On 05.09.2018 11:00, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> Yes, exactly. But that's what a clever designed library can assist the
> application programmer. By requiring him to think about the logical
> abstraction of a whole device first, not just a Onewire slave.
Well, I can't help with "requiring".
But once
Am 05.09.2018 um 10:08 schrieb Matthias Urlichs via Owfs-developers:
>
>> The DS2409 is already transparently supported by owlib.
> Is it?
>
> Last time I checked, slaves behind a DS2409 or two do not show up
> in "owdir /" or "owdir /bus.0" or "owdir /alarm", they do not
> notice when I set
On 05.09.2018 07:45, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> So my advice from pratice is basing all the automatical mechanisms on
> a logical abstraction of a whole peripheral, with the Onewire stuff
> being only a part of a bigger picture.
My main goal with this library is that the instance representing a slave
Am 05.09.2018 um 05:20 schrieb Matthias Urlichs via Owfs-developers:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing a new high-level asynchronous Python library to talk
> to owserver.
>
> It features multiple persistent server connections, transparent
> support for DS2409 couplers, automatic retries when he server is
>
