[Bug 1396790] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-freon - GNOME Shell extension to display system temperature , voltage, and fan speed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396790 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System--- gnome-shell-extension-freon-23-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-021e8661c5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1396790] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-freon - GNOME Shell extension to display system temperature , voltage, and fan speed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396790 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System--- gnome-shell-extension-freon-23-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2486ed920e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1424890] Review Request: domterm - terminal emulator based on web technologies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424890 --- Comment #9 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek--- Created attachment 1267224 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1267224=edit qtdomterm menu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1424890] Review Request: domterm - terminal emulator based on web technologies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424890 --- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek--- Created attachment 1267223 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1267223=edit qtdomterm screenshot I have a HiDPI screen: XWAYLAND0 connected 2560x1440+0+0 310mm x 170mm 2560x1440 59.96*+ and the default fonts in qtdomterm don't work out too well. Also note that unicode characters are not really displayed properly. It doesn't seem to just a case of missing fonts, instead multi-byte utf8 characters are converted to some ascii noise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1424890] Review Request: domterm - terminal emulator based on web technologies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424890 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Depends On||1422477 Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- I added 1422477 as a dep, mostly to have an easy-to-access link to it. It's almost complete anyway. fedora-review says: - Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros My advice is to stick to %buildroot (or %{buildroot}). That's the commonly used modern form. In fact, it'd be best to replace the make invocation with %make_install, which expands to the exact same line. Those long lines with multiple BuildRequires should be split into separate lines. It's not required, but in my opinion is makes it much easier to spot mistakes and diffs look *much* better. domterm.src:10: W: macro-in-comment %{commit0} domterm.src:44: W: macro-in-comment %{_bindir} → The second one should be replaced with %%{_bindir} to avoid the warning. The first one can stay, if you want to have a valid link in rpmspec -P output. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires says that you need Requires: javapackages-tools, Requires: java. (Either directly or indirectly, but I don't see it either way.) Two big things which is missing, and which is strongly recommended by the guidelines are a .desktop file [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files] and an .appdata file [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AppData]. In this case an appdata file will be particularly useful, advertising your software and allowing potential users to see how if differers from the many other terminal emulators. In the %description, please add some meat. Why is this package better, what does it do differently than other terminal emulators, what cool features does it sport. This text shouldn't be long, just one or two paragraphs to pique interest. You can reuse most of the text in the appdata file anyway ;) I built and installed the package, on F25. Seems not to work: - in the terminal: $ ldomterm [9066:9066:0328/230720.355575:ERROR:child_thread_impl.cc(762)] Request for unknown Channel-associated interface: ui::mojom::GpuMain and there's also a big blank window which only says "Waiting for localhost..." in the lower left corner. qtdomterm works OK, but it doesn't seem to support HiDPI very well (see attached screenshot). From what I know, it's a general problem with Qt, so I don't expect you to fix it. Just pointing this out in case you need stuff to improve ;) -- I can sponsor you. My requirements apart from this package will be two or three reviews of other packages. Your package is pretty complex, so you'll soak up a lot of the packaging guidelines just for it, but it's always good to see and critique what other people are doing. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html for a list of interesting candidates. Please set up mock, if you haven't already, and base your reviews on fedora-review output, but note that fedora-review does get stuff wrong occasionally and leaves a lot of boxes to be filled manually. In the reviews make a comment that your review is informal because you are not in the packagers group yet. After you are, you can finish those reviews, if nobody else beats you to it. In case of questions, feel free to query me on IRC (I'm zbyszek in #fedora-devel), or by mail. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422477 [Bug 1422477] libwebsockets-2.2.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1396790] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-freon - GNOME Shell extension to display system temperature , voltage, and fan speed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396790 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System--- gnome-shell-extension-freon-23-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-cb3cb1f22d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1362130] Review Request: olpcau-abc123-fonts - A nice font for kids/ readability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362130 --- Comment #9 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek--- Hi, sorry for the long silence. I went away on vacation and then completely forgot about this. For the future, in such cases, it often helps to send a ping after a week or two, just to get things going again. Let's get this ball rolling again! I looked at your comments on those reviews, but they are a bit scant. Before I asked you for a fedora-review run on #1388945. I'd like to know that you have set up mock and can do test builds there. Can you please do a review of one more package, this time using fedora-review as the starting point? