Folks, this morning I was forced to perform a big switch-over to a pair of
new Win2008 R2 domain controller and file/web/sql server machines.
I have found that SQL Server Management Studio on the workstation machines
does not have permission to access the databases when I use Windows
There was an error displayed but the account name was identical to my login
name.
I was really sure I had used the correct one in the configuration file.
Another red face special.
Apart from that it won't work on my Windows 7 machine as it needs .NET 1.1.
You have to do this on a windows 7
Thanks for all the leads links and advice.
Julijan Sribar's code and application at CodeProject was good for me, and
the idea of adding a link to projects, to allow synchronized version
incrementing in multi-project solutions is great.
And I liked the Albacore vs Nant rants (but I don't use
On 22 March 2011 11:53, Stephen Price step...@littlevoices.com wrote:
Thanks for the pic! :)
That little vent in the corner doesn't look big enough to be very efficient
for cooling. You didn't confirm the vent at the back is the main exhast for
cooling, but I'm assuming so.
I'll check
Depending on your version of Windows 7, there is a freely available
Microsoft image called XP Mode.
This is essentially a copy of XP running from within virtual pc
On Tuesday, 22 March 2011, Peter Maddin petermad...@iinet.net.au wrote:
There was an error displayed but the account name was
Thanks
I tried installing this before and just went around in circles.
It said you need to download and install it.
When it went to install it said it was already installed.
I gave up after a few attempts.
I just tried again and this seemed to go a bit better but the download was
going to take
Hi Greg,
Its been a while since I had this problem but when you moved the databases
to the new server, did it create a whole bunch of additional Schemas under
Security for each database? I've seen it create new schemas for each user
(especially Windows users). Deleting those additional schemas
Hi Greg/Grant,
The issue isn't whether or not the service account has access to the files,
it's whether or not it's been granted permission to access the server and
the databases.
Open SSMS and make sure it's configured as a Login and also that the Login
has access to the database.
Does anyone know of a quick/easy/good util to browse the contents of a
DBF/foxpro table?
--
*David Connors* | da...@codify.com | www.codify.com
Software Engineer
Codify Pty Ltd
Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7) 3210 6269 | Mobile: +61 417
189 363
V-Card:
Hi David,
I haven’t personally tried this, but you might take a look at:
http://www.dbfview.com/index.html.
I personally use 010 Binary Editor (http://www.010editor.com/) for browsing and
editing binary and text files with special and custom format files such as
fixed format data files etc.
try database.net.. Deals with lots of different database sources and can
run from USB stick.
http://fishcodelib.com/Database.htm
http://fishcodelib.com/Database.htmI haven't tried it...
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:47 AM, David Connors da...@codify.com wrote:
Does anyone know of a
Hi Bill
Although we were using VS2010, we had framework 3.5 - which didn't expose
the Embed Interop Types setting.
I tried the project with Framework 4, and changed the Embed Interop Types to
false and it appears to be working now
Thank you heaps!
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From:
Raising property changed events seems like something that most applications
need to do at some stage. C#3 introduced the auto property i.e. public bool
IsBusy { get; set; }
I am surprised that there isn't a way built into the framework to
automatically raise changed events
Anyway, i saw this
Excel
On 23 March 2011 12:40, Grant Molloy graken...@gmail.com wrote:
try database.net.. Deals with lots of different database sources and can
run from USB stick.
http://fishcodelib.com/Database.htm
http://fishcodelib.com/Database.htmI haven't tried it...
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:47
Apparently (according to Brendon Forster :)) All the cool kids are using this.
http://code.google.com/p/notifypropertyweaver/
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of David Burela
Sent: Wednesday, 23 March 2011 1:57 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject:
But I like using a few extension methods pulled from ReactiveUI libraries.
public static TRet RaiseAndSetIfChangedTObj, TRet(this TObj vm,
ExpressionFuncTObj, TRet property, ref TRet backingField, TRet newValue)
where TObj : ViewModelBase {
if
Yeah, it's so damn annoying to have to expand an auto property to do
raised events, but in some cases you need to, most of the time for
RaisePropertyChanges I'd opt to use a extension/helper method that
accepts a lambda:
RaisePropertyChange(()= this.PropertyName);
But I'd only use that in
Caliburn.Micro uses Expressions
public virtual void NotifyOfPropertyChange(string propertyName) {
if(IsNotifying)
Execute.OnUIThread(() =
RaisePropertyChangedEventCore(propertyName));
}
public virtual void
Below is not guaranteed to work, if we inline the set, GetCurrentMethod will
return the wrong method.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of David Burela
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 7:57 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Raising property changed events
I believe it was in this mailing list that we previously confirmed
using GetCurrentMethod, even when included in convoluted ways,
guarantees the method will not be inlined.
Can you show an example where GetCurrentMethod does not return the
expected method?
--
Regards,
Mark Hurd,
On 23 March 2011 15:00, Mark Hurd markeh...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe it was in this mailing list that we previously confirmed
using GetCurrentMethod, even when included in convoluted ways,
guarantees the method will not be inlined.
Gmail says GetCurrentMethod has /not/ been mentioned before
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Mark Hurd markeh...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe it was in this mailing list that we previously confirmed
using GetCurrentMethod, even when included in convoluted ways,
guarantees the method will not be inlined.
Can you show an example where GetCurrentMethod
Hmm, I'll check internally, but I'd be surprised if we give that guarantee.
We're free to change our inlining policy at any time, in fact, we did just that
in 3.5 SP1 x64 which broke a lot of customers who were relying on
Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly() without explicitly turning off inlining
GetCurrentMethod is of little use to us netcf people since it doesn't
exist. In fact, I believe there is no way to get the method name in
netcf for a release build.
David
If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes
will fall like a house of cards... checkmate!
-Zapp Brannigan,
24 matches
Mail list logo
