Jason Daly wrote:
> Eric Sokolowsky wrote:
>> John and everyone,
>>
>> I realize I'm getting into this discussion very late (I've been pretty
>> absent from OSG development lately). We also use Centos (currently at
>> 5.2), and the older package versions is a problem for us as well. I have
>> taken
Eric Sokolowsky wrote:
John and everyone,
I realize I'm getting into this discussion very late (I've been pretty
absent from OSG development lately). We also use Centos (currently at
5.2), and the older package versions is a problem for us as well. I have
taken it upon myself to make RPMs of sev
John Kelso wrote:
> Below is from our sysadmin when I asked him about getting a newer
> version cmake.
>
> Any comments, anyone?
>
> Can we really be the only site having this problem?
John and everyone,
I realize I'm getting into this discussion very late (I've been pretty
absent from OSG dev
Robert Osfield wrote:
Um it was mostly a rant...
Then you didn't read it. There were quite a few intelligent points.
Sure the first part was a rant (I'd call it a counter-rant to yours),
but the rest were well-formed ideas.
I have already said that if CMake 2.4.5 is possible with
Hi Jason,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Jason Daly wrote:
> And your responses show that you didn't grasp the point of mine.
Um it was mostly a rant...
> You seem to still be under the impression that I expect you to continue
> supporting CMake 2.4.5, no matter what. Let me be clear here:
Robert Osfield wrote:
Hi Jason,
Your rant shows you didn't grasp the point of my earlier email.
And your responses show that you didn't grasp the point of mine.
You seem to still be under the impression that I expect you to continue
supporting CMake 2.4.5, no matter what. Let me be clear
Hi Jason,
Your rant shows you didn't grasp the point of my earlier email.
A couple of point that must be made clear. All support costs me time
and therefore income - I don't get to charge anyone for the time it
takes me to do public support, I don't get to charge anyone for making
point releases
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Jason Daly wrote:
> Oh, boy. Where to begin. First of all, I don't have a clue how this
> discussion got out of hand. We started out with a simple issue that showed
> up on a CentOS box. It couldn't compile the recently released OSG 2.8.1
> version. The issue
Jean-Sébastien Guay wrote:
Hi all,
I, for one, would really like to thank you for the time you spend
helping others and contributing, Jason. Since I've been here I've tried
to take example on you and other people who have been active for a very
long time on this list.
I don't really have an
Hi all,
I, for one, would really like to thank you for the time you spend
helping others and contributing, Jason. Since I've been here I've tried
to take example on you and other people who have been active for a very
long time on this list.
I don't really have any opinion on the whole enter
Oh, boy. Where to begin. First of all, I don't have a clue how this
discussion got out of hand. We started out with a simple issue that
showed up on a CentOS box. It couldn't compile the recently released
OSG 2.8.1 version. The issue came down to the fact that CentOS and Red
Hat Enterpri
Hi Jason,
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Jason Daly wrote:
> There's no loss of perpective that I can detect. I think we're all still
> dealing with facts here. The fact is that there is currently no way to
> install CMake 2.6 on a Red Hat Enterprise or CentOS in a way that can be
> easily mai
Hi John,
Try removing your OpenSceneGraph/CMakeCache.text file and the re-run
./configure to see if that kicks CMake into properly checking all the
dependencies.
Also try disabling the aggressive warnings to see if that prevents gcc
spitting out errors when compiling against ITK.
Robert.
On Fri
Hi, Robert,
Robert Osfield wrote:
Hi John and Jason,
Can we get a little perspective on this issue. The build problem was
a warning that we've already fixed in OSG-2.8 branch. As for snooty
admin's, best to leave them alone if helping you out is too much for
them.
There's no loss of pe
Hi!
I missed the earlier note about the cmake problem being fixed in the branch.
Sorry to make noise about a fixed problem. I do test (and squawk) when I
can, but as we all know, life sometimes has other plans.
I installed DCMTK in a local directory, and just tried to rebuild 2.8.1 in a
clean b
Hi John and Jason,
Can we get a little perspective on this issue. The build problem was
a warning that we've already fixed in OSG-2.8 branch. As for snooty
admin's, best to leave them alone if helping you out is too much for
them.
The warning that occurred in OSG-2.8.1 because of something I me
John Kelso wrote:
Below is from our sysadmin when I asked him about getting a newer version cmake.
Any comments, anyone?
I've seen several instances of the typical OSS "bigger, better, faster"
mentality clashing with the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality
of the enterprise distro
John Kelso wrote:
Hi,
I'm a bit surprised by this because as far as I know we have a fairly recent
version of Centos. Are there no other Centos users out there trying 2.8.1?
