https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691
--- Comment #19 from David Nichols da...@qore.org ---
(In reply to David Nichols from comment #18)
OK I have it like this now:
Provides: qore-module(abi) = 0.19
Provides: qore-module(abi) = 0.18
Provides: libqore5 = %{version}
Obsoletes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Mihkel Vain tura...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061801
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Put the latest version SRPM here and I will take a look again. ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com ---
Updated. Links are the same.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108810
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
--- Comment #24 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net ---
Two more nitpicks:
The -doc subpackage doesn't depend on the main package, so it could be
installed without it and the LICENSE file would not be present then.
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062542
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Benedikt Morbach bmorb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112246
Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(phra...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108810
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112010
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pysubnettree-0.23-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pysubnettree-0.23-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112010
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
--- Comment #25 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Documentation packages that pull in dependencies (just for a license file) are
inconvenient. Please duplicate the license file instead of adding dependencies
on base packages and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108811
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062542
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dominik@greysecto |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067665
Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108812
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094289
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Term-Encoding-0.02-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Term-Encoding-0.02-2.el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
--- Comment #26 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Uhm, the -doc is not requiring the main package, and does ship a copy of the
license file.
As for the pkgdocdir, /usr/share/doc/tetgen-doc would need to exist anyways for
LICENSE, so I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108812
--- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com ---
Looks good, no issue spotted, approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108817
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691
--- Comment #20 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
libqore.x86_64: E: useless-provides qore-module(abi)
rpmlint is mistaken in this case. A bug report had been filed years ago in bug
460872, but it has been closed due to a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108817
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108811
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108812
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089213
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052852
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052852
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052852
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052852
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.el6
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181
Benedikt Morbach bmorb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108827
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691
--- Comment #21 from David Nichols da...@qore.org ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #20)
libqore.x86_64: E: useless-provides qore-module(abi)
rpmlint is mistaken in this case. A bug report had been filed years ago in
bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108827
--- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com ---
Everything looks good, approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108827
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089213
--- Comment #11 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com ---
It installs and the API endpoint works under rawhide.
It builds under all Fedora:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7070451
Forget my previous comment on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112246
--- Comment #14 from Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com ---
New SPEC with corrected Summary.
DistGit tag has been added too.
SPEC Url: http://phracek.fedorapeople.org/rebase-helper/rebase-helper.spec
SRPM Url:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112246
--- Comment #15 from Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Petr Hracek from comment #14)
New SPEC with corrected Summary.
DistGit tag has been added too.
SPEC Url: http://phracek.fedorapeople.org/rebase-helper/rebase-helper.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=946856
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1095967
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=946856
--- Comment #39 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Then, in addition to installing libspectrwm.so.0.0.0, you'll want to create
symlinks to libspectrwm.so.0 and libspectrwm.so. The unversioned .so file
should go in a -devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089213
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo+ |
--- Comment #12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691
--- Comment #22 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Are these obsoletes lines needed? These are not available in the official repo
but only in the qore 3rd party yum repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089213
--- Comment #13 from Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com ---
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/openstack-trove.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/openstack-trove-2014.1-5.fc20.src.rpm
Description: OpenStack DBaaS (codename
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097384
Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003188
--- Comment #31 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com ---
Latest tycho in F20 is aware of eclipse-license, please verify and drop the
lines dealing with it from the spec.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691
--- Comment #23 from David Nichols da...@qore.org ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #22)
Are these obsoletes lines needed? These are not available in the official
repo but only in the qore 3rd party yum repo.
There is only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089213
--- Comment #14 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com ---
Minimizing dependencies is a must in Fedora guidelines, but in openstack case,
I agree it will be difficult to track dependencies, at least without looking at
the global picture.
For
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||psab...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089213
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097384
--- Comment #1 from Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com ---
The package has wrong license (GPLv2 stated, LGPLv2 actual) and no LICENSE or
COPYING file. Otherwise looks good, full report below.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108828
Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
URL and Source0 are usable. Ok.
Source archive is original (SHA-256:
bf147b7268a46bef07b4046c3f67504a7be482bbf25ccd2abec8abcf2d95375a). Ok.
Summary is Ok.
Description is Ok.
License verified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541
--- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602
--- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #4)
PACKAGE APPROVED.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602
Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062542
--- Comment #17 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
No sweat, I understand your logic now:
Here is my new %files section:
%doc COPYING
%{_libdir}/libdatrie.so.*
%exclude %{_pkgdocdir}/*.css
%exclude %{_pkgdocdir}/*.html
%exclude
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062542
--- Comment #18 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #17)
No sweat, I understand your logic now:
Here is my new %files section:
%doc COPYING
%{_libdir}/libdatrie.so.*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=388
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|483663 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721112
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugzilla.redhat.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721112
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112246
--- Comment #16 from Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com ---
Yeah, good catch.
SPEC Url: http://phracek.fedorapeople.org/rebase-helper/rebase-helper.spec
SRPM Url:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112649
Bug ID: 1112649
Summary: Review Request: jpnevulator - Serial line sniffer
including very simple terminal emulator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
--- Comment #29 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
(Copy-paste mistake fix...)
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: tetgen
Short Description: A tetrahedral mesh generator
Owners: smani
Branches: f20 el6 epel7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112649
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108810
Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108810
--- Comment #2 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request\n===\nPackage Name:
kf5-kiconthemes\nShort Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 integration module
with icon themes\nUpstream URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108810
--- Comment #3 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: kf5-kiconthemes
Short Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 integration module with icon themes
Upstream URL: http://www.kde.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108811
Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108811
--- Comment #2 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: kf5-kservice
Short Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for advanced plugin and
service introspection
Upstream URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067665
--- Comment #19 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com ---
so xtrace from xtrace should be renamed to x11xtrace as noted at
http://xtrace.alioth.debian.org/ at the bottom.
Actually, it suggests x11trace. What do we do about this? I assume
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108812
--- Comment #2 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: kf5-knotifications
Short Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution with abstraction for system
notifications
Upstream URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108812
Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108817
--- Comment #2 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: kf5-textwidgets
Short Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon with advanced text editing
widgets
Upstream URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108817
Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824
--- Comment #2 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: kf5-kxmlgui
Short Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 solution for user-configurable main
windows
Upstream URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108824
Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108827
--- Comment #2 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: kf5-kbookmarks
Short Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for bookmarks manipulation
Upstream URL: http://www.kde.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108827
Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112649
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089213
Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(p...@draigbrady.com) |
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541
--- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
Also please next time upload the sources to place wherefrom they could be
simple wget-ed, e.g. fedorapeople.org. or anywhere, in such case it could be
automatically processed by the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663
--- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546445
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546445
--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
WARNING: Requested package name firefox-esteidpkcs11loader doesn't match bug
summary esteidpkcs11loader
Please correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108810
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108810
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076456
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|val...@civ.zcu.cz
1 - 100 of 296 matches
Mail list logo
