[Bug 1858998] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools (CDT) plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858998 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov --- Build fails with: ' Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job - nothing provides osgi(org.eclipse.cdt.core.native) needed by eclipse-remote-3.0.1-2.fc31.noarch - nothing provides osgi(org.eclipse.cdt.native.serial) needed by eclipse-remote-3.0.1-2.fc31.noarch - nothing provides osgi(org.eclipse.tm.terminal.control) needed by eclipse-remote-3.0.1-2.fc31.noarch Is there some bootstrapping planned? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858997] Review Request: eclipse-linuxtools - Linux specific Eclipse plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858997 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov --- I'll do this one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856313] Review Request: python-ipywidgets - IPython HTML widgets for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856313 Lumír Balhar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-21 04:34:52 --- Comment #8 from Lumír Balhar --- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-911995aab6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858286] Review Request: marshalparser - Parser for Python internal Marshal format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858286 Lumír Balhar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-21 04:34:23 --- Comment #6 from Lumír Balhar --- https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-003a5464d6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 Cheng-Chia Tseng changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(pswo10680@gmail.c | |om) | Last Closed||2020-07-21 03:21:18 --- Comment #26 from Cheng-Chia Tseng --- The fonts are not actively maintained, there is no new release since my 2015 package. And, I don't have time to maintain the package further. Plus, users can still install the fonts manually themselves. I decide to Close this bug report. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1094015] Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Cheng-Chia Tseng has canceled Package Review 's request for Cheng-Chia Tseng 's needinfo: Bug 1094015: Review Request: cwtex-q-fonts - a series of modern traditional Chinese fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094015 --- Comment #26 from Cheng-Chia Tseng --- The fonts are not actively maintained, there is no new release since my 2015 package. And, I don't have time to maintain the package further. Plus, users can still install the fonts manually themselves. I decide to Close this bug report. Thanks! ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858998] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools (CDT) plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858998 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Fedora Pagure ||releng/issue/9613 --- Comment #1 from Mat Booth --- This a re-review for unretirement of a package, see https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9613 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858997] Review Request: eclipse-linuxtools - Linux specific Eclipse plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858997 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Fedora Pagure ||releng/issue/9612 --- Comment #1 from Mat Booth --- This a re-review for unretirement of a package, see https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9612 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858998] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools (CDT) plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858998 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1858997 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858997 [Bug 1858997] Review Request: eclipse-linuxtools - Linux specific Eclipse plugins -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858997] Review Request: eclipse-linuxtools - Linux specific Eclipse plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858997 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1858998 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858998 [Bug 1858998] Review Request: eclipse-cdt - Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools (CDT) plugin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858998] New: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools (CDT) plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858998 Bug ID: 1858998 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-cdt - Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools (CDT) plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mat.bo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/eclipse-cdt.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/eclipse-cdt-9.11.1-2.fc33.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: mbooth Description: Eclipse features and plugins that are useful for C and C++ development. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858997] New: Review Request: eclipse-linuxtools - Linux specific Eclipse plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858997 Bug ID: 1858997 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-linuxtools - Linux specific Eclipse plugins Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mat.bo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/eclipse-linuxtools.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/eclipse-linuxtools-7.7.0-2.fc33.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: mbooth Description: The Linux Tools project is a two-faceted project. Firstly, it develops tools and frameworks for writing tools for Linux developers. Secondly, it provides a place for Linux distributions to collaboratively overcome issues surrounding distribution packaging of Eclipse technology. The project will produce both best practices and tools related to packaging. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. If you want these mails to stop you need to go to the bug[s] and cancel or ack the needinfo flags. See: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=faq.html#flags point 3 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=faq.html#miscellaneous point 2 needinfo Bug 1855094: Review Request: pveclib - Library for simplified access to PowerISA vector operations (6 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855094 To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue=package-review%40lists.fedoraproject.org=type ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849384] Review Request: swappy - Wayland native snapshot editing tool, inspired by Snappy on macOS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849384 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8a4d68c884 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854357] Review Request: golie - A client/server implementation of ROLIE protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854357 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5a474f0dea has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-5a474f0dea \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5a474f0dea See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858256] Review Request: rpm-git-tag-sort - Sorts git annotated tags according to topology and rpm version sorting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256 --- Comment #5 from cli...@gmail.com --- - These should be autodetected: rpm-git-tag-sort.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgit2 rpm-git-tag-sort.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency rpm-libs You mean I shouldn't put them into spec file as build requires? I think it is not bad to be a little bit more explicit than necessary though... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858256] Review Request: rpm-git-tag-sort - Sorts git annotated tags according to topology and rpm version sorting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- These should be autodetected:
rpm-git-tag-sort.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgit2
rpm-git-tag-sort.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency rpm-libs
Package is approved, please fix the aforementioned issue before import.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
Note: Sources not installed
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License",
"BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License". 144 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/rpm-git-tag-sort/review-rpm-git-tag-
sort/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]:
[Bug 1858971] Review Request: nicotine+ - A graphical client for Soulseek
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858971 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1856531 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856531 [Bug 1856531] nicotine+ 2.0.1 python3 port is now available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858971] New: Review Request: nicotine+ - A graphical client for Soulseek
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858971 Bug ID: 1858971 Summary: Review Request: nicotine+ - A graphical client for Soulseek Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/nicotine+/nicotine+.spec SRPM URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/nicotine+/nicotine+-2.0.1-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Nicotine+ is a graphical client for the Soulseek peer-to-peer file sharing network. It is an attempt to keep Nicotine working with the latest libraries, kill bugs, keep current with the Soulseek protocol, and add some new features that users want and/or need. Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity Note: this package was retired during F32 development last year (no Python 3 support at this time). The latest releases of Nicotine+ now supports Python 3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1857785] Review Request: libgnt - GLib Ncurses Toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857785
Xose Vazquez Perez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xose.vazq...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Xose Vazquez Perez ---
(In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #3)
> And I were incorrect, there are much nicer url to get sources from already.
> You can find them under upper right corner of page [1].
>
> Source0:
> https://dl.bintray.com/pidgin/releases/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
> Source1:
> https://dl.bintray.com/pidgin/releases/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz.asc
>
> 1. https://bintray.com/pidgin/releases/libgnt/2.14.0#files
Also at: https://sf.net/projects/pidgin/files/libgnt/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858858] Wsdd package has incorrect firewalld settings, needs a sysconfig option for systemd file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858858 Sam P changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RELEASE_PENDING -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858858] Wsdd package has incorrect firewalld settings, needs a sysconfig option for systemd file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858858 Sam P changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.6.1-2 --- Comment #1 from Sam P --- I appreciate the proposed fixes Stew. I've gone ahead and incorporated them tagging as a new release of the latest wsdd package as seen here for f32: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c79dd031db These have been submitted to testing, any feedback or concerns would be appreciated. Thanks. Sam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858256] Review Request: rpm-git-tag-sort - Sorts git annotated tags according to topology and rpm version sorting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256 --- Comment #3 from cli...@gmail.com --- I made most of changes according to the review. spec file: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/clime/rpm-git-tag-sort/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01565909-rpm-git-tag-sort/rpm-git-tag-sort.spec srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/clime/rpm-git-tag-sort/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01565909-rpm-git-tag-sort/rpm-git-tag-sort-0.1-1.fc33.src.rpm copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/clime/rpm-git-tag-sort/build/1565909/ I am unsure about the usage of LDFLAGS. When used, I couldn't link the project successfully on my machine due to missing symbols from libgit. I also did not provide %doc as I believe the project is quite minimal and rpm summary and command-line help is sufficient. Please take a look if you can. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858721] Review Request: rust-cpuid-bool - Lightweight no-std compatible alternative to is_x86_feature_detected