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431426] Review Request: python-dbfread - Read DBF Files with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431426 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Dhanesh, do you plan to take this review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436912] New: Review Request: nodejs-xmlhttprequest-ssl - XMLHttpRequest for Node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436912 Bug ID: 1436912 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-xmlhttprequest-ssl - XMLHttpRequest for Node Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews), 1435930 (c9.io) Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-xmlhttprequest-ssl/nodejs-xmlhttprequest-ssl.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-xmlhttprequest-ssl/nodejs-xmlhttprequest-ssl-1.5.3-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: XMLHttpRequest for Node Fedora Account System Username: jsmith Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435930 [Bug 1435930] Package tracker for Cloud9.io -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1411590] Review Request: ignition-msgs - Common messages for the ignition framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411590 --- Comment #6 from Rich Mattes--- Upstream has confirmed the license and added license headers to the proto files. I've updated the spec to add the --as-needed CXXFLAGS to fix the unused lib deps. Updated package at: Spec URL: https://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ignition-msgs/ignition-msgs.spec SRPM URL: https://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ignition-msgs/ignition-msgs-0.7.0-3.fc25.src.rpm scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18652747 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1430974] Review Request: rhash - Great utility for computing hash sums
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430974 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System--- rhash-1.3.4-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434030] Review Request: openblas-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building source packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434030 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System--- openblas-srpm-macros-1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382755] Review Request: legion - A data-centric parallel programming system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2017-03-28 21:30:57 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System --- legion-17.02.0-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436907] New: Review Request: nodejs-has-cors - Detects support for Cross-Origin Resource Sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436907 Bug ID: 1436907 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-has-cors - Detects support for Cross-Origin Resource Sharing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews), 1435930 (c9.io) Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-has-cors/nodejs-has-cors.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-has-cors/nodejs-has-cors-1.1.0-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: Detects support for Cross-Origin Resource Sharing Fedora Account System Username: jsmith Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435930 [Bug 1435930] Package tracker for Cloud9.io -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1430974] Review Request: rhash - Great utility for computing hash sums
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430974 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2017-03-28 19:53:06 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- rhash-1.3.4-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434030] Review Request: openblas-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building source packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434030 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2017-03-28 19:53:03 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-srpm-macros-1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436881] New: Review Request: nodejs-engine-dot-io-parser - Parser for the client for the realtime Engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436881 Bug ID: 1436881 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-engine-dot-io-parser - Parser for the client for the realtime Engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Depends On: 1435929, 1435932, 1435933, 1435935, 1436880 Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews), 1435930 (c9.io) Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-engine-dot-io-parser/nodejs-engine-dot-io-parser.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-engine-dot-io-parser/nodejs-engine-dot-io-parser-2.0.2-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: Parser for the client for the realtime Engine Fedora Account System Username: jsmith Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435929 [Bug 1435929] Review Request: nodejs-utf8 - A well-tested UTF-8 encoder/decoder written in JavaScript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435930 [Bug 1435930] Package tracker for Cloud9.io https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435932 [Bug 1435932] Review Request: nodejs-blob - Abstracts out Blob and uses BlobBulder in cases where it is supported https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435933 [Bug 1435933] Review Request: nodejs-base64-arraybuffer - Encode/decode base64 data into ArrayBuffers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435935 [Bug 1435935] Review Request: nodejs-arraybuffer-dot-slice - Exports a function for slicing ArrayBuffers (no polyfilling) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436880 [Bug 1436880] Review Request: nodejs-has-binary - Returns true if its argument contains binary data -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436880] New: Review Request: nodejs-has-binary - Returns true if its argument contains binary data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436880 Bug ID: 1436880 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-has-binary - Returns true if its argument contains binary data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews), 1435930 (c9.io) Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-has-binary/nodejs-has-binary.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-has-binary/nodejs-has-binary-0.1.7-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: Returns true if its argument contains binary data Fedora Account System Username: jsmith Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435930 [Bug 1435930] Package tracker for Cloud9.io -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1395955] Review Request: fatresize - FAT16/FAT32 resizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395955 Michal Ambrozchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1395955] Review Request: fatresize - FAT16/FAT32 resizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395955 Michal Ambrozchanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(re...