Re: [Owfs-developers] DS1921 Thermochron delayed start doesn't work

2011-03-11 Thread Arthur de Beun
Hi All, I've been trying to figure out how to get the clock setting correct. That is, I would like it to be consistent with what the Dallas/Maxim OneWireViewer reports. I think I may have solved it, but it depends on what is expected. OneWireViewer expects to see the clock in the Thermochron t

Re: [Owfs-developers] Owfs-developers Digest, Vol 58, Issue 12

2011-03-11 Thread Roberto Spadim
thanks 2011/3/11 Roberto Spadim : > hummm :P my ds1820 is floating heehehehehhe > > 2011/3/11 Doug Collinge : >> Yes, Roberto - the DS18B20 datasheet is very definite that the Vdd pin must >> be connected to the ground pin if the chip is to be used in parasitic mode. >> If it is to be used in powe

Re: [Owfs-developers] Owfs-developers Digest, Vol 58, Issue 12

2011-03-11 Thread Roberto Spadim
hummm :P my ds1820 is floating heehehehehhe 2011/3/11 Doug Collinge : > Yes, Roberto - the DS18B20 datasheet is very definite that the Vdd pin must > be connected to the ground pin if the chip is to be used in parasitic mode. > If it is to be used in powered mode then Vdd must be connected to +5V.

Re: [Owfs-developers] Owfs-developers Digest, Vol 58, Issue 12

2011-03-11 Thread Doug Collinge
Yes, Roberto - the DS18B20 datasheet is very definite that the Vdd pin must be connected to the ground pin if the chip is to be used in parasitic mode. If it is to be used in powered mode then Vdd must be connected to +5V. On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 06:52, < [email protected].

Re: [Owfs-developers] patch 7/7 and final remarks

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 11/03/2011 14:34, Vincent Danjean wrote: > I will send one message per patch I applied with some comment and a last > one with global comments and questions. At first, there is no seventh patch. I made a mistake when I counted all patch initially ;-) Some remarks about owfs from a packager poi

Re: [Owfs-developers] patch 6/7

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 11/03/2011 14:34, Vincent Danjean wrote: > I will send one message per patch I applied with some comment and a last > one with global comments and questions. The sixth patch is about linkage. The upstream build-system links to many libraries when creating new libraries and/or programs. This p

Re: [Owfs-developers] patch 5/7

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 11/03/2011 14:34, Vincent Danjean wrote: > I will send one message per patch I applied with some comment and a last > one with global comments and questions. The fifth patch remove a wrongly hack (that seems to be required for FC6 but that is wrong for Debian) about directories for php. I als

Re: [Owfs-developers] patch 4/7

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 11/03/2011 14:34, Vincent Danjean wrote: > I will send one message per patch I applied with some comment and a last > one with global comments and questions. The fourth path ensures here again that perl packages are installed into distribution directories and not local-admin directories. I'm

Re: [Owfs-developers] patch 3/7

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 11/03/2011 14:34, Vincent Danjean wrote: > I will send one message per patch I applied with some comment and a last > one with global comments and questions. The third patch follow the cleanup in manpage from Cyril LAVIER. He does not install all of them, so lintian does not show him all the ty

Re: [Owfs-developers] patch 2/7

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 11/03/2011 14:34, Vincent Danjean wrote: > I will send one message per patch I applied with some comment and a last > one with global comments and questions. The second patch is a hack to ensure that tcl files are installed in distribution-managed directory (ie /usr/lib/tcltk) instead of admini

Re: [Owfs-developers] patch 1/7

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 11/03/2011 14:34, Vincent Danjean wrote: > I will send one message per patch I applied with some comment and a last > one with global comments and questions. The first patch is about a missing semicolon (required in non-debug mode at least). Should be applied upstream. -- Vincent Danjean

Re: [Owfs-developers] Packages for Debian and Ubuntu

2011-03-11 Thread Vincent Danjean
Hi, On 11/03/2011 00:59, Paul Alfille wrote: > I, too, would like to get changes submitted upstream. > > I think the patches often point out problems in the code, and it makes > releasing new version easier because the repackaging is simpler and so > won't lag behind. > > This also would inclu