EJBs can be less work to use, but
more work to build, and then you
discover they don't scale and have
to rewrite the underpinnings.
Jaz
Keith Kwiatek wrote:
Hello,
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
How is everyone building their web
WinterSent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 4:17 PMTo:
Orion-InterestSubject: Tools was: There has GOTTA be a BETTER way
At 07:15 PM 11/7/00 +0100, you wrote:
I use JBuilder Enterprise 4 which
does do skeletal work, including matching up home remote
interfaces to the businessmethods
.
-Original Message-
From: M. David Minnigerode [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 4:28 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: Tools was: There has GOTTA be a BETTER way
Adam Winter wrote:
I'm just starting down the EJB road, and I'm looking for tools. My
company is used
al Message-
From: Keith Kwiatek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 11:48 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: There has GOTTA be a BETTER way
Does anyone know if jdeveloper (which is based on Jbuilder)
has the same
functionality
When editing XML files, its not immediately apparent if there is a
problem
I know one thing that help solve that problem. If Sun would publish an
XMLSchema (instead of a DTD) then xml editors (like xml spy) can be used to
create the xml files and catch the mistakes as you make them.
Dave Ford
Hello,
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded programs, or
using automagic tools?
It sure seems like there should be some sort of tool that you can just point
at database tables, and have it
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
Depends on what you are comparing it to--CMP reduces a lot of db code.
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded programs, or
using automagic tools?
We're hand coding.
It sure seems like
er 07, 2003 10:35 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: There has GOTTA be a BETTER way
Hello,
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded
programs, or
using automagic tools?
It sure seems like the
JBuilder 4 Enterprise allows you do build Entity CMP beans this way. You
can connect to a datasource and then select tables and keys for your beans.
It's wild. I'm still getting used to it.
Can anybody else with more experience using this tool give us a little
insight?
Thanks,
Cory
At
. Then EJB will
be the fastest development process...
-Original Message-
From: Keith Kwiatek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:35 PM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: There has GOTTA be a BETTER way
Hello,
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of cod
Keith Kwiatek wrote:
Hello,
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded programs, or
using automagic tools?
Mostly by hand.
It sure seems like there should be some sort of tool that
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Keith Kwiatek wrote:
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded programs, or
using automagic tools?
I use JBuilder Enterprise 4 which does do skeletal work, including
matching up home remote interfaces to the businessmethods of
beans, and it produces
:35 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: There has GOTTA be a BETTER way
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
Depends on what you are comparing it to--CMP reduces a lot of db code.
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded
Keith Kwiatek wrote:
Hello,
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded programs, or
using automagic tools?
It sure seems like there should be some sort of tool that you can just point
at
Does anyone know if jdeveloper (which is based on Jbuilder) has the same
functionality?
Keith
- Original Message -
From: Cory Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: There has GOTTA be a BETTER way
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
owner-orion-interest@orionSubject: Re: There has GOTTA
be a BETTER way
At 07:15 PM 11/7/00 +0100, you wrote:
I use JBuilder Enterprise 4 which
does do skeletal work, including
matching up home remote interfaces to the businessmethods of
beans, and it produces orion-friendly jar files.
I'm just starting down the EJB road, and I'm looking for tools. My
company is
be a BETTER way
Does anyone know if jdeveloper (which is based on Jbuilder)
has the same
functionality?
Keith
- Original Message -
From: Cory Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: There has GOTTA
it in any platform
Oh, and their support is surely the best in the business
It costs $1180 with a year support
-Original Message-
From: Keith Kwiatek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Viernes, 07 de Noviembre de 2003 12:35
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: There has GOTTA be a BETTER way
:17 PMTo: Orion-InterestSubject: Tools was: There
has GOTTA be a BETTER way At 07:15 PM 11/7/00
+0100, you wrote:
I use JBuilder Enterprise 4 which
does do skeletal work, including matching up home remote
interfaces to the businessmethods ofbeans, and it produces
orion
20 matches
Mail list logo