@seznam.cz) |needinfo+ --- Comment #16 from Michal Ambroz --- Hello Richard, package pushed to the testing. Sorry for delays. Mik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1395955] Review Request: fatresize - FAT16/FAT32 resizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395955 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System--- fatresize-1.0.3-4.git20161118.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ff208d4982 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1395955] Review Request: fatresize - FAT16/FAT32 resizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395955 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System--- fatresize-1.0.3-4.git20161118.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-ddc9243067 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1395955] Review Request: fatresize - FAT16/FAT32 resizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395955 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System--- fatresize-1.0.3-4.git20161118.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-82be14e2d8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1395955] Review Request: fatresize - FAT16/FAT32 resizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395955 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1395955] Review Request: fatresize - FAT16/FAT32 resizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395955 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System--- fatresize-1.0.3-4.git20161118.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-078444383c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1028743] Review Request: hans - IP over ICMP tunneling solution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028743 --- Comment #16 from Michal Ambroz--- Hello Pavel, I still see a password in the config, just this time it is literally "" as a password. Or am I missing something? You know - things like Mirai are spreading because of default passwords. Mik. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427341] Review Request: python-gamera - Gamera is a framework for building document analysis applications.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341 --- Comment #20 from VincentS--- Here are new links according to Miro's advises. Spec URL: https://dl.casperlefantom.net/pub/review/python-gamera.spec SRPM URL: https://dl.casperlefantom.net/pub/review/python-gamera-3.4.3-3.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436852] Review Request: pidgin-save-conv-order - Save and restore conversation order in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436852 Daniel Vrátilchanged: What|Removed |Added Alias||pidgin-save-conv-order -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436852] New: Review Request: pidgin-save-conv-order - Save and restore conversation order in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436852 Bug ID: 1436852 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-save-conv-order - Save and restore conversation order in Pidgin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@dvratil.cz QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/spec/pidgin-save-conv-order.spec SRPM URL: https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/spec/pidgin-save-conv-order-1.0-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: This plugin saves the order of chats and IMs and restores it the next time you open a conversation. Fedora Account System Username: dvratil Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18650744 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436347] Review Request: python-pystray - Provides system tray integration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436347 Christian Derschchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Christian Dersch --- Approved! Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL (v3 or later)", "GPL (v3)", "Unknown or generated". 14 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/lupinix/1436347-python-pystray/licensecheck.txt ===> Fine, GPL(v3) is a false positive [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-pystray , python2-pystray-doc , python3-pystray , python3 -pystray-doc [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for
[Bug 1436347] Review Request: python-pystray - Provides system tray integration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436347 Christian Derschchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lupi...@mailbox.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lupi...@mailbox.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421605] Container Review Request: nginx - Platform for running nginx or building nginx-based application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421605 Pavel Zhukovchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pa...@zhukoff.net Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pa...@zhukoff.net --- Comment #2 from Pavel Zhukov --- I'll review it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435550] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-PluginBundle-PluginRemover - Remove plugins from a Dist ::Zilla plugin bundle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435550 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-PluginBundle-PluginRemover -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435542] Review Request: perl-Config-MVP-Slicer - Extract embedded configuration from a parent configuration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435542 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Config-MVP-Slicer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435375] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease - Bump and reversion version on release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435375 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435363] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile - Parse cpanfile for Dist:: Zilla prerequisites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435363 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435353] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-NameFromDirectory - Guess distribution name from the current directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435353 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-NameFromDirectory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1401302] Review Request: libarcus - Communication library between internal components for Ultimaker software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401302 --- Comment #21 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libarcus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436010] Review