As Ulrich said, it's a bad idea. osg::ref_ptr works from _withing_ the object (roughly) while std::shared_ptr works from the outside.
You'll have to use the osg::ref_ptr for everything that is osg:: and std::shared_ptr for everything else. There is also the osg::observer_ptr for 'weak' references. -- Alexandre Vaillancourt 2013/7/31 Ulrich Hertlein <[email protected]> > On 29/04/2013 2:53, Maik Klein wrote: > > I am wondering if it is possible to use the c++11 smartpointer instead of > > osg::ref_ptr? > > Is there any advantage in using the osg::ref_ptr? > > Mixing the two is a bad idea, as they will happily ignore one another ;-) > > One benefit of osg::ref_ptr is that the reference count is part of the > object, so even if > you return a raw pointer at some point you could stuff it back into a > ref_ptr without > things getting stuffed up. > > /ulrich > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org >
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
