This sounds reasonable. If all your objects (including the invisible
ones) have the appropriate NodeMask bit set, then they can all be
rendered into your shadow map. Then when you render the final scene,
you would need a specialized shader for rendering the invisible
objects. This shader would
Preet wrote:
Regarding user registration - I never really understood the point of having
your full name being a mandatory thing for the forum sign up. Is it a
courtesy thing? Is it to prevent spam?
I guess it is a courtesy thing, but I think it has been allowed to use an alias
(such
As Ulrich said, it's a bad idea.
osg::ref_ptr works from _withing_ the object (roughly) while
std::shared_ptr works from the outside.
You'll have to use the osg::ref_ptr for everything that is osg:: and
std::shared_ptr for everything else.
There is also the osg::observer_ptr for 'weak'
On a related note, in boost, there is the concept of intrusive pointer
(which I believe has similar semantics to ref_ptr).
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_54_0/libs/smart_ptr/intrusive_ptr.html
It just rang some bells in my memory, so I figured I would post.
Regards,
Judson
On 7/31/2013
Ah... I should have done a little more research. Seems like
intrusive_ptr is already well considered and used within OSG.
Judson
On 7/31/2013 5:55 PM, Judson Weissert wrote:
On a related note, in boost, there is the concept of intrusive pointer
(which I believe has similar semantics to
Hi all,
I am an absolute newbie so I apologise in advance for potential stupid
questions.
I want to output to a Smart TV supporting FULL HD 3d and to a cinemizer
Oled supporting several formats which I do not understand completely. this
link provides the data for the cinemizer
You may also have a look at the osgRecipes project which has an osgtriton
example with patch support.
Wang Rui
2013/8/1 Chris Hanson xe...@alphapixel.com
You might want to contact Frank Kane at Sundog software directly. I don't
think is really appropriate for the OSG users mailing list.
Hi Preet,
On 31 July 2013 18:34, Preet prismatic.proj...@gmail.com wrote:
I second the StackExchange suggestion if the mailing list and forums are
going to be replaced by one system. StackExchange sites are much easier to
search through than relying on Google to look up things in the mailing
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