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858721 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED CC||jist...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-20 21:13:51 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809644] Review Request: preproc - very simple preprocessing language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809644 cli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-07-20 20:13:54 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1810902] Review Request: rpkg-macros - Set of preproc macros for rpm packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810902 cli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-07-20 20:13:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1811432] Review Request: preproc-rpmspec - Minimalistic tool for rpm spec-file preprocessing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811432 cli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-07-20 20:13:15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858419] Review Request: libavif - Library for encoding and decoding .avif filesLibrary for encoding and decoding .avif files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858419 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andymenderu...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|andymenderu...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1111691] Review Request: qore - multithreaded programming/scripting language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691 --- Comment #39 from Andy Mender --- I see this has been hanging around for a while so I'll take it. David, if you still need a sponsor, be sure to block the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug report. I'll wait a bit for a new SPEC and SRPM so take your time :). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1111691] Review Request: qore - multithreaded programming/scripting language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andymenderu...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|andymenderu...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1857785] Review Request: libgnt - GLib Ncurses Toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857785 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-07-20 17:38:46 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858858] Wsdd package has incorrect firewalld settings, needs a sysconfig option for systemd file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858858 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dagofthed...@gmail.com, ||zebo...@gmail.com Component|Package Review |wsdd Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dagofthed...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856556] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java library to manage Subversion working copies and repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856556 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-20 17:07:58 --- Comment #3 from Mat Booth --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > > Package approved, please fix the aforementioned issue before import. > Of course, see commit https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/svnkit/c/76821d3d905a0587d955e168e08ceafb6fb75f84 Thanks for the review, rawhide build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1544232 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1835367] Review Request: python-chm - Python package for CHM files handling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835367 Luis Bazan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(bazanluis20@gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #10 from Luis Bazan --- Working on it! Cheers, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1857316] Review Request: rust-gptman - GPT manager that allows you to copy partitions from one disk to another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857316 Benjamin Gilbert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-20 16:40:14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856556] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java library to manage Subversion working copies and repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856556 Bug 1856556 depends on bug 1856553, which changed state. Bug 1856553 Summary: Review Request: jsch-agent-proxy - Proxy to ssh-agent and Pageant in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856553 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856553] Review Request: jsch-agent-proxy - Proxy to ssh-agent and Pageant in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856553 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-20 16:34:24 --- Comment #3 from Mat Booth --- Thanks for the review, rawhide build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1544205 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856557] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856557 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-20 15:31:32 --- Comment #9 from Mat Booth --- Thanks for the review, rawhide build is here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1544193 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856556] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java library to manage Subversion working copies and repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856556 Bug 1856556 depends on bug 1856557, which changed state. Bug 1856557 Summary: Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856557 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856553] Review Request: jsch-agent-proxy - Proxy to ssh-agent and Pageant in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856553 Bug 1856553 depends on bug 1856557, which changed state. Bug 1856557 Summary: Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856557 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858376] Review Request: python-extension-helpers - A build time package to simplify C/Cython extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858376 Christian Dersch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-20 15:29:14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858858] New: Wsdd package has incorrect firewalld settings, needs a sysconfig option for systemd file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858858 Bug ID: 1858858 Summary: Wsdd package has incorrect firewalld settings, needs a sysconfig option for systemd file Product: Fedora Version: 32 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: stewart_whit...@hotmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1701776 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1701776=edit Source RPM package. Description of problem: 1. The wsdd package that is currently available to Fedora 32 users comes with incorrect firewalld settings. The service xml files do not allow multicast messages through when added. 2. Also, in the systemd service file, a user needs to pass options to the daemon - for example, the user probably needs to specify the Samba workgroup name. In short it needs a sysconfig option. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.5-2 Additional info: I've attach a src.rpm for wsdd 0.6.1 that contains fixes for both these issues: 1. Firewalld: Two firewalld service files: wsdd.xml that opens the multicast port. wsdd-http.xml included as a service in wsdd.xml that opens the well-know TCP port (don't know if you can merge this into a single file) 2. Options/Systemd Add /etc/sysconfig/wsdd, and pass settings to systemd file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858721] Review Request: rust-cpuid-bool - Lightweight no-std compatible alternative to is_x86_feature_detected
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858721 --- Comment #2 from Igor Raits --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-cpuid-bool -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849568] Review Request: sourcetrail - a free and open-source interactive source explorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849568 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sourcetrail -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1857316] Review Request: rust-gptman - GPT manager that allows you to copy partitions from one disk to another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857316 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-gptman -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1439893] Review Request: luadec - Lua Decompiler for lua 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 (built for 5.1)
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Conrad Meyer has canceled Package Review 's request for Conrad Meyer 's needinfo: Bug 1439893: Review Request: luadec - Lua Decompiler for lua 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 (built for 5.1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439893 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858286] Review Request: marshalparser - Parser for Python internal Marshal format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858286 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/marshalparser -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858531] Review Request: partio - Library for reading/writing/manipulating common animation particle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858531 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/partio -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856313] Review Request: python-ipywidgets - IPython HTML widgets for Jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856313 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-ipywidgets -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858503] Review Request: python-sphinx_ansible_theme - A reusable Ansible Sphinx Theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858503 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinx_ansible_theme -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858376] Review Request: python-extension-helpers - A build time package to simplify C/Cython extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858376 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-extension-helpers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858449] Review Request: perl-MooX-TypeTiny - Optimized type checks for Moo + Type::Tiny
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858449
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
URL and Source addresses are Ok.
TODO: Remove a trailing slash from the URL value.
Source0 archive (SHA-256:
d81e26ff6f8db10261f0087f96dc54367dcb49a9f3de8d53238f834ece19624b) is original.
Ok.
Summary verified from lib/MooX/TypeTiny.pm. Ok.
Description verified from lib/MooX/TypeTiny.pm. Ok.
License verified from Makefile.PL, lib/MooX/TypeTiny.pm, LICENSE, and README.
Ok.
No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok.
FIX: Build-require "perl-interpreter" (perl-MooX-TypeTiny.spec:30).
FIX: Build-require "make" (perl-MooX-TypeTiny.spec:31).
FIX: Build-require "coreutils" (perl-MooX-TypeTiny.spec:39).
TODO: Use %{make_build} and %{make_install} instead of "make %{?_smp_mflags}"
and "make pure_install".
TODO: Remove "find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null
\;". It's not needed.
FIX: Build-require "perl(strict)" (Makefile.PL:1).
FIX: Build-require "perl(warnings)" (Makefile.PL:2).
TODO: Build-require "perl(:VERSION) >= 5.6" (Makefile.PL:3).
Moo::_Utils is a private module. Ok.
FIX: Build-require "perl(Moo::Role)"
(lib/MooX/TypeTiny/Role/GenerateAccessor.pm:2).
FIX: Build-require "perl(Scalar::Util)"
(lib/MooX/TypeTiny/Role/GenerateAccessor.pm:4).
FIX: Build-require "perl(Sub::Quote)"
(lib/MooX/TypeTiny/Role/GenerateAccessor.pm:3).
FIX: Build-require "perl(Types::Standard)" (t/basic.t:7).
All tests pass. Ok.
$ rpmlint perl-MooX-TypeTiny.spec
../SRPMS/perl-MooX-TypeTiny-0.002003-1.fc33.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-MooX-TypeTiny-0.002003-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
sh: /usr/bin/python2: No such file or directory
perl-MooX-TypeTiny.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US isa -> is,
visa, Lisa
perl-MooX-TypeTiny.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US coercions ->
coercion, coercion's, coercion s
perl-MooX-TypeTiny.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US isa -> is,
visa, Lisa
perl-MooX-TypeTiny.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US coercions ->
coercion, coercion's, coercion s
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
rpmlint is Ok.
