I'm not using the CVS right now... I goal was to make sure the latest
released version owfs-2.2p0RC.tar.gz was stable for all my systems at
home.
The needed timeout is very dependent to how many clients try to access
the 1-wire bus. I have made a script that shows it's not even enough
with 5 seco
I'm sure we're both using the CVS version.
I found listing a large directory, of asking for individual temperatures worked
when I uppped the timeout.
I haven't yet tried the "cat /1wire/uncached/10*/temperature". Perhaps that call
sums the latency of both the directory listing and the temperature
Hello from Gregg C Levine
This is definitely an interesting case we've got here. And an
interesting test case for both OWFS, and even FUSE, and certainly the
One-Wire technology.
Several questions remain for you Christian:
Question One
Were these tests managed using the contents of CVS? Or did
Nope... 2 seconds isn't enough... Can't tell you why, but it's not
working for me at least..
/Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] owfs]# cat /var/1wire/uncached/1*/temperature
26.5625 20.4375 19.75 15.93759.25 22.0625
0.125cat: /var/1wire/uncached/10.762047000800/tempera
I was incorrect in my earlier note about the polling frequency. The DS2408 has a
latch, accessible through OWFS, that will save the button press. This will
greatly diminish the chance of missing a button press and reduce the polling
frequency.
I'm not sure the DS2408 will run without Vcc power. In
--On 02/13/2006 01:46:34 PM -0500 MarcLavallée wrote:
I'm new to the 1-wire technology.
I'd like to interface over 30 DS2408 on a 1-wire bus, using ordinary
ethernet cables, arranged in a topology of 2 or 3 branches with 10 or 15
daisy-chained devices. The total length of the cables could be ov
Am Montag, 13. Februar 2006 19:46 schrieb Marc Lavallée:
> I'm new to the 1-wire technology.
>
> I'd like to interface over 30 DS2408 on a 1-wire bus, using ordinary
> ethernet cables, arranged in a topology of 2 or 3 branches with 10 or 15
> daisy-chained devices.
>
Branches are a big problem for
Yup, 2 seconds works.
Paul
On Monday 13 February 2006 12:28 pm, Christian Magnusson wrote:
> The problem is in ow_server.c:ServerDir() (for example) where ToServer()
> usually returns VERY quick and the request is put in a queue to be executed
> on the remote-server.
>
> If there are 10 different
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Your latest OWFS - Software
Date: Saturday 04 February 2006 03:56 pm
From: Michael Holzbrecher
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I try since some days to get OWFS run.
I tried to compile the source code owfs-2.1p0RC.tar.gz, but it failed
with error me
On Monday 13 February 2006 01:46 pm, Marc Lavallée wrote:
> I'm new to the 1-wire technology.
>
> I'd like to interface over 30 DS2408 on a 1-wire bus, using ordinary
> ethernet cables, arranged in a topology of 2 or 3 branches with 10 or 15
> daisy-chained devices. The total length of the cables c
On Monday 13 February 2006 01:46 pm, Marc Lavallée wrote:
> I'm new to the 1-wire technology.
>
> I'd like to interface over 30 DS2408 on a 1-wire bus, using ordinary
> ethernet cables, arranged in a topology of 2 or 3 branches with 10 or 15
> daisy-chained devices. The total length of the cables c
I'm new to the 1-wire technology.
I'd like to interface over 30 DS2408 on a 1-wire bus, using ordinary
ethernet cables, arranged in a topology of 2 or 3 branches with 10 or 15
daisy-chained devices. The total length of the cables could be over 100
meters. I need to monitor momentary push-button
On Monday 13 February 2006 12:28 pm, Christian Magnusson wrote:
> The problem is in ow_server.c:ServerDir() (for example) where ToServer()
> usually returns VERY quick and the request is put in a queue to be executed
> on the remote-server.
>
> If there are 10 different read requests to
> /1wire/un
The problem is in ow_server.c:ServerDir() (for example) where ToServer()
usually returns VERY quick and the request is put in a queue to be executed
on the remote-server.
If there are 10 different read requests to
/1wire/uncached/10.x/temperature from 10 different remote-clients,
then it
Thanks, Christian.
We could go back to the old way, but I was trying to coordinate work with the
Link-Hub-E which can completely bomb out.
I think the large directory listing should be ok, since the directory is sent
back one element at a time, which minimizes latency.
I've always wanted to i
I found out that the recently added read-timeout doesn’t
work good at all…
A timeout of 1 second in ow_server.c is too low…
Don’t know exactly why, but I end up with EIO errors when reading
temperatures very often.
Host1: owserver
–d /dev/tty/1 (Slow Linksys router with 1
16 matches
Mail list logo
