John Kelso wrote:
Below is from our sysadmin when I asked him about getting a newer
version cmake.
Any comments, anyone?
Can we really be the only site having this problem?
John and everyone,
I realize I'm getting into this discussion very late (I've been pretty
absent from OSG
Eric Sokolowsky wrote:
John and everyone,
I realize I'm getting into this discussion very late (I've been pretty
absent from OSG development lately). We also use Centos (currently at
5.2), and the older package versions is a problem for us as well. I have
taken it upon myself to make RPMs of
Jason Daly wrote:
Eric Sokolowsky wrote:
John and everyone,
I realize I'm getting into this discussion very late (I've been pretty
absent from OSG development lately). We also use Centos (currently at
5.2), and the older package versions is a problem for us as well. I have
taken it upon
Hi Jason,
Your rant shows you didn't grasp the point of my earlier email.
A couple of point that must be made clear. All support costs me time
and therefore income - I don't get to charge anyone for the time it
takes me to do public support, I don't get to charge anyone for making
point
Robert Osfield wrote:
Hi Jason,
Your rant shows you didn't grasp the point of my earlier email.
And your responses show that you didn't grasp the point of mine.
You seem to still be under the impression that I expect you to continue
supporting CMake 2.4.5, no matter what. Let me be
Hi Jason,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Jason Dalyjd...@ist.ucf.edu wrote:
And your responses show that you didn't grasp the point of mine.
Um it was mostly a rant...
You seem to still be under the impression that I expect you to continue
supporting CMake 2.4.5, no matter what. Let me
Robert Osfield wrote:
Um it was mostly a rant...
Then you didn't read it. There were quite a few intelligent points.
Sure the first part was a rant (I'd call it a counter-rant to yours),
but the rest were well-formed ideas.
I have already said that if CMake 2.4.5 is possible
Oh, boy. Where to begin. First of all, I don't have a clue how this
discussion got out of hand. We started out with a simple issue that
showed up on a CentOS box. It couldn't compile the recently released
OSG 2.8.1 version. The issue came down to the fact that CentOS and Red
Hat
Hi all,
I, for one, would really like to thank you for the time you spend
helping others and contributing, Jason. Since I've been here I've tried
to take example on you and other people who have been active for a very
long time on this list.
I don't really have any opinion on the whole
Jean-Sébastien Guay wrote:
Hi all,
I, for one, would really like to thank you for the time you spend
helping others and contributing, Jason. Since I've been here I've tried
to take example on you and other people who have been active for a very
long time on this list.
I don't really have
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Jason Daly jd...@ist.ucf.edu wrote:
Oh, boy. Where to begin. First of all, I don't have a clue how this
discussion got out of hand. We started out with a simple issue that showed
up on a CentOS box. It couldn't compile the recently released OSG 2.8.1
Hi John,
Try removing your OpenSceneGraph/CMakeCache.text file and the re-run
./configure to see if that kicks CMake into properly checking all the
dependencies.
Also try disabling the aggressive warnings to see if that prevents gcc
spitting out errors when compiling against ITK.
Robert.
On
Hi Jason,
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Jason Dalyjd...@ist.ucf.edu wrote:
There's no loss of perpective that I can detect. I think we're all still
dealing with facts here. The fact is that there is currently no way to
install CMake 2.6 on a Red Hat Enterprise or CentOS in a way that can
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Paul
Melisosg-us...@assumetheposition.nl wrote:
First, try this:
In applications/osgversion/CMakeLists.txt change ENDIF() to
ENDIF(OSG_MAINTAINER)
That line looks fishy.
Cmake used to require the the IF() ENDIF() matched but this
requirement was
Hi John.
These aren't errors in the OSG's build, but in the 3rd party library
(ITK) that it's pulliing in. I am very surprised that errors are
popping up. Try reducing the verbosity of OSG warning dectition by
setting OSG_USE_AGGRESSIVE_WARNINGS to OFF using ccmake make.
The other option
Hi,
I'm a bit surprised by this because as far as I know we have a fairly recent
version of Centos. Are there no other Centos users out there trying 2.8.1?
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.3 (Final)
which incudes this version of cmake:
rpm -q cmake
cmake-2.4.8-3.el5.i386
Is
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Robert Osfield robert.osfi...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Paul
Melisosg-us...@assumetheposition.nl wrote:
First, try this:
In applications/osgversion/CMakeLists.txt change ENDIF() to
ENDIF(OSG_MAINTAINER)
That line looks
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:38 AM, John Kelso ke...@nist.gov wrote:
Hi,
I'm a bit surprised by this because as far as I know we have a fairly
recent
version of Centos. Are there no other Centos users out there trying 2.8.1?
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.3 (Final)
which
Below is from our sysadmin when I asked him about getting a newer version cmake.
Any comments, anyone?
Can we really be the only site having this problem?
Thanks again,
John
-- Forwarded message --
We're using a current version of the most recent, one of the most popular
John Kelso wrote:
Hi,
I'm a bit surprised by this because as far as I know we have a fairly recent
version of Centos. Are there no other Centos users out there trying 2.8.1?
We're using RHEL 5, but we haven't tried 2.8.1 yet (2.8.0 is meeting our
needs for now).
Is cmake-2.4.8 really
John Kelso wrote:
Below is from our sysadmin when I asked him about getting a newer version cmake.
Any comments, anyone?
I've seen several instances of the typical OSS bigger, better, faster
mentality clashing with the if it ain't broke, don't fix it mentality
of the enterprise distros.
Hi John and Jason,
Can we get a little perspective on this issue. The build problem was
a warning that we've already fixed in OSG-2.8 branch. As for snooty
admin's, best to leave them alone if helping you out is too much for
them.
The warning that occurred in OSG-2.8.1 because of something I
Hi!
I missed the earlier note about the cmake problem being fixed in the branch.
Sorry to make noise about a fixed problem. I do test (and squawk) when I
can, but as we all know, life sometimes has other plans.
I installed DCMTK in a local directory, and just tried to rebuild 2.8.1 in a
clean
Hi, Robert,
Robert Osfield wrote:
Hi John and Jason,
Can we get a little perspective on this issue. The build problem was
a warning that we've already fixed in OSG-2.8 branch. As for snooty
admin's, best to leave them alone if helping you out is too much for
them.
There's no loss of
Hi John,
On 4/6/09 7:24 PM, John Kelso wrote:
After downloading 2.8.1 and typing cmake, I got this error:
The end of a CMakeLists file was reached with an IF statement that was not
closed properly. Within the directory:
Ulrich Hertlein wrote:
Hi John,
On 4/6/09 7:24 PM, John Kelso wrote:
After downloading 2.8.1 and typing cmake, I got this error:
The end of a CMakeLists file was reached with an IF statement that
was not
closed properly. Within the directory:
Paul Melis wrote:
Paul Melis wrote:
John Kelso wrote:
Hi,
cmake 2.4-patch 8, that came with CentOS release 5.3.
Our systems have been upgraded since my last OSG build, so I'll see if
there's any relationship. If I get stuck I'll mail again.
Should I see if our system guy
John Kelso wrote:
Hi,
cmake 2.4-patch 8, that came with CentOS release 5.3.
Our systems have been upgraded since my last OSG build, so I'll see if
there's any relationship. If I get stuck I'll mail again.
Should I see if our system guy can install a newer cmake?
One thing cmake 2.6 has
28 matches
Mail list logo
