Re: [ozmidwifery] 7.30 report

2005-09-05 Thread Sally-Anne Brown
Dear all

Pat Brodie mentioned last week will be on monday night as in tonight - but
obviously will depend on other stuff like the devastation with Katrina.  so
check it out - may be on..

SA

- Original Message - 
From: Andrea Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] 7.30 report


 I have just heard from Denis Walsh that he and some others were filmed by
 the 7.30 Report (ABC) at the Conference last week. The program may go to
 air anytime this week, possibly Tuesday.

 All good stuff!

 Regards,

 Andrea

 -
 Andrea Robertson
 Birth International * ACE Graphics * Associates in Childbirth Education

 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 web: www.birthinternational.com


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


 -- 
 Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.17/84 - Release Date: 29/08/2005





-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.17/84 - Release Date: 29/08/2005

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Re: Breech Babies

2005-09-05 Thread Susan Cudlipp
We had a woman booked for elective C/S for breech - 2 previous svd's.  On 
the table the obs felt that the baby was now cephalic. I asked later if she 
had thought about stopping at that point, response was, well, everyone was 
there and ready for the caesar, the paed was in a bad mood and wouldn't be 
impressed, and the woman was mentally prepped for C/S, also there was always 
the chance that it would turn again before labour began. She told the woman 
that the baby now felt cephalic but the woman did not ask to abandon the 
operation.
How sad it is that major surgery can be performed for no better reason than 
to avoid inconveniencing the theatre staff and paediatrician.


With regard to ECV - with my breech an attempt was made at 36 weeks, no 
preparation or uterine relaxants, it was very uncomfortable and not 
successful.  I had also tried moxibustion for a week or so.
With baby no 3 I felt she was breech at 28 weeks and again at 32 weeks, I 
turned her myself while relaxing in my own bed. It was quite spontaneous on 
my part and I did not 'force' anything or cause any discomfort, merely 
massaged my abdo and 'encouraged' her to turn around, I was amazed and very 
pleased when she did!  I know this was early in gestation but no.1 had been 
breech from 28 weeks so it was in my mind that this one would too.

Sue
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do 
nothing

Edmund Burke
- Original Message - 
From: Helen and Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Re: Breech Babies


I had a friend about 8 years ago who was a primip breech and desperately 
wanted to give birth naturally.  She managed to convince her ob to try 
cephalo-version on the operating table (on a weekday when all the staff 
were there anyway) so that if there had been a placental abruption or some 
other complication, she would have been able to have a caesar.  It worked. 
Seems a bit dramatic but not as bad as just giving the nod to a caesar in 
the first place.


Has anyone else had much to do with cephalo-version?

Helen Cahill

- Original Message - 
From: Judy Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 5:34 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Re: Breech Babies


I have just been surfing this site, some good stuff. I have a
multi with a breech at 36+ wke at the moment and I dearly want
her to be able to birth here.
Cheers
Judy

--- Vedrana Valèiæ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


A very interesting discussion on breech births and midwives:

http://www.radmid.demon.co.uk/breech.htm

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Miriam Hannay
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 6:10 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Re: Breech Babies

I totally understand, Susan about the whole fear of
breech birth. We have a couple of OBs who will 'let'
women birth a breech babe vaginally, but fully
managed, IOL, 16 gauge bores in both arms, hartmann's
up, McRoberts, episi, full extraction. To me this
seems torture. I am a second year Bmid student and
intending to go into independent practice, so am
availing myself of every extra learning opportunity
available.

A fellow student and I (my lovely partner in crime),
attended Maggie Banks' emergency skills workshop in
Melbourne recently which was SO valuable, and we feel
much more comfortable about the possibility now.

I have a dear friend whose first 'catch' as an RM was
an undiagnosed breech at home, so it does happen. We
need to be prepared and develop the skills to handle
this situation. What a shame and potential danger it
is if these skills fall by the way.

Everyone who can should hear Maggie Banks speak, she
dispells fears and demystifies like no-one else.