Request: php-google-apiclient1 - Client library for Google APIs (version 1)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436010 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-google-apiclient1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434997] Review Request: python-openidc-client - A python OpenID Connect client with token caching and management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434997 --- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-openidc-client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431448] Review Request: avogadro2 - Advanced molecular editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431448 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/avogadro2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435572] Review Request: golang-gopkg-retry-v1 - Provides a framework for retrying actions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435572 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-gopkg-retry-v1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435348] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ModuleBuildTiny - Build a Build.PL that uses Module ::Build::Tiny
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435348 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ModuleBuildTiny -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435330] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-LicenseFromModule - Extract license and copyright from its main module file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435330 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-LicenseFromModule -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435327] Review Request: golang-github-ojii-gettext.go - gettext functionality in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435327 --- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-ojii-gettext.go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435118] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeAnyFromPod - Automatically convert POD to a README in any format for Dist ::Zilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435118 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeAnyFromPod -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435295] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git - Update your git repository after release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435295 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1413646] Review Request: librealsense - Cross-platform camera capture for Intel RealSense
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413646 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/librealsense -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431298] Review Request: php-symfony3 - Symfony PHP framework ( version 3)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431298 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-symfony3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1415439] Review Request: nodejs-bunyan - A JSON logging library for node.js services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415439 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/nodejs-bunyan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1396790] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-freon - GNOME Shell extension to display system temperature , voltage, and fan speed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396790 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- gnome-shell-extension-freon-23-3.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e726bb2298 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436347] Review Request: python-pystray - Provides system tray integration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436347 --- Comment #3 from Björn "besser82" Esser--- Updated package: Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18648673 Urls: Spec URL: https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/python-pystray.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/python-pystray-0.14.2-0.2.fc27.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431528] Container Review Request: redis - Redis in-memory data structure store, used as database, cache and message broker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431528 Honza Horakchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||container-rev...@lists.fedo ||raproject.org Component|Package Review |Container Review Version|rawhide |26 Product|Fedora |Fedora Docker Images -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431546] Container Review Request: python - Platform for building and running Python 3.5 applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431546 Honza Horakchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||container-rev...@lists.fedo ||raproject.org Component|Package Review |Container Review Version|rawhide |26 Product|Fedora |Fedora Docker Images -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421605] Container Review Request: nginx - Platform for running nginx or building nginx-based application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421605 Honza Horakchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||container-rev...@lists.fedo ||raproject.org Component|Package Review |Container Review Version|rawhide |26 Product|Fedora |Fedora Docker Images -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1429680] Container Review Request: httpd - Platform for running Apache HTTP Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429680 Honza Horakchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||container-rev...@lists.fedo ||raproject.org Component|Package Review |Container Review Version|rawhide |26 Product|Fedora |Fedora Docker Images -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421601] Container Review Request: ruby - Platform for building and running Ruby applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421601 Honza Horakchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||container-rev...