g
Dr Greg Low
1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile
SQL Down Under | Web: https://sqldownunder.com<https://sqldownunder.com/>
|About me: https://greglow.me
From: Dr Greg Low
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2021 8:38 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: SQL Graph databases
Hi Greg,
We
tnet.com On Behalf
Of Greg Keogh
Sent: Tuesday, 26 October 2021 9:44 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: SQL Graph databases
Dr L,
Very interesting! What do you recommend .NET developers to use when talking to
SQL Server? Another ORM? Plain ADO.NET<http://ADO.NET>? Stored procs?
Using an ORM
Dr L,
Very interesting! What do you recommend .NET developers to use when talking
to SQL Server? Another ORM? Plain ADO.NET? Stored procs?
Using an ORM does keep you at arms length from the DB engine and it
abstracts away differences, but that's a good thing! I've never suffered
from anything lag
gh
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 6:25:31 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: SQL Graph databases
Folks, I spent Sunday afternoon playing around with SQL Server Graph databases,
and as I expected, it all works as advertised. It's pretty neat and the query
syntax is comprehensible to mortals, unlike
ked
EF and added graph support, but it looks like a hobby project.
Is anyone using SQL graph databases in anger? Any comments from the
developer's point of view?
*Greg K*
