Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

gmail.com> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt On 4/21/17, 6:37 AM, "Shraddha Hegde" <shrad...@juniper.net> wrote: >Acee, > > >> I don’t see any need to reference RFC 4203 since the Sub-TLV is >>suffici

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Hi Christian, See inline. Thank you. On 23 апр. 2017 г., 18:17 +0300, Christian Hopps , wrote: > > Alexander Okonnikov writes: > > > Hi Christian, > > > > See inline. > > > > Thank you. > > > > -- Best regards, Alexander Okonnikov > > > > On 21

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Alexander Okonnikov writes: > Hi Christian, > > See inline. > > Thank you. > > -- Best regards, Alexander Okonnikov > > On 21 апр. 2017 г., 18:36 +0300, Christian Hopps , wrote: > > Alexander Okonnikov writes: >

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Hi Christian, See inline. Thank you. -- Best regards, Alexander Okonnikov On 21 апр. 2017 г., 18:36 +0300, Christian Hopps , wrote: > > Alexander Okonnikov writes: > > > > no argument about the need of area level flooding - Router LSA with > >

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Alexander Okonnikov writes: >> no argument about the need of area level flooding - Router LSA with >> the max metric will be flooded within the area. >> >> I have read the section 7.2 several times, but I still do not >> understand what is the purpose of the

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

addha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Acee Lindem ><acee.lin...@gmail.com> >Cc: ospf@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt > >Hi Shraddha, > >On 4/20/17, 12:46 AM, "Shraddha Hegde" <shrad...@juniper.net> wrote: &g

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

.. -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:38 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shrad

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

] Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:38 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shraddha, please find my comments below: The draft defines two mechanisms:

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

; Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shraddha, please find my comments below: The draft defines two mechanisms: a) signaling the link overload to the neighbor. The purpose is to advertise the link wit

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shraddha, please find my comments below: The draft defines two mechanisms: a) signaling the link overload to the neighbor. The purpose is to advertise the link with max-metric from both directions. b) flooding the Link-Overload sub-TLV ins

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

<shrad...@juniper.net>; Acee Lindem <acee.lin...@gmail.com> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shraddha, On 4/20/17, 12:46 AM, "Shraddha Hegde" <shrad...@juniper.net> wrote: >Hi Acee, > >The draft does not

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

last call. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 2:28 AM Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shraddha, et al, With respect to section 4.

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

] Sent: 20 April 2017 13:27 To: Ketan Talaulikar Talaulikar (ketant) <ket...@cisco.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; Acee Lindem <acee.lin...@gmail.com> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Ketan, OSPF link overload ha

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

cument. Thanks, Acee > >Rgds >Shraddha > >-Original Message- >From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] >Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 4:02 AM >To: Acee Lindem <acee.lin...@gmail.com>; Shraddha Hegde ><shrad...@juniper.net> >Cc: ospf@ietf.or

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

l.com> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Shraddha, There are also other applications that your draft lists which are TE independent and hence the case for not referring to a specific way for signalling interface-ids which is TE specific.

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Lindem <acee.lin...@gmail.com>; Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shraddha/Authors, I would like to share the following comments and feedback on this draft. 1) I did not understand the moti

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

l.com> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Ketan, We do have traffic engineering applications that require link-overload functionality. Pls refer section 7.2. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Ketan Talaulikar Talaulikar (k

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shraddha/Authors, I would like to share the following comments and feedback on this draft. 1) I did not understand the motivation for the use of link-local scoped RI LSA for the link-overload signa

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

rad...@juniper.net>; Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; Acee Lindem <acee.lin...@gmail.com> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shraddha, The RFC 4203 describes the usage and application of TE LSAs for GMPLS/TE use cases. The

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 4:02 AM To: Acee Lindem <acee.lin...@gmail.com>; Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shraddha, The only non-editorial comment

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

[mailto:ospf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 20 April 2017 04:02 To: Acee Lindem <acee.lin...@gmail.com>; Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shraddha, The only non-edito

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

s of the draft believe that draft has undergone multiple >>revisions/reviews and is ready for WG last call. >> >> Rgds >> Shraddha >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem >>(acee)

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Hi Shraddha, et al, With respect to section 4.1, I agree that matching link endpoints in OSPFv2 requires more information. However, this is a general problem and the remote address should be a separate OSPFv2 Link Attribute LSA TLV rather than overloading the link overload TLV ;^) Thanks, Acee