$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-MooX-TypeTiny-0.002003-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul 20 15:36
/usr/share/doc/perl-MooX-TypeTiny
-rw-r--r--1 root root 970 Apr 29 16:35
/usr/share/doc/perl-MooX-TypeTiny/Changes
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1186 Apr 29 16:35
/usr/share/doc/perl-MooX-TypeTiny/README
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul 20 15:36
/usr/share/licenses/perl-MooX-TypeTiny
-rw-r--r--1 root root18235 Apr 29 16:35
/usr/share/licenses/perl-MooX-TypeTiny/LICENSE
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1711 Jul 20 15:36
/usr/share/man/man3/MooX::TypeTiny.3pm.gz
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul 20 15:36
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/MooX
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul 20 15:36
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/MooX/TypeTiny
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1856 Apr 29 16:35
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/MooX/TypeTiny.pm
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul 20 15:36
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/MooX/TypeTiny/Role
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2029 Apr 26 06:40
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/MooX/TypeTiny/Role/GenerateAccessor.pm
File layout and permissions are Ok.
$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-MooX-TypeTiny-0.002003-1.fc33.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq
-c
1 perl(Moo::Role)
1 perl(Scalar::Util)
1 perl(strict)
1 perl(Sub::Quote)
1 perl(warnings)
1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1
FIX: Run-require "perl(:MODULE_COMPAT...)".
FIX: Run-require "perl(Moo) >= 2.004)" (lib/MooX/TypeTiny.pm:11).
$ rpm -q --provides -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-MooX-TypeTiny-0.002003-1.fc33.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq
-c
1 perl(MooX::TypeTiny) = 0.002003
1 perl(MooX::TypeTiny::Role::GenerateAccessor)
1 perl-MooX-TypeTiny = 0.002003-1.fc33
Binary provides are Ok.
$ resolvedeps rawhide
../RPMS/noarch/perl-MooX-TypeTiny-0.002003-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
Binary dependencies are resolvable. Ok.
The package builds in Fedora 33
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47496724). Ok.
Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl pacackaging guidelines.
Please correct the "FIX" items, consider fixing "TODO" items, and provide a new
spec file.
Resolution: Package NOT approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858487] Review Request: rust-keccak - Keccak-f sponge function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858487 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-keccak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1856589] Review Request: openshadinglanguage - Advanced shading language for production GI renderers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856589 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openshadinglanguage -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858449] Review Request: perl-MooX-TypeTiny - Optimized type checks for Moo + Type::Tiny
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858449 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858360] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack - HTTP Action, Adventure and Excitement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858360
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
URL and Source0 addresses are Ok.
TODO: Remove a trailing slash from the URL value.
Source0 archive (SHA-256:
c78111ab857e48c69824903d4b6ce8293feffc6b5d670db550a767f853acc7da) is original.
Ok.
Summary verified from lib/HTTP/Headers/ActionPack.pm. OK.
TODO: The summary is not much descriptive. Have you consider not following the
upstream here? Something like "Parsing and constructing HTTP headers" would be
more helpful.
Description verified from lib/HTTP/Headers/ActionPack.pm. Ok.
License verified from Makefile.PL, LICENSE, README,
lib/HTTP/Headers/ActionPack.pm, and others. OK.
No XS code, noArch BuildArch is Ok.
FIX: Build-require "perl-interpreter" (perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack.spec:44).
TODO: Use %{make_build} and %{make_install} instead of "make %{?_smp_mflags}"
and "make pure_install".
TODO: Remove "find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null
\;". It's not needed.
FIX: Build-require "make" (perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack.spec:58).
FIX: Build-require "coreutils" (perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack.spec:66).
TODO: Packaging both README and REAMDE.md seens redundant. Consider dropping
README.
TODO: Constrain "perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)" with ">= 6.30" (Makefile.PL:7).
HTTP::Message::PSGI is optional and build-required. Ok.
Web::Request is optional and not build-required. Ok.
