https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594430
--- Comment #4 from W. Michael Petullo ---
Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/python-ROPGadget.spec
SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/python-ROPGadget-5.4-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description:
ROPGadget lets you search your gadgets on your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519785
--- Comment #22 from Ben Rosser ---
No worries, it happens sometime-- just wanted to make sure you were aware. :)
Anyway, I'm sorry, but it looks like there are (now?) more bundled dependencies
under src/editor/libs that I seem to have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595948
Bug ID: 1595948
Summary: Review Request: mingw-vulkan-validation-layers - MinGW
Windows vulkan-validation-layers library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595947
Bug ID: 1595947
Summary: Review Request: mingw-vulkan-loader - MinGW Windows
vulkan-loader library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595945
Bug ID: 1595945
Summary: Review Request: mingw-vulkan-headers - MinGW Windows
vulkan-headers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590921
--- Comment #11 from Steve ---
Dependency golang-github-pkg-sftp requires a bump with upstream to support
restic. Submitted a PR to update it.
The restic package needs an update to use WithMaxRetries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595943
Bug ID: 1595943
Summary: Review Request: mingw-spirv-tools - MinGW Windows
spirv-tools
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595941
Bug ID: 1595941
Summary: Review Request: mingw-spirv-headers - MinGW Windows
spirv-headers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595940
Bug ID: 1595940
Summary: Review Request: mingw-glslang - MinGW Windows glslang
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594313
--- Comment #13 from jiri vanek ---
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-openjdk/c/1ae669ee38b50409dd95eb5be6c57066a0986fbd?branch=java-11-openjdk
Spec URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/java-11-openjdk/java-11-openjdk.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594313
--- Comment #12 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #6)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #3)
> > > Source0: jdk-jdk-jdk-%{majorver}+%{buildver}.tar.xz
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594313
--- Comment #11 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #2)
> Patch6: systemLcmsAndJpgFixFor-f0aeede1b855.patch
>
> We should start sticking to a better naming scheme for patches. This one is
> an upstream bug and,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519785
--- Comment #21 from j...@kcore.org ---
In all honesty, this was a major fsck'up on my end. I've repushed the correct
file (I thought I hadn't pushed it out, but appareantely I did).
In the future I'll work on branches, not on master ;)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594313
--- Comment #10 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #1)
> This:
>
> %global _privatelibs
> libjsoundalsa[.]so.*|libsplashscreen[.]so.*|libawt_xawt[.]so.*|libjawt[.]so.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594313
--- Comment #9 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #8)
> (In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #7)
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27877911 scratch build.
>
> That built successfully.
Of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519785
--- Comment #20 from Ben Rosser ---
Just a heads up;
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jdeluyck/notepadqq-packaging/master/Fedora/notepadqq.spec
seems to have git merge conflict markers in it... e.g.:
===
>>> upstream/master
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595420
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595420
--- Comment #6 from Alois Mahdal ---
Spec URL: http://file.vornet.cz/tmp/fedora-submit-ydiff/r4/ydiff.spec
SRPM URL:
http://file.vornet.cz/tmp/fedora-submit-ydiff/r4/ydiff-1.1-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description:
Term based tool to view colored,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595420
--- Comment #5 from Alois Mahdal ---
You're right, I misunderstood. I don't really need EPEL so I'll drop the py2
stuff. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595420
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- You misunderstand me: only package the Python 3 lib, Py2 is not needed. Or,
in the case you want to support current EPEL, make a conditional with
%bcond_without python3 to build Py3 for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519785
--- Comment #19 from j...@kcore.org ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jdeluyck/notepadqq-packaging/master/Fedora/notepadqq.spec
SRPM URL: https://kcore.org/tmp/notepadqq-1.4.8-2.fc28.src.rpm
Changelog:
- Corrected date and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595420
--- Comment #3 from Alois Mahdal ---
Spec URL: http://file.vornet.cz/tmp/fedora-submit-ydiff/r1/ydiff.spec
SRPM URL:
http://file.vornet.cz/tmp/fedora-submit-ydiff/r1/ydiff-1.1-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description:
Term based tool to view colored,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595420
--- Comment #2 from Alois Mahdal ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - You should package it with Python 3 not Python 2. Python 2 will be phased
> out from Fedora near 2020:
>
> - You should include the Python provide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590431
--- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Seems these rpmlint errors are present on the default qemu package as well, so
maybe we can overlook these??
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595644
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559864
Sachidananda Urs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(s...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #7 from Sachidananda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595644
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-UUID-URandom
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595658
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slibtool
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538824
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-grabbit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582829
Timothée Floure changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585565
--- Comment #14 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- [!]: Packages are noarch unless they use JNI
Note: shaman subpackage is not noarch. Please verify manually
Your package should be noarch.
BuildArch: noarch
- Your .desktop file is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594313
--- Comment #8 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #7)
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27877911 scratch build.
That built successfully.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577011
--- Comment #10 from Peter Oliver ---
It turns out that it's possible to explicitly request sponsorship by raising an
issue at https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585565
--- Comment #13 from Mohammed Isam ---
Spec URL: https://mohammedisam.fedorapeople.org/shaman.spec
SRPM URL: https://mohammedisam.fedorapeople.org/shaman-1.0-5.fc28.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585565
--- Comment #12 from Mohammed Isam ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #11)
> I can't find these icons anywhere. There's no shaman.appdata.xml or
> shaman.desktop either. Are you sure you uploaded the right archive to your
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585565
--- Comment #11 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Still doesn't work:
+ cp -p shaman-256.png
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/shaman-1.0-4.fc29.x86_64/usr/share/icons/hicolor/256x256/apps/shaman.png
BUILDSTDERR: cp: cannot stat 'shaman-256.png': No
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481628
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner ---
libqrencode needs unbundling, too. There's a package qrencode-libs in Fedora.
https://fukuchi.org/works/qrencode/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576413
--- Comment #22 from Marian Csontos ---
Hi Neal, have you found some time to look at this?
NOTE: There is a new boom version 0.9 - this is the same as the previously
built version except the version and one small patch.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585565
--- Comment #10 from Mohammed Isam ---
Spec URL: https://mohammedisam.fedorapeople.org/shaman.spec
SRPM URL: https://mohammedisam.fedorapeople.org/shaman-1.0-4.fc28.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585565
--- Comment #9 from Mohammed Isam ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #8)
> - Build error:
> Preparing build tree
> mkdir -p build
> Creating info file from texi source
> makeinfo info/shaman.texi
> BUILDSTDERR: make:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595658
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369465
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369471
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yguen...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343895
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595644
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595658
Bug ID: 1595658
Summary: Review Request: slibtool - A skinny libtool
implementation, written in C
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595420
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595644
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1595478
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595644
Bug ID: 1595644
Summary: Review Request: perl-UUID-URandom - UUIDs based on
/dev/urandom
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595493
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559864
Sahina Bose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sab...@redhat.com,
|
51 matches
Mail list logo
