On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 8:59 PM Lazuardi Nasution wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any example about how to use OVS with Bifurcation driver? I have
> read that with Intel NIC I should create specific VF for that, but with
> Mellanox NIC it is not required to have VF.
Hi
there is a patchset, I hope it ca
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:22 PM Vladislav Odintsov wrote:
>
> UPD2:
>
> I see that only snat/dnat ct zones are deleted and assigned again (link [1]
> from previous mail).
> I’ve added more logging and see that local datapaths hmaps is empty on one
> run and then snat/dnat zones are removed and on
Hi Ihar,
In addition to the findings in-line down below, I have some high-level
questions.
Why does the port announces its readiness with a RARP packet?
Presumably, a CMS will set the migration-destination option on a logical
switch port, then will do something that prompts the the device t
Currently when the user adds an IPsec tunnel port to the
ovs bridge the ovs-monitor-ipsec script will add this tunnel
IPsec-related configuration to the appropriate file and
submit a request to start the IPsec connection for this port
and ignores the request output which can contain an error messag
Add support for matching on geneve header.
Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein
Reviewed-by: Nir Anteby
Acked-by: Michael Santana
---
NEWS | 2 ++
lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c | 58 +++
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
i
Add support for dpdk geneve tunnel offloads.
v2-v1:
- Rebase.
GitHub actions:
v1: https://github.com/elibritstein/OVS/actions/runs/1633157455
v2: https://github.com/elibritstein/OVS/actions/runs/1807027490
Eli Britstein (3):
netdev-dpdk: Add flow_api support for netdev geneve vports
netdev-o
Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein
Reviewed-by: Nir Anteby
Acked-by: Michael Santana
---
lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c
index 94dc6a9b7..edd4e009d 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c
Add the acceptance of geneve devices to netdev_dpdk_flow_api_supported()
API, to allow offloading of DPDK geneve devices.
Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein
Reviewed-by: Nir Anteby
Acked-by: Michael Santana
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/l
A flow may be modified after its initial offload failed. In this case,
according to [1], the modification is handled as a flow add.
For a vport flow "add", the orig_in_port should be provided.
Keep that field in the flow struct, so it can be provided in the flow
modification use case.
[1] 0d25621e
For VLANs, the match of ethernet type should be specified in inner_type
field of the vlan match, and not type field in ethernet match.
Fix it.
Fixes: e8a2b5bf92bb ("netdev-dpdk: implement flow offload with rte flow")
Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein
Reviewed-by: Salem Sol
---
lib/netdev-offload-dpd
DPDK 20.11 introduced an ability to specify existance/non-existance of
VLAN tag by [1].
Use this attribute.
[1]: 09315fc83861 ("ethdev: add VLAN attributes to ethernet and VLAN items")
Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein
Reviewed-by: Salem Sol
---
lib/netdev-offload-dpdk.c | 16
1 fi
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 6:52 PM Limaye, Namrata
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are working on adding P4 support to OVS and we have recently open-sourced
> the patches on the IPDK github -
>https://github.com/ipdk-io/ovs/tree/ovs-with-p4
Hello Namrata,
I've been trying to compile this, b
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 12:21 PM Kumar Amber wrote:
>
> Some specific warning are seen on various systems
> which may not be visible on others but good to add
> such logs to test to avoid test-case failure.
>
> Thw warning only effects the fuzzy tests due to
> more than 1000+ flows being offloading
Ipv6 ttl, label and tos fields are modified without first
pulling/pushing the ipv6 header, which would have updated
the hw csum (if available). This might cause csum validation
when sending the packet to the stack, as can be seen in
the trace below.
Fix this by calling postpush/postpull checksum c
On 7 Feb 2022, at 12:41, Amber, Kumar wrote:
> Hi Eelco,
>
> I have created a patch to add the warning to the system log
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20220207110008.2054074-1-kumar.am...@intel.com/
>
> I am not able to reproduce the warning, it will be good if you can
On 7 Feb 2022, at 12:00, Kumar Amber wrote:
> Some specific warning are seen on various systems
> which may not be visible on others but good to add
> such logs to test to avoid test-case failure.
>
> Thw warning only effects the fuzzy tests due to
> more than 1000+ flows being offloading simul
Hi Eelco,
I have created a patch to add the warning to the system log
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20220207110008.2054074-1-kumar.am...@intel.com/
I am not able to reproduce the warning, it will be good if you can test it and
let me know if something more needs to be
Add
Update the documentation to include details on SystemTap dependency
when enabling USDT probes.
Suggested-by: Adrian Moreno
Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron
---
Documentation/topics/usdt-probes.rst |5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/topics/usdt-probes.rst
b/D
Some specific warning are seen on various systems
which may not be visible on others but good to add
such logs to test to avoid test-case failure.
Thw warning only effects the fuzzy tests due to
more than 1000+ flows being offloading simultanously.
Suggested-by: Eelco Chaudron
Signed-off-by: Kum
On 6 Feb 2022, at 4:58, lic121 wrote:
>> If lldp didn't change, we are not supposed to trigger backer
>> revalidation.
>>
>> Without this patch, bridge_reconfigure() always trigger udpif
>> revalidator because of lldp.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: lic121
>> Co-authored-by: Eelco Chaudron
>> ---
>> lib
20 matches
Mail list logo