Regards, Miriam (FUSA)

--- Susan Cudlipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes it was Brenda who wrote that, but I have also
 been a midwife long enough
 to have seen many breech births - back in the UK,
 and delivered a few
 myself.  Not all good, mostly quite 'managed' but at
 least they were mostly
 seen as being manageable vaginally! My own elective
 C/S (nearly 21 years old
 now!) was for primip breech, although I was given
 the choice of vaginal
 birth, I knew just what that would entail within the
 large unit that I was
 obliged to attend - epidural, forceps, episiotomy,
 and I chose not to go
 there, however at that time there was no question
 that I would not be able
 to have VBAC with the next - nowadays that is not
 so.

 A year or so back we had a multi with a breech who
 was lucky enough to see a
 less interventionist OB (as you so rightly guessed
 Melissa :-)) and she
 chose to have a vaginal birth. Of course it had to
 be induced on the 'right'
 day, but was very straight forward. Apart from that
 we really don't see
 them anymore, and at least one of the few docs who
 does do them 

[ozmidwifery] FW: Article re. caesars....

2005-09-05 Thread Denise Hynd





Subject: RE: [MCMgtCte] FW: Article re. caesars


See: http://www.forensic-psych.com/articles/artMedMal.html

A Plaintiff's Verdict: Meador v. 
Stahler and Gheridian -The $1.5 million award to a 
Massachusetts 
woman and her family in Meador v. Stahler and Gheridian3 made news as a rare 
instance of a malpractice judgment based on an allegedly unwanted and 
unnecessary cesarean section rather than a failure to perform such an operation. 
The plaintiff, Mary Meador, did not claim that the procedure was negligently 
performed or that the rare and disabling physical complications that resulted 
from it (which left her largely bedridden and unable to work or meet her family 
responsibilities for several years) were foreseeable. Instead, she claimed that 
the defendant obstetricians had misrepresented the risks of the alternative 
procedure (vaginal birth after prior cesarean) and ignored her persistent pleas 
for this alternative. Moreover, she alleged, they compelled her passive assent 
to the surgery in an emotionally coercive manner while she was progressing 
normally in labor, despite their having previously agreed to such a trial of 
labor. -Because the consequences of the cesarean were unforeseeable, and 
because Meador had signed a consent form for the surgery (to be used in case of 
emergency), this case did not meet the technical requirements specified under 
Massachusetts 
law4 for an action based on informed consent. Instead, the case was brought on 
the theory that the physicians' failure to obtain the patient's informed consent 
constituted substandard, negligent medical care. The forensic psychiatrist's 
expert testimony emphasized that the pro forma signing of a consent form did not 
constitute true informed consent, especially in light of the physicians' alleged 
disregard of the patient's expressed wishes and their inaccurate representation 
of the risks and benefits of the approach she preferred. - The psychiatrist 
also explained to the jury how Meador's life history left her vulnerable to 
experiencing the denial of informed consent as a highly traumatic event. Having 
coped since childhood with serious illnesses in her family, Meador had viewed 
doctors and nurses as nurturing figures who helped her gain control of 
potentially tragic situations. She had learned that choice was still possible 
even amidst illness and death. She had even been inspired to become a nurse 
herself and to teach this discipline to others. Thus, when she experienced a 
sudden loss of choice and control during childbirth, she reacted with intense 
fear and horror and felt she had been betrayed by health professionals, whom she 
now feared and mistrusted. In this way she lost her accustomed strategy for 
coping with life. Moreover, having helped hold her original family together in 
the face of tragic illness, Meador saw the family she had created torn apart by 
her sudden and devastating loss of control in a medical situation. The jury's 
recognition of the importance of the emotional facts of the case was highlighted 
by its awarding almost one-third of the total damages for loss of consortium. 
-Thus, it was not simply the physically disabling consequences of the 
surgery, but the loss of personal decision-making power concerning her body, her 
health, and the birth of her child, that caused Meador to suffer from 
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Similarly, her husband's experience of loss of 
consortium was exacerbated by the physicians' failure to consult him to 
interpret his wife's wishes during labor. Instead of having participated in a 
true informed-consent process, he was left to feel powerless and helpless. In 
this way, forensic psychiatric testimony established a persuasive causal link 
between the lack of informed consent and the physical and emotional damages 
suffered by the patient and her family.

