https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885430
--- Comment #7 from Carl George 鸞 ---
> as the code contains some snippets of OpenSSL libcrypto.
If this package is going to bundle openssl (even if only partially), there are
two MUST requirements [0].
1. Add the line `Provides:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887621
--- Comment #11 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #10)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #9)
> > You'd want to adjust the build script to set the soversion to match version.
> > Otherwise the generated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889105
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dialect
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887621
--- Comment #10 from Davide Cavalca ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #9)
> You'd want to adjust the build script to set the soversion to match version.
> Otherwise the generated dependency would be broken or otherwise wrong.
>
> You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889387
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Okay, fedora-review is busted, because somebody broke rawhide.
Last question: why only "Recommends: ncurses-base >= 6.2" and not "Requires"?
Does the ncurses-base package only provide optional
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886458
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
Sure, I'll do the other review once this package has been imported and built.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889387
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini ---
I have one question:
%if !%{build_terminfo}
tic -xe alacritty,alacritty-direct
%{crate}-%{version_no_tilde}/extra/alacritty.info \
-o %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/terminfo
%endif
This means that "if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887621
--- Comment #9 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #8)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #4)
> > >
> > > About the static libraries: folly doesn't have a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867290
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c508531951 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867290
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-10f5ee1341 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867290
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887621
--- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #6)
> (In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #4)
> >
> > About the static libraries: folly doesn't have a stable ABI, by design, so
> > it doesn't seem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889104
--- Comment #9 from Lyes Saadi ---
> I recommend relaxing the dependency in setup.py instead and submitting a pull
> request / patch upstream.
I can see why. I'll make sure to patch the setup.py to do that before
importing.
We can never be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888973
--- Comment #1 from Andy Mender ---
Looks good in general, but the "docs" dir is too big and should be split off
into its own -doc subpackage.
Full review below:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888973
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888975
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888975
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888963
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888452
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867290
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-10f5ee1341 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-10f5ee1341
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888963
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888452
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889072
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885430
--- Comment #6 from giovanni.cabi...@intel.com ---
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/qatlib/v20_08/rpm/qatlib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/qatlib/v20_08/rpm/qatlib-20.08.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
>The license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867290
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c508531951 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c508531951
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867290
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-bce6bf5d10 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bce6bf5d10
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886458
--- Comment #2 from Javier Martinez Canillas ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #1)
Thanks a lot for the review!
[snip]
>
> SHOULD:
>
> [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
> file from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867290
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889768
Bug ID: 1889768
Summary: Review Request: oraculum - Backend and API for Fedora
QA Dashboard
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889387
--- Comment #2 from Stefano Figura ---
Thanks for the review but especially for all the advice! Thanks to your
guidance I have learned so much in the last couple of days.
I have updated the spec file and the source RPM. Hopefully I have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889362
--- Comment #6 from Tomáš Hrnčiar ---
Updated
Spec:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/thrnciar/python-fastjsonschema/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01713797-python-fastjsonschema/python-fastjsonschema.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889705
Bug ID: 1889705
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Net-LDAP - Net::LDAP
subclass for testing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889362
--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok ---
Now %pypi_name is python-fastjsonschema which is also not consistent with
reality, because the pypi_name is fastjsonschema. Also, the package name is
python3-python-fastjsonschema whch is not what the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889652
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1269538 (IoT)
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889652
Bug ID: 1889652
Summary: Review Request: python-adafruit-pureio - Python access
to Linux IO including I2C and SPI
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889634
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1889431
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889431
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1889634
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889634
Bug ID: 1889634
Summary: Review Request: python-zeep - Modern and fast Python
SOAP client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889072
--- Comment #4 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
> Is the fork just a different URL or is it a different project? From the
> GitHub page it seems like it's a thin wrapper around the original argyllcms
> located here: http://www.argyllcms.com/
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889625
Bug ID: 1889625
Summary: Review Request: python-respx - Utility for mocking out
the HTTPX and HTTP Core libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889619
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1269538 (IoT)
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889611
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1889619
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889619
Bug ID: 1889619
Summary: Review Request: python-adext - Python module to extend
AlarmDecoder module
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889611
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1269538 (IoT)
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889611
Bug ID: 1889611
Summary: Review Request: python-alarmdecoder - Python interface
for the AlarmDecoder (AD2) devices
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889
Bug 1465889 depends on bug 1880848, which changed state.
Bug 1880848 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-rickb777-date - A Go package
for working with dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880848
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880848
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889606
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1269538 (IoT)
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889606
Bug ID: 1889606
Summary: Review Request: python-pygrocy - Python API client for
grocy
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889362
--- Comment #4 from Tomáš Hrnčiar ---
Updated spec file and SRPM.
Spec:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/thrnciar/python-fastjsonschema/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01713447-python-fastjsonschema/python-fastjsonschema.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889362
--- Comment #3 from Tomáš Hrnčiar ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)
> Curiosity question:
>
> %pytest -m "not benchmark"
>
> This looks copy-pasted-adapted from tox.ini. Since you use
> %pyproject_buildrequires -t, I'd consider
51 matches
Mail list logo
