https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ---
Could you please post updated Spec and SRPM links so that fedora-review can
process them?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Package does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376635
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rosser@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376635
Bug ID: 1376635
Summary: Review Request: ostrichriders - Knights flying on
ostriches compete against other riders
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360258
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fedmsg-atomic-composer-2016.2-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fedmsg-atomic-composer-2016.2-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Atherton ---
New version 1.1.1 released today
Spec: https://cjatherton.fedorapeople.org/xorg-x11-drv-amdgpu.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373487
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369688
--- Comment #10 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #9)
> (In reply to Charalampos Stratakis from comment #8)
> > Also a correction to my previous comment.
> >
> > Please consider
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362487
--- Comment #11 from Tim Flink ---
I installed the libphutil and arcanist packages from these reviews into a clean
f26 chroot and php-cli is installed with arcanist with no issue. If I use the
older packages that are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pycodestyle-2.0.0-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4461dd7a21
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pycodestyle-2.0.0-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d87d3b3103
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pycodestyle-2.0.0-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dce2f89dec
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(lmac...@redhat.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376149
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
(In reply to Jason Tibbitts from comment #2)
> For the record, the weird permission thing is because my umask is 007, which
> is the Posix ACL group scheme with default privacy. The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375765
--- Comment #2 from Eric Smith ---
koji scratch build for Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15640020
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375765
--- Comment #1 from Eric Smith ---
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/yosys/yosys.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/yosys/yosys-0.6.0-1.20160909git5199aaf.fc24.src.rpm
aarch64 problem turned out
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968136
Bug 968136 depends on bug 1367518, which changed state.
Bug 1367518 Summary: Review Request: async-http-client1 - Asynchronous Http
Client for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367518
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367518
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
async-http-client1-1.9.39-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367518
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376149
--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts ---
For the record, the weird permission thing is because my umask is 007, which is
the Posix ACL group scheme with default privacy. The permissions wouldn't be
weird if building an srpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376149
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376149
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264546
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376511
Stuart Campbell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376511
Bug ID: 1376511
Summary: Review Request: nexus - NeXus scientific data file
format
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369688
--- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to Charalampos Stratakis from comment #8)
> Also a correction to my previous comment.
>
> Please consider building the package in a timeframe of 2+ weeks, so that
> enough
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373486
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369688
--- Comment #8 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
Also a correction to my previous comment.
Please consider building the package in a timeframe of 2+ weeks, so that enough
people will have updated their F23 systems, in order
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
--- Comment #15 from Pavel Raiskup ---
(In reply to Pavel Raiskup from comment #12)
> TBH, I have no idea what Gnome Software is so I'm not the best
> person to write the patch. If you can help here, I can include that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
--- Comment #14 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Thanks for the links Víťo, but sorry - I have zero motivation in this stuff
now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369688
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376450
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||182235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376450
Bug ID: 1376450
Summary: Review Request: libdvbpsi - Library for MPEG TS and
DVB PSI tables decoding and generation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
Tomas Mraz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tm...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363923
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework4.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework4-4.1.9-1.fc24.src.rpm
Task info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Blocked FE-Legal because the header contains structures related to possibly
patented format. I expect it's more around mux than codec, but need to be
confirmed. Also there
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||182235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1376438
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376438
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1376436
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376438
Bug ID: 1376438
Summary: Review Request: dvblast - Simple and powerful
streaming application
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376412
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1376437
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376437
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1376389
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376407
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1376437
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376437
Bug ID: 1376437
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-fatih-color - Color
package for Go (golang)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
Bug ID: 1376436
Summary: Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary
structures such as specified by MPEG, DVB, IETF
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
--- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Pavel Raiskup from comment #12)
> > 2. It is good idea to include AppData file in package, to make this plugin
> > visible in Gnome Software.
>
> TBH, I have no idea what
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376407
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1376412
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376412
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1376389
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376412
Bug ID: 1376412
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mattn-go-colorable -
Colorable writer for windows.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376407
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1376389
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376407
Bug ID: 1376407
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mattn-go-isatty - isatty
for golang
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
--- Comment #12 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Thanks for having a look!
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #11)
> 1. I consider good habit to include vim- prefix in vim plugin package name.
That's one of the notes I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375986
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1376389
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376387
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1376389
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211821
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1376389
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376387
Bug ID: 1376387
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-Unknwon-com - Commonly
used functions for the Go programming language
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211821
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
--- Comment #15 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd-0.2.999-1.git14f6283.fc24.src.rpm
koji scratch build for f26:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
--- Comment #10 from Pavel Raiskup ---
FTR: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/91
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
--- Comment #9 from Pavel Raiskup ---
FYI: https://github.com/praiskup/syntastic-rpm/commit/fa3a37e273a538
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374024
--- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
1) The keyword here "Upstream" is not correct for this bugzilla, hence I
removed it.
2) I missed to ask do you want to add this package to epel7. If no them remove
all if...else
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #19 from Tomas Repik ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #18)
> [!]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
> Missing "python_provide" and:
> %check
> %{__pythonX} setup.py test
> or add a
72 matches
Mail list logo