https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895567
Bug 1895567 depends on bug 1890891, which changed state.
Bug 1890891 Summary: Review Request: ptex - Per-Face Texture Mapping for
Production Rendering
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890891
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890891
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895568
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895722
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-5b68d32b39 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5b68d32b39
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895722
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-27d8d1b5c0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-27d8d1b5c0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895722
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895833
--- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani ---
The license still needs clarifying [1]. Licensecheck reports as below (for
files without unknown license). The license rather appears to be GPLv2+ and MIT
(aka Expat).
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #7 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Sorry for this not really usefull message, but I updated the main repo with
2.2.0 final.
SPEC URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/awf-extended/blob/v2.2.0/fedora-gtk3/awf-gtk3.spec
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893321
--- Comment #7 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Sorry for this not really usefull message, but I updated the main repo with
2.2.0 final.
SPEC URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/awf-extended/blob/v2.2.0/fedora-gtk2/awf-gtk2.spec
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896590
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893327
--- Comment #5 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Sorry for this not really usefull message, but I updated the main repo with
1.1.0 final.
SPEC URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/human-theme/blob/master/fedora/human-theme-gtk.spec
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896590
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742
Bug ID: 1896742
Summary: Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the
RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756
--- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen ---
Spec URL:
http://straylen.web.cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-managesieve/python-managesieve.spec
SRPM URL:
http://straylen.web.cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-managesieve/python-managesieve-0.6-2.fc32.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896590
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcava...@fb.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895766
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ansible-pcp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895722
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1896855
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895696
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896852
Bug ID: 1896852
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-facebook-ent - An entity
framework for Go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894605
--- Comment #4 from John Kacur ---
I followed all of the review suggestions
- removed unnecessary parts of the spec file
- one BuildRequires per line
- modified make line to use _prefix macro
- used the _bindir and _mandir prefixes through
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895722
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner ---
While looking at Anitya and PyPi with an already exist project named
snipeitpyapi but propably without a maintained package, to implement some
upstream monitoring I've found a more recent fork.
There's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895696
--- Comment #5 from Andy Mender ---
> The fixed spec file:
> https://github.com/ycollet/fedora-spec/blob/master/libsmf/libsmf.spec
When pointing to the SPEC file, try to point directly to the raw file itself
like so:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756
Ben Cotton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bcot...@redhat.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896590
--- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #4)
> - related, I think we may want BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON and to ship the shared
> libs in their own watchman-libs package, otherwise all bindings will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885430
--- Comment #15 from giovanni.cabi...@intel.com ---
Thanks Carl.
Two things:
- We just released 20.10 which includes the removal of bundled
OpenSSL/libcrypto and changes to the install target in the Makefile that allow
to improve spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885430
--- Comment #16 from Carl George 鸞 ---
Awesome, thanks for doing the work to get that debundled and add the makefile
target. Importing the latest version of the spec file into dist-git is fine.
However, in the latest version of the spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885421
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894605
--- Comment #5 from John Kacur ---
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=55399273
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891961
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896590
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #5)
> (In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #4)
> > - related, I think we may want BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON and to ship the shared
> > libs in their own
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896590
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Spec URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/utils/watchman.spec
SRPM URL:
https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/utils/watchman-2020.09.21.00-2.fc33.src.rpm
- Support enabling tests
- Add
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895795
Peter Hutterer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: setxkbmap - |Review Request: setxkbmap -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896590
--- Comment #8 from Neal Gompa ---
I'd like to see this build fixed so that the shared libraries are built.
Obviously library code exists for the Python bindings to compile with, and as
Watchman has quite a few more, it makes sense to expose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892756
--- Comment #5 from Germano Massullo ---
I am experiencing some technical difficulties not related to this review.
Meanwhile can you apply theid edit to the spec file? Thank you
--- python-managesieve.spec 2020-11-11 16:06:38.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895766
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-bfca03f800 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bfca03f800
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895766
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d8221e7150 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d8221e7150
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896988
Bug ID: 1896988
Summary: Review Request: fbzmq - Framework for writing services
in C++ while leveraging libzmq
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895548
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-504e73e998 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-504e73e998
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885430
--- Comment #17 from Carl George 鸞 ---
I tried a build reverting that myself, and something else looks off.
Previously the build was creating the library files with this suffix:
.so.%{soversion}.%{version}
Now using the Makefile target
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896988
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
> -DPACKAGE_VERSION={version} \
> -DSO_VERSION={version}
I think you mean "%{version}" here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892172
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-9063ffee55 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895548
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895549
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895549
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-504e73e998 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-504e73e998
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895722
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895722
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-5b68d32b39 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892172
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d767b8ea48 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1892172
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-3ffbc9aa97 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895722
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-27d8d1b5c0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895833
--- Comment #6 from Jan Grulich ---
You are right, the license shouldn't be LGPLv2+. I copied the license from the
original adwaita-qt package.
Fixed package:
Spec URL:
https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/mingw-adwaita-qt/mingw-adwaita-qt.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896175
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896174
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgrul...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-11afeac81d has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885430
--- Comment #18 from Carl George 鸞 ---
> - When creating a ticket for tracking ExcludeArch, there isn't a component
> yet for qatlib. Is this created when the repo gets created or there is
> something I should do?
Correct, it doesn't get
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885495
--- Comment #14 from Carl George 鸞 ---
The review tool only works with an overall successful copr build. Go ahead and
disable the targets that failed so we can get a clean build. I suggest waiting
for the final SRPM out of bug 1885430
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896988
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763894
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ca3b0196e1 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884608
--- Comment #9 from Patryk Obara ---
I decided to explicitly mark SDL BuildRequires as >= 2.0.2. Also, added a
comment to justify -O3 usage to comply with packaging guidelines:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896174
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896175
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896174
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jan
61 matches
Mail list logo