We're using RHEL 5, but we haven't tried 2.8.1 yet (2.8.0 is meeting our
needs for now).
Is cmake-2.4.8 "really
Below is from our sysadmin when I asked him about getting a newer version cmake.
Any comments, anyone?
Can we really be the only site having this problem?
Thanks again,
John
-- Forwarded message --
We're using a current version of the most recent, one of the most popular
Ente
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:38 AM, John Kelso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a bit surprised by this because as far as I know we have a fairly
> recent
> version of Centos. Are there no other Centos users out there trying 2.8.1?
>
> cat /etc/redhat-release
>>
> CentOS release 5.3 (Final)
>
> which incudes
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Robert Osfield wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Paul
> Melis wrote:
> > First, try this:
> >
> > In applications/osgversion/CMakeLists.txt change ENDIF() to
> > ENDIF(OSG_MAINTAINER)
> > That line looks fishy.
>
> Cmake used to require the the I
Hi,
I'm a bit surprised by this because as far as I know we have a fairly recent
version of Centos. Are there no other Centos users out there trying 2.8.1?
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.3 (Final)
which incudes this version of cmake:
rpm -q cmake
cmake-2.4.8-3.el5.i386
Is cmake-
Hi John.
These aren't errors in the OSG's build, but in the 3rd party library
(ITK) that it's pulliing in. I am very surprised that errors are
popping up. Try reducing the verbosity of OSG warning dectition by
setting OSG_USE_AGGRESSIVE_WARNINGS to OFF using ccmake make.
The other option would
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Paul
Melis wrote:
> First, try this:
>
> In applications/osgversion/CMakeLists.txt change ENDIF() to
> ENDIF(OSG_MAINTAINER)
> That line looks fishy.
Cmake used to require the the IF() ENDIF() matched but this
requirement was dropped, and now the OSG-2.9.x
Hi again,
I made the change in CMakeLists.txt and cmake was happy. It still bombs when
building- it's in the dicom plugin.
We have installed:
rpm -q InsightToolkit
InsightToolkit-2.8.1-5.fc6.i386
There's a large number of repetitious errors., included below.
Any ideas?
Many thanks,
John
John Kelso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> cmake 2.4-patch 8, that came with CentOS release 5.3.
>
> Our systems have been upgraded since my last OSG build, so I'll see if
> there's any relationship. If I get stuck I'll mail again.
>
> Should I see if our system guy can install a newer cmake?
One thing cmake 2.6
Paul Melis wrote:
> Paul Melis wrote:
>
>> John Kelso wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> cmake 2.4-patch 8, that came with CentOS release 5.3.
>>>
>>> Our systems have been upgraded since my last OSG build, so I'll see if
>>> there's any relationship. If I get stuck I'll mail again.
>>>
>>> S
Paul Melis wrote:
> John Kelso wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> cmake 2.4-patch 8, that came with CentOS release 5.3.
>>
>> Our systems have been upgraded since my last OSG build, so I'll see if
>> there's any relationship. If I get stuck I'll mail again.
>>
>> Should I see if our system guy can install a
John Kelso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> cmake 2.4-patch 8, that came with CentOS release 5.3.
>
> Our systems have been upgraded since my last OSG build, so I'll see if
> there's any relationship. If I get stuck I'll mail again.
>
> Should I see if our system guy can install a newer cmake?
First, try this:
I
Hi,
cmake 2.4-patch 8, that came with CentOS release 5.3.
Our systems have been upgraded since my last OSG build, so I'll see if
there's any relationship. If I get stuck I'll mail again.
Should I see if our system guy can install a newer cmake?
Thanks again,
John
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Paul Me
Ulrich Hertlein wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 4/6/09 7:24 PM, John Kelso wrote:
>> After downloading 2.8.1 and typing cmake, I got this error:
>>
>> "The end of a CMakeLists file was reached with an IF statement that
>> was not
>> closed properly. Within the directory:
>> /usr/local/HEV-beta/apps/osg/os
Hi John,
On 4/6/09 7:24 PM, John Kelso wrote:
After downloading 2.8.1 and typing cmake, I got this error:
"The end of a CMakeLists file was reached with an IF statement that was not
closed properly. Within the directory:
/usr/local/HEV-beta/apps/osg/osg-2.8.1/OpenSceneGraph/applications/osgvers
Hi again,
As a stab in the dark to try and fix my memory leak I decided to try using
the latest OSG release.
After downloading 2.8.1 and typing cmake, I got this error:
"The end of a CMakeLists file was reached with an IF statement that was not
closed properly. Within the directory:
/usr/lo
33 matches
Mail list logo