Cheers,

C




Subject: [MCMgtCte] FW: Article re. 
caesars

The Midwife Strikes Back This is 
timely with NCAD next weekend but Imust say Andrew P has his facts wrong. A woman sued an 
OB for an unnecessarycs in the US and this year 
won!Cheers,Subject: Article re. caesarshttp://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,16490659-421,00.htmlOne third of Australian births to be 
caesarsBy Adam 
Cresswell05-09-2005From: 
The AustralianTHE number of 
women giving birth by caesarean section is rising fast, 
andcould soon hit a record of 32 
per cent of deliveries - far higher than incountries such as Britain and New 
Zealand.There are more than 250,000 births a year nationwide, and 
emerging hospitaldata indicates the 
increase in caesarean rates since the mid-1990s may beaccelerating.Sally Tracy, associate professor of midwifery practice 
development at theUniversity of Technology 
Sydney, 
told The Australian yesterday thecalculations were based on trends in hospitals and the 
experiences ofmidwives in 
practice."Judging from the 
trends in tertiary hospitals, the caesarean rates are 

[ozmidwifery] hep C and homebirth

2005-09-05 Thread Lieve Huybrechts
Title: Bericht



Hoi 
friends,

Last week I send 
the question about hep C and homebirth. Since then I got a lot of information 
and I could decide that homebirth was not a problem with some precautions to 
protect ourselves. But I have a problem with my colleagues. We have a practice 
of three midwives and the other two refuse to help the mother, saying that they 
think the risc is to much to take. She was also a drugaddict, but clean now for 
several years. She had recent a partner with unsafe sexual behaviour (several 
partners). 
My colleagues 
say that she is responsible herself for what she got and take the consequences 
of it. I believe that everybody needs a second chance.

They say, 
considering our teamwork that I have to refuse her too. They are angry at 
me.
I feel that 
refusing her is some discimination. 
How should you 
handle this in your practice?

warm 
greetings
Lieve



Lieve Huybrechts
vroedvrouw
0477/740853
www.geboorte-infocentrum.be


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/89 - Release Date: 2/09/2005
 


[ozmidwifery] Pregnancy outcomes for Vic?

2005-09-05 Thread Tania Smallwood








Jut wondering if someone can direct me to the website where
the latest Victorian pregnancy outcomes are? Not an easy one to find Ive
discovered



Tania

x








Re: [ozmidwifery] hep C and homebirth

2005-09-05 Thread Maxine Wilson
Title: Bericht



Lieve
My heart goes out to you as it must be a 
painful and disappointing position to be in with your colleagues. I 
presume you have presented them with the evidence of the risks of infection and 
the appropriate measures to take. Do you have an ethics policy that you 
work by as midwives? To judge someone so harshly for their previous 
behaviour does not seem to be a compassionate way to care. I understand 
that you are probably in your own private practise and so there is no obligation 
to provide care. Do you think it is only because of the infection risks 
that they are upset or are their other issues such as her behaviour, personality 
etc that are being judged. You are in a difficult position and I 
guessthat you need to give them as much information as possible and also 
be able to discuss calmly with them about their fears. I would find it 
hard to stay calm and I guess you would be feeling pretty upset with them. 
Maybe you could also talk about why they are so angry - are they really that 
sure that you areputting their health at risk or do they not approve of 
this type of client, or maybe it hasto do with other issues in your 
practise that have not been dealt with. I and I think many Australian 
midwives would find this situationdifficult to understand asmost of 
us work in the public system and so haveno say about who our clients 
are. We care for whoever needs it. I think also that we identify 
strongly with the origins of midwife which is to be "with women". I 
understand that the literal meaningof vroedvrouw is wise woman (the best 
name for a midwife I have heard yet). Can you appeal to their 
wisdom? Ultimately you will make a decision. It is important to give 
them space to really listen to them and hear what they are also trying to tell 
you - is there something that they are concerned about that you haven't really 
heard? Also a bit of time can make the world of difference - perhaps 
giving them time to digest information before a final decision is made. If 
they will not provide care is there the option that you could care for her in a 
one to one manner? My best wishes to you.
Maxine

