elegant, Models

2012-11-10 Thread Dave Mitchell
I wrote: This is, of course, the reason why you can't judge the elegance of a design without folding it yourself. Chris Lott replied: I don't see why this is true...we can judge the elegance of a chair or a car or whatever without making it. Why not a piece of origami art? The reason is

[Origami] Simple, but Elegant, Models

2012-10-30 Thread Dave Mitchell
Chris Lott ch...@chrislott.org wrote: I am wondering too: does an elegant folding sequence necessarily lead to an elegant model? Ah ... well ... in origami elegance is a quality of the folding sequence not of the appearance of the finished design. So there is no difference between the two.

Re: [Origami] Simple, but Elegant, Models

2012-10-30 Thread Chris Lott
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Dave Mitchell dave.mitch...@virgin.net wrote: This is, of course, the reason why you can't judge the elegance of a design without folding it yourself. I don't see why this is true...we can judge the elegance of a chair or a car or whatever without making it.

Re: [Origami] Simple, but Elegant, Models

2012-10-30 Thread Gareth Chen
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Malachi Brown malac...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 30, 2012 11:00 AM, Chris Lott ch...@chrislott.org wrote: I definitely see many models that are elegant but difficult (or impossible for me) to fold. But I can't think of examples of the reverse... I can

[Origami] Simple, but Elegant, Models

2012-10-29 Thread Chris Lott
I'd like to embark on folding--and writing a bit about--simple, elegant models. What models are your favorite simple, elegant models? I know this is absolutely subjective and the only rule is, I think, that there are no rules. I'm just curious to see what would fulfill that definition for you.

Re: [Origami] Simple, but Elegant, Models

2012-10-29 Thread Gareth Chen
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Chris Lott ch...@chrislott.org wrote: What models are your favorite simple, elegant models? c -- Chris Lott ch...@chrislott.org In my opinion, Roman Diaz's Origami Essence has some of the most elegant models I've seen. For example, the 3D models, like the

Re: [Origami] Simple yet elegant models

2012-10-29 Thread Anne LaVin
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Rosemary Browne rosemary.brow...@gmail.com wrote: This model comes from Senbazurfrance. It is called Poule de Paques. I am sorry I cannot translate to French; however, I have folded this model many times and_I _have named it Classy Bird and refer to it as such

Re: [Origami] Simple yet elegant models

2012-10-29 Thread oritsuru68
Guillaume Denis is a long time member of the MFPP.

Re: [Origami] Simple, but Elegant, Models

2012-10-29 Thread Leyla Torres
Chris Lott wrote: What models are your favorite simple, elegant models? Here I list a few simple models I love: 1- Nun -Kasahara (One of my all-time favorites ) here is a photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/latrenza/5673579808/ 2- Heart - Ildikó Vass http://www.origamispirit.com/?p=6970 3-