@lists.fedo ||raproject.org Component|Package Review |Container Review Version|rawhide |25 Product|Fedora |Fedora Docker Images --- Comment #3 from Honza Horak --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #1) > Just two quick comments: > > 1) FROM 25/s2i-base - Why is the "25" hardcoded? Isn't this supposed to > follow the Fedora releases? Every image will live under a namespace ("25" in this case) in the fedora registry, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Container:Guidelines > 2) "This image provides a Ruby 2.4 environment" but it seems you later > install Ruby 2.3. Particular ruby version will depend on Fedora version. You're right that for F25 it is ruby 2.3. Fixed now. > Anyway, where is this going to live? What is the workflow? Why just Ruby 2.3 > and no other Rubies? It should be compatible with what RHSCL images provide. It will live in fedore registry, see more at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Container:Review_Process https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Container:Guidelines (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #2) > And why is it "package review" when you are asking for container/dockerfile > review? I guess before it was the same process, now I see different product, so changing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1429680] Container Review Request: httpd - Platform for running Apache HTTP Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429680 Honza Horakchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1436796 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436796 [Bug 1436796] Tracker for Container Review Requests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421605] Container Review Request: nginx - Platform for running nginx or building nginx-based application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421605 Honza Horakchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1436796 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436796 [Bug 1436796] Tracker for Container Review Requests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431546] Container Review Request: python - Platform for building and running Python 3.5 applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431546 Honza Horakchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1436796 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436796 [Bug 1436796] Tracker for Container Review Requests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431528] Container Review Request: redis - Redis in-memory data structure store, used as database, cache and message broker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431528 Honza Horakchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1436796 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436796 [Bug 1436796] Tracker for Container Review Requests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421601] Container Review Request: ruby - Platform for building and running Ruby applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421601 Honza Horakchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1436796 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436796 [Bug 1436796] Tracker for Container Review Requests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1432955] Review Request: lld - The LLVM linker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432955 --- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko--- > %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}.src > %patch0 -p1 -b .pthread-fix -> %autosetup -n %{name}-%{version}.src -p1 > mkdir -p _build -> mkdir %{_target_platform} > make %{?_smp_mflags} -> %make_build > make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} -> %make_install > %post devel -p /sbin/ldconfig > %postun devel -p /sbin/ldconfig no need for triggers in devel subpkg > Summary: A C language family front-end for LLVM That sounds very weird. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1433758] Review Request: a52dec - Small test program for liba52
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433758 Peter Lemenkovchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1436417 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436417 [Bug 1436417] Enable ac3 with liba52 in alsa-plugins -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436734] New: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - Tools for managing the Oracle Cluster Filesystem 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436734 Bug ID: 1436734 Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - Tools for managing the Oracle Cluster Filesystem 2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: robinlee.s...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/ocfs2-tools.spec SRPM URL: https://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/ocfs2-tools-1.8.5-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Programs to manage the OCFS2 cluster file system, including mkfs.ocfs2, tunefs.ocfs2 and fsck.ocfs2. OCFS2 is a general purpose extent based shared disk cluster file system. It supports 64 bit inode numbers, and has automatically extending metadata groups which may also make it attractive for non-clustered use. OCFS2 leverages some well tested kernel technologies, such as JBD - the same journaling subsystem in use by ext3. Fedora Account System Username: cheeselee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1358293] Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358293 Peter Lemenkovchanged: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357483] Review Request: twinkle - SIP-based VoIP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357483 Bug 1357483 depends on bug 1358293, which changed state. Bug 1358293 Summary: Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358293 What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|NOTABUG |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1358293] Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358293 Peter Lemenkovchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|NOTABUG |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #25 from Peter Lemenkov --- I'd like to reopen this considering recent legal changes mentioned above. Just to make sure it will be on the radar. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435550] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-PluginBundle-PluginRemover - Remove plugins from a Dist ::Zilla plugin bundle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435550 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-PluginBundle-PluginRemover-0.104-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) 1 perl(Dist::Zilla::Util) 1 perl(List::Util) >= 1.45 1 perl(Moose::Role) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-PluginBundle-PluginRemover-0.104-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Dist::Zilla::Role::PluginBundle::PluginRemover) = 0.104 1 perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-PluginBundle-PluginRemover = 0.104-1.fc27 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-PluginBundle-PluginRemover* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package looks good. Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435550] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Role-PluginBundle-PluginRemover - Remove plugins from a Dist ::Zilla plugin bundle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435550 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435542] Review Request: perl-Config-MVP-Slicer - Extract embedded configuration from a parent configuration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435542 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Config-MVP-Slicer-0.302-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Moose) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Config-MVP-Slicer-0.302-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Config::MVP::Slicer) = 0.302 1 perl-Config-MVP-Slicer = 0.302-1.fc27 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Config-MVP-Slicer* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package looks good. Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435542] Review Request: perl-Config-MVP-Slicer - Extract embedded configuration from a parent configuration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435542 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com QA Contact|jples...@redhat.com |extras...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435542] Review Request: perl-Config-MVP-Slicer - Extract embedded configuration from a parent configuration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435542 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1428974] Review Request: rgbds - A development package for Game Boy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428974 --- Comment #17 from Sanqui (David Labský)--- Thank you for help and approving the package! I have reported failing tests upstream and we'll talk about how to improve them for the future: https://github.com/rednex/rgbds/issues/144 I will look into attempting some reviews soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435375] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease - Bump and reversion version on release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435375 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease-0.06-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.8.0 1 perl(Dist::Zilla) >= 4.2 1 perl(Dist::Zilla::Role::FileFinderUser) 1 perl(Dist::Zilla::Role::FileMunger) 1 perl(Moose) 1 perl(Version::Next) >= 0.002 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(version) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease-0.06-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Dist::Zilla::Plugin::ReversionOnRelease) = 0.06 1 perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease = 0.06-1.fc27 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease* perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US VersionFromModule -> Oversimplification perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US CopyFilesFromRelease perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US VersionFromModule -> Oversimplification perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US CopyFilesFromRelease 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package looks good. Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1401302] Review Request: libarcus - Communication library between internal components for Ultimaker software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401302 --- Comment #20 from Miro Hrončok--- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #19) > (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #17) > > Few comments from me, but none is blocker: > > > BuildRequires: python3-sip > > > > This is not needed, because there is already: > > > BuildRequires: python3-sip-devel > > > > It's guaranteed by guidelines that it will bring-in the python3-sip package > > automatically. Done. > > > %if "%{_libdir}" == "/usr/lib64" > > > sed -i 's|DESTINATION lib|DESTINATION lib64|g' CMakeLists.txt > > > sed -i 's|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR lib|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR lib64|g' > > > CMakeLists.txt > > > %endif > > > > Maybe simpler way: > > sed -i 's|DESTINATION lib|DESTINATION %{_lib}|g' CMakeLists.txt > > sed -i 's|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR lib|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR %{_lib}|g' Done. > > Is the patch needed? Couldn't be the same behavior achieved by e.g.: > > cmake -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON > Will try. Works. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436010] Review Request: php-google-apiclient1 - Client library for Google APIs (version 1)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436010 Remi Colletchanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet --- +# Package rename (php-google-apiclient => php-google-apiclient1) +Obsoletes: php-google-apiclient-examples < 2:1.1.7-4 +Provides: php-google-apiclient-examples = 2:%{version}-%{release} + [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. No more blocker == APPROVED == -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414216] Review Request: php-gettext-gettext - PHP gettext manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414216 Remi Colletchanged: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Remi Collet --- Sorry for long delay (don't why is doesn't appear to me before...) [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/php/Gettext(php- gettext-languages), which is required. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. See phpci-src.log => missing php-dom ans php-simplexml -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414216] Review Request: php-gettext-gettext - PHP gettext manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414216 --- Comment #10 from Remi Collet--- Created attachment 1266921 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1266921=edit review.txt Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1414216 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, PHP, Shell-api -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414216] Review Request: php-gettext-gettext - PHP gettext manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414216 Remi Colletchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet --- Created attachment 1266920 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1266920=edit phpci-src.log phpCompatInfo version 5.0.6 DB version 1.19.0 built Mar 17 2017 06:44:54 CET run in "src" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1436010] Review Request: php-google-apiclient1 - Client library for Google APIs (version 1)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436010 --- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski--- (In reply to Remi Collet from comment #3) > [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. > Conflicts present for safe upgrade path > > [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > Provides are present. > You could have kept epoch = 2 (raising release to 3) > BTW, this means you will also have to set epoch to 3 in v2 package > Hopefuly