- Original Message - 

  From: 
  Lieve Huybrechts 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 12:26 
  AM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] hep C and 
  homebirth
  
  Hoi 
  friends,
  
  Last week I 
  send the question about hep C and homebirth. Since then I got a lot of 
  information and I could decide that homebirth was not a problem with some 
  precautions to protect ourselves. But I have a problem with my colleagues. We 
  have a practice of three midwives and the other two refuse to help the mother, 
  saying that they think the risc is to much to take. She was also a drugaddict, 
  but clean now for several years. She had recent a partner with unsafe sexual 
  behaviour (several partners). 
  My colleagues 
  say that she is responsible herself for what she got and take the consequences 
  of it. I believe that everybody needs a second 
chance.
  
  They say, 
  considering our teamwork that I have to refuse her too. They are angry at 
  me.
  I feel that 
  refusing her is some discimination. 
  How should you 
  handle this in your practice?
  
  warm 
  greetings
  Lieve
  
  
  
  Lieve Huybrechts
  vroedvrouw
  0477/740853
  www.geboorte-infocentrum.be
  --No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by 
  AVG Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/89 - Release 
  Date: 2/09/2005


Re: [ozmidwifery] FW: Article re. caesars....

2005-09-05 Thread Judy Chapman
Probably should send this one to Pesce if you already have not.
Judy


--- Denise Hynd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Subject: RE: [MCMgtCte] FW: Article re. caesars
 
 
 See: http://www.forensic-psych.com/articles/artMedMal.html
 
  
 
 A Plaintiff's Verdict: Meador v. Stahler and Gheridian -
 The $1.5 million award to a Massachusetts woman and her family
 in Meador v. Stahler and Gheridian3 made news as a rare
 instance of a malpractice judgment based on an allegedly
 unwanted and unnecessary cesarean section rather than a
 failure to perform such an operation. The plaintiff, Mary
 Meador, did not claim that the procedure was negligently
 performed or that the rare and disabling physical
 complications that resulted from it (which left her largely
 bedridden and unable to work or meet her family
 responsibilities for several years) were foreseeable. Instead,
 she claimed that the defendant obstetricians had
 misrepresented the risks of the alternative procedure (vaginal
 birth after prior cesarean) and ignored her persistent pleas
 for this alternative. Moreover, she alleged, they compelled
 her passive assent to the surgery in an emotionally coercive
 manner while she was progressing normally in labor, despite
 their having previously agreed to such a trial of labor. -
 Because the consequences of the cesarean were unforeseeable,
 and because Meador had signed a consent form for the surgery
 (to be used in case of emergency), this case did not meet the
 technical requirements specified under Massachusetts law4 for
 an action based on informed consent. Instead, the case was
 brought on the theory that the physicians' failure to obtain
 the patient's informed consent constituted substandard,
 negligent medical care. The forensic psychiatrist's expert
 testimony emphasized that the pro forma signing of a consent
 form did not constitute true informed consent, especially in
 light of the physicians' alleged disregard of the patient's
 expressed wishes and their inaccurate representation of the
 risks and benefits of the approach she preferred. 
 - The psychiatrist also explained to the jury how Meador's
 life history left her vulnerable to experiencing the denial of
 informed consent as a highly traumatic event. Having coped
 since childhood with serious illnesses in her family, Meador
 had viewed doctors and nurses as nurturing figures who helped
 her gain control of potentially tragic situations. She had
 learned that choice was still possible even amidst illness and
 death. She had even been inspired to become a nurse herself
 and to teach this discipline to others. Thus, when she
 experienced a sudden loss of choice and control during
 childbirth, she reacted with intense fear and horror and felt
 she had been betrayed by health professionals, whom she now
 feared and mistrusted. In this way she lost her accustomed
 strategy for coping with life. Moreover, having helped hold
 her original family together in the face of tragic illness,
 Meador saw the family she had created torn apart by her sudden
 and devastating loss of control in a medical situation. The
 jury's recognition of the importance of the emotional facts of
 the case was highlighted by its awarding almost one-third of
 the total damages for loss of consortium. -
 Thus, it was not simply the physically disabling consequences
 of the surgery, but the loss of personal decision-making power
 concerning her body, her health, and the birth of her child,
 that caused Meador to suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress
 Disorder. Similarly, her husband's experience of loss of
 consortium was exacerbated by the physicians' failure to
 consult him to interpret his wife's wishes during labor.
 Instead of having participated in a true informed-consent
 process, he was left to feel powerless and helpless. In this
 way, forensic psychiatric testimony established a persuasive
 causal link between the lack of informed consent and the
 physical and emotional damages suffered by the patient and her
 family.
 