TODO: Plack::Request and Plack::Response are used by tests only. Please
categorize them as "Testsuite only". Not as "Optional runtime".
Test::Spelling, Test::NoTabs, Test::Pod::LinkCheck, Test::Pod::No404s, and
Test::Pod are not used. Ok.
TODO: Consider unsetting AUTHOR_TESTING and RELEASE_TESTING environment
variable in %check section to make sure the modules are not used.
All tests pass. Ok.
$ rpmlint perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack.spec
../SRPMS/perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack-0.09-1.fc33.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack-0.09-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
sh: /usr/bin/python2: No such file or directory
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint is Ok.
$ rpm -q -lv -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack-0.09-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2120 Jun 18 2013
/usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack/Changes
-rw-r--r--1 root root 327 Jun 18 2013
/usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack/README
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1513 Jun 18 2013
/usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack/README.md
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/licenses/perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack
-rw-r--r--1 root root18389 Jun 18 2013
/usr/share/licenses/perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack/LICENSE
-rw-r--r--1 root root 3652 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2060 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::AcceptCharset.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1889 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::AcceptLanguage.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1866 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::AuthenticationInfo.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2137 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::Authorization.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1996 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::Authorization::Basic.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2076 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::Authorization::Digest.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2421 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::ContentNegotiation.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1638 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::Core::Base.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1673 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::Core::BaseAuthHeader.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1739 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::Core::BaseHeaderList.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1848 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::Core::BaseHeaderType.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1805 Jul 20 15:03
/usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ActionPack::Core::BaseHeaderWithParams.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2210 Jul 20 15:03
[Bug 1858360] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack - HTTP Action, Adventure and Excitement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858360 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858781] New: Review Request: maven-mapping - Apache Maven Mapping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858781 Bug ID: 1858781 Summary: Review Request: maven-mapping - Apache Maven Mapping Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven-mapping.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven-mapping-3.0.0-10.fc33.src.rpm Description: Maven shared component that implements file name mapping. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe Note: This is a package review for a package unretirement (again). We need it to update aqute-bnd to >= 4.0.0. The .spec file went through re-review already a few months ago, so it should be fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #151 from Renu Sharma --- Gurgaon Russian Escorts have been presenting exotic companionship then the proper physical companionship then you can see the proper impact of independent Gurgaon Russian Escorts http://www.callgirlsinaerocity.net/russian-call-girls-gurgaon.html http://www.callgirlsinaerocity.net/call-girls-mahipalpur.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 Renu Sharma changed: What|Removed |Added CC||renusharmaa...@gmail.com --- Comment #150 from Renu Sharma --- http://www.callgirlsinaerocity.net/call-girls-in-mg-road-gurgaon.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1149524] Review Request: perl-Digest-Whirlpool - Interface to Whirlpool hash algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149524 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar --- Denis, prepare the patch, apply it from the spec file and link the updated spec and SRPM here. Then I (or anybody else) can review it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858770] New: Re-Review Request: rust-copydeps - find and copy a program's dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858770 Bug ID: 1858770 Summary: Re-Review Request: rust-copydeps - find and copy a program's dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@svgames.pl QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/rust-copydeps-5.0.0-1/rust-copydeps.spec srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/rust-copydeps-5.0.0-1/rust-copydeps-5.0.0-1.fc32.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47487240 Description: copydeps is a program that can be used to find and copy all .so / .dll files needed by an executable to run. This can be useful when you want to bundle an application together with all its dependencies. Fedora Account System Username: suve - copydeps v4.0 is already packaged for Fedora (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/copydeps). However, for v5.0, upstream decided to switch from Python to Rust, which means: 1) re-writing the whole spec 2) changing the git-scm repository name to rust-copydeps Hence this re-review request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858721] Review Request: rust-cpuid-bool - Lightweight no-std compatible alternative to is_x86_feature_detected
