https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565367
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-djinn-ghc-0.0.2.3-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-72bf54ab64
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565367
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565367
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-djinn-ghc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565367
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564716
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565113
--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-asana
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558683
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Group|private |
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565367
Bug ID: 1565367
Summary: Review Request: ghc-djinn-ghc - Generate Haskell code
from a type. Bridge from Djinn to GHC API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565367
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26275787
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564684
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564684
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-monad-journal-0.8.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-888d6d6e72
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564716
--- Comment #3 from Michal Ambroz ---
Spec URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org//dionaea.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rebus.fedorapeople.org//dionaea-0.6.0-6.20180326git1748f3b.fc27.src.rpm
- fix logrotate
- create user
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564682
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-djinn-lib-0.0.1.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3d0f9e4aa8
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564682
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564678
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-fclabels-2.0.3.3-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1daa2eac57
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564678
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549003
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-libevdev-0.4-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a6c481419b
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #20 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
So basically you export "tabrmd_rw_inherited_unix_stream_sockets()" in
tabrmd.if and then you call "optional_policy(`
tabrmd_rw_inherited_unix_stream_sockets(dbusd_system_t) ')" in dbus.te
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #19 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
typo's
##
##Use and inherit tabrmd file descriptors.
##
##
##
##Domain allowed access.
##
##
#
interface(`tabrmd_use_fds',`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #18 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
I other words this also demonstrates how the "selinux-policy modularization"
effort lacks. Even now you have to ideally add changes to selinux-policy
(dbus.te and file_contexts.subs_dist) to get
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #17 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
Oops i am wrong
You should add a tabrmd_rw_inherited_unix_stream_sockets() interface to
tabrmd.if
and them call that in dbus.if instead
##
##
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #16 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to dac.override from comment #15)
> it should be clarified because it is questionable.
>
> If a "system_dbusd_domain" would need this permission then the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #15 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
it should be clarified because it is questionable.
If a "system_dbusd_domain" would need this permission then the permission would
have been enclosed with "system_dbusd_domain()"
Looking at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564716
--- Comment #2 from Michal Ambroz ---
Spec URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org//dionaea.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rebus.fedorapeople.org//dionaea-0.6.0-5.20180326git1748f3b.fc27.src.rpm
Hello Robert Andre,
thank you very much for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #14 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to dac.override from comment #13)
> also this should be investigated reproduced:
>
> https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-abrmd/blob/1.x/selinux/tabrmd.te#L20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562650
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-flask-babelex-0.9.3-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560834
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
ocaml-sha-1.12-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #13 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
also this should be investigated reproduced:
https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-abrmd/blob/1.x/selinux/tabrmd.te#L20
Its definitely not "rw_stream_socket_perms", if anything it is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #12 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to dac.override from comment #10)
> redundant:
> https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-abrmd/blob/1.x/selinux/tabrmd.te#L12
>
> No i mean that you should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #11 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
redudant:
https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-abrmd/blob/1.x/selinux/tabrmd.te#L18
the system_dbusd_t type is already enclosed with "dbus_system_domain()", no
need to "import" it again with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #10 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
redundant:
https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-abrmd/blob/1.x/selinux/tabrmd.te#L12
No i mean that you should probably populate that file with at least a minimal
set of interfaces to interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #9 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to dac.override from comment #4)
> tpm2-abrmd-1.2.0/selinux/tabrmd.te:
>
> allow tabrmd_t self:unix_dgram_socket { create_socket_perms };
>
> redundant:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #8 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> - Add the LICENSE file with %license in %install
>
> - Own these directories:
>
> [!]: Package must own all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #7 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> Thanks Lukas, I'm not a SELinux specialist so I didn't take this package,
> I''ll finish the review now.
>
Thanks a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #6 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/martinezjavier/tpm2-abrmd-selinux/master/tpm2-abrmd-selinux.spec
Excuse me but I believe that this spec is wrong:
The tabrmd.if file should be installed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563184
--- Comment #5 from cl...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/clime/rpkg-util/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00739073-rpkg-util/rpkg-util.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #5 from dac.overr...@gmail.com ---
tabrmd.fc: arguably a bug in selinux-policy:
/usr/local/sbin/tpm2-abrmd --
gen_context(system_u:object_r:tabrmd_exec_t,s0)
ideally an entry should be added to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
dac.overr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dac.overr...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564206
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Add the LICENSE file with %license in %install
- Own these directories:
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565113
--- Comment #2 from Stephen Gallagher ---
Will do, thanks. I missed that UNKNOWN; it was a holdover from pyp2rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565113
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565097
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564835
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
> I tried the above. However I am still using Fedora 27 in my laptop, and with
> the forgeurl way, I cannot build even the srpm package using `rpm -bs`. I
> believe it is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557371
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #45
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563184
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
Review notes:
[x] Package is named appropriately
[x] Licensing is correctly noted and license files are correctly installed
[x] Packaging follows Fedora Python Packaging Guidelines
[!]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380826
Itamar Reis Peixoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-flask-security-3.0.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-48f664b3ed
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380826
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380826
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
python-flask-security-3.0.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-48f664b3ed
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
--- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5658
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5659
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564652
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3-lxc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564649
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lua-lxc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557371
--- Comment #44 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-openjdk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561628
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564550
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-import-local
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564272
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-klauspost-compress
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550317
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask-security
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563184
--- Comment #3 from cl...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/clime/rpkg-util/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00738939-rpkg-util/rpkg-util.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564684
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-monad-journal
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564683
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-ghc-syb-utils
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564682
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-djinn-lib
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564678
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-fclabels
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561638
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561631
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565113
Bug ID: 1565113
Summary: Review Request: python-asana - Asana API client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595
--- Comment #1 from Lukas Vrabec ---
Hi All,
I reviewed SELinux security policy for tpm2-abrmd and both spec file and
policy looks good to me, it reflects IndependentPolicy guidelines.
Thanks,
Lukas.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565097
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1564801
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565097
Bug ID: 1565097
Summary: Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-ModuleMetadata -
Role for plugins that use Module::Metadata
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563184
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package build fails on %check section:
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.oJ7Crn
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd rpkg-util-1.0.git.198.d77c2b9
+ FULL=1
+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564500
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564500
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
For the firts set of the bundled packages, please add a comment about them not
being in Fedora yet (probably a TODO comment). In the meantime, you can send
the list to python-devel as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564500
--- Comment #2 from Michal Cyprian ---
Done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564206
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Runge ---
updated
I added the license file (missing in docs (ahem), and also added the examples.
I can not find the issue you mentioned with source0, as I was sure to use it
already in the way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558362
--- Comment #5 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RussianFedora/openhantek/master/openhantek.spec
SRPM URL:
77 matches
Mail list logo