  
 
 Cheers,
 
  
 
 C
 
 


 
 Subject: [MCMgtCte] FW: Article re. caesars
 
  
 
 The Midwife Strikes Back This is timely with NCAD next
 weekend but I
 must say Andrew P has his facts wrong. A woman sued an OB for
 an unnecessary
 cs in the US and this year won!
 
 Cheers,
 
 Subject: Article re. caesars
 
 http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,16490659-421,00.html
 
 One third of Australian births to be caesars
 
 By Adam Cresswell
 05-09-2005
 From: The Australian
 
 THE number of women giving birth by caesarean section is
 rising fast, and
 could soon hit a record of 32 per cent of deliveries - far
 higher than in
 countries such as Britain and New Zealand.
 
 There are more than 250,000 births a year nationwide, and
 emerging hospital
 data indicates the increase in caesarean rates since the
 mid-1990s may be
 accelerating.
 Sally Tracy, associate professor of 

RE: [ozmidwifery] hep C and homebirth

2005-09-05 Thread Melanie Sommeling
Title: Bericht








Hoi
Lieve,



Jammer
dat u collegas zo denken. Het is niet onbekent, naatturlijk, maar het is niet
leuk.



Here
in most nursing professions, sorry ladies I am including midwifery as nursing
here, we are taught the concept of unconditional positive regard. Basically that
everyone should be accepted for who they are and what they are without
judgement. I understand there is a lot of misconception out in the community
about Hep C and about Drug abuse and so forth, but as professionals we should
be more aware of the underlying issues which have made this woman who she is, not
judge her for the life she has led. If they would be faced with her in an emergency
situation, where she was birthing in lift stuck on the fourth floor of a
building would they just step back and let her birth alone. I am just a student
and anyone feel free to put me back in my place, but I believe that your colleagues
should have a hard look at their ethics before they take on anymore mothers, once
you start to discriminate where does it end?



My
two bobs worth. 



Sterkte
Lieve u bent een bezondere vrouw met een groote hart. 



Groetjes



Melanie









From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au [mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of Lieve Huybrechts
Sent: Tuesday, 6 September 2005
00:26
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] hep C and
homebirth







Hoi friends,











Last week I send the question about hep C and homebirth.
Since then I got a lot of information and I could decide that homebirth was not
a problem with some precautions to protect ourselves. But I have a problem with
my colleagues. We have a practice of three midwives and the other two refuse to
help the mother, saying that they think the risc is to much to take. She was
also a drugaddict, but clean now for several years. She had recent a partner
with unsafe sexual behaviour (several partners). 





My colleagues say that she is responsible herself for what
she got and take the consequences of it. I believe that everybody needs a
second chance.











They say, considering our teamwork that I have to refuse her
too. They are angry at me.





I feel that refusing her is some discimination. 