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858721 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably. - Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec) - license correct and valid - only sources installed PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1849722] Review Request: python-graphene - GraphQL Framework for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849722 Javier Peña changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-07-20 10:53:16 --- Comment #4 from Javier Peña --- We have a Rawhide build now, closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #149 from kavita973 --- How do you want to have the ability to Repeat this in a remarkably simplistic manner, I am sure you may have good understanding of marketplace and people in summary. https://www.kirtimodi.in https://www.renzy.in https://www.udaipurescortservice.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #148 from kavita973 --- I applause to you which you're the best writer in the analytics guy that was greatest along with this universe I've experienced. https://www.simranroy.co.in/jaipur-escorts-services.html https://www.simranroy.co.in/agra-escorts-services.html https://www.simranroy.co.in/patna-escorts-services.html https://www.simranroy.co.in/faridabad-escorts-services.html https://www.simranroy.co.in/surat-escorts-services.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #147 from kavita973 --- Really your creative writing skills has Encouraged me to get my own web site today. Really the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly https://www.jaipurnights.com https://www.alishaoberoi.com/jodhpur-escort-service.html http://www.celebrity-prostitute.com http://www.callgirlsgoa.com https://www.elizarova.in -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 kavita973 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||renzymehthaesservice@gmail. ||com --- Comment #146 from kavita973 --- I want you to thank you for your time of the Wonderful read. I definately enjoy every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to test out new stuff of your site a must read website https://www.jianainitalescorts.com/ https://www.jianainitalescorts.com/haldwani-escorts-services.html https://www.jianainitalescorts.com/ramnagar-escorts-services.html https://www.jianainitalescorts.com/rudrapur-escorts-services.html https://www.jianainitalescorts.com/dehradun-escorts-services.html https://www.jianainitalescorts.com/haridwar-escorts-services.html https://www.jianainitalescorts.com/rishikesh-escorts-services.html https://www.jianainitalescorts.com/mussoorie-escorts-services.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699561] Review Request: reicast - Sega Dreamcast emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699561 davidgf changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(da...@davidgf.net |needinfo? |) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1854357] Review Request: golie - A client/server implementation of ROLIE protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854357 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5a474f0dea has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5a474f0dea -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858256] Review Request: rpm-git-tag-sort - Sorts git annotated tags according to topology and rpm version sorting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858256 --- Comment #2 from cli...@gmail.com --- Robert, thank you very much. I will address the issues today. I would argue that 0.0.git.2.498f832d.dirty.0nub0m is sortable but I will replace it by 0.1 if you agree (I am actually upstream too for this package). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858721] New: Review Request: rust-cpuid-bool - Lightweight no-std compatible alternative to is_x86_feature_detected
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858721 Bug ID: 1858721 Summary: Review Request: rust-cpuid-bool - Lightweight no-std compatible alternative to is_x86_feature_detected Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: igor.ra...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-cpuid-bool.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-cpuid-bool-0.1.1-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: Lightweight no-std compatible alternative to is_x86_feature_detected. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1858286] Review Request: marshalparser - Parser for Python internal Marshal format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858286
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mhron...@redhat.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Package APPROVED.
Notes:
1) Consider adding %py_provides python3-%{name}.
2) Various test files are probably licensed as "Python", but the built
package does not ship them. Consider adding a comment.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Various test files are probably licensed as "Python", but the built
package does not ship them. Consider adding a comment.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if
[Bug 1853217] Review Request: ServiceReport - a tool to validate and repair system configuration for specific purposes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853217 --- Comment #10 from Vasant Hegde --- Sourabh is not in packager group. I will maintain this package for Fedora until he gets into packager group. Looks like I need to open new bugzilla with my ID .. so that I can request to create new repo for fedora. -Vasant -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1853217] Review Request: ServiceReport - a tool to validate and repair system configuration for specific purposes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853217 --- Comment #9 from Vasant Hegde --- Response to repo creation request: > repo creation request : > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/26877 The Bugzilla review bug creator didn't match the requester in Pagure. -Vasant -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