How should you handle this in your practice?











warm greetings





Lieve





















Lieve Huybrechts

vroedvrouw

0477/740853



www.geboorte-infocentrum.be










--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/89 - Release Date: 2/09/2005
 

Re: [ozmidwifery] Pregnancy outcomes for Vic?

2005-09-05 Thread Andrea Bilcliff



Hi Tania,

Try http://www.health.vic.gov.au/perinatal/pubs.htm

Hope that helps,
Andrea Bilcliff

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Tania 
  Smallwood 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 9:01 
  AM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Pregnancy outcomes 
  for Vic?
  
  
  Jut wondering if someone can 
  direct me to the website where the latest Victorian pregnancy outcomes 
  are? Not an easy one to find I’ve 
  discovered…
  
  Tania
  x


Re: [ozmidwifery] hep C and homebirth

2005-09-05 Thread Alesa Koziol
Title: Bericht



Hi Lieve
It is a shame that your colleagues feel so strongly 
against supporting this woman, but in a group practice I understand how 
sometimes there could be conflict over clients. However I wonder if they would 
be asnegative about accepting someone with Hep B?? All the same 
precautions need to be considered for both the infant and midwives caring for 
the woman.
On a another note, earlier this year we had a Hep C 
positive woman give birth to her premature infant. We therefore were handling 
her breastmilk for many weeks. This woman received Hep C from her mother at 
birth, so was infected through no fault of her own... does the route of 
infection really matter? I think not. Surely as clinical practitioners we are 
accountable for our care. This must be providedin a non judgmental manner 
to the woman despite where our personal prejudices might lie, afterall no one is 
perfect:)
Cheers
Alesa

Alesa KoziolClinical Midwifery EducatorMelbourne

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Lieve Huybrechts 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 12:26 
  AM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] hep C and 
  homebirth
  
  Hoi 
  friends,
  
  Last week I 
  send the question about hep C and homebirth. Since then I got a lot of 
  information and I could decide that homebirth was not a problem with some 
  precautions to protect ourselves. But I have a problem with my colleagues. We 
  have a practice of three midwives and the other two refuse to help the mother, 
  saying that they think the risc is to much to take. She was also a drugaddict, 
  but clean now for several years. She had recent a partner with unsafe sexual 
  behaviour (several partners). 
  My colleagues 
  say that she is responsible herself for what she got and take the consequences 
  of it. I believe that everybody needs a second 
chance.
  
  They say, 
  considering our teamwork that I have to refuse her too. They are angry at 
  me.
  I feel that 
  refusing her is some discimination. 
  How should you 
  handle this in your practice?
  
  warm 
  greetings
  Lieve
  
  
  
  Lieve Huybrechts
  vroedvrouw
  0477/740853
  www.geboorte-infocentrum.be
  --No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by 
  AVG Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/89 - Release 
  Date: 2/09/2005


Re: [ozmidwifery] Pregnancy outcomes for Vic?

2005-09-05 Thread Andrea Quanchi
the victorian perinatal data collection website 
x-tad-biggerwww.health.vic.gov.au//x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerperinatal/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger/pdcu.htm
/x-tad-bigger
On 06/09/2005, at 9:01 AM, Tania Smallwood wrote:

x-tad-biggerJut wondering if someone can direct me to the website where the latest Victorian pregnancy outcomes are?  Not an easy one to find I’ve discovered…/x-tad-bigger
x-tad-bigger /x-tad-bigger
x-tad-biggerTania/x-tad-bigger
x-tad-biggerx/x-tad-bigger


Re: [ozmidwifery] Pregnancy outcomes for Vic?

2005-09-05 Thread kflora
Tania try

http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Births_in_Victoria_1999-2000?OpenDocument
 

or do a search for perinatal statistics victoria


Cheers,
Katrina



 Tania Smallwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Jut wondering if someone can direct me to the website where the latest
 Victorian pregnancy outcomes are?  Not an easy one to find I've 
 discovered.
 
  
 
 Tania
 
 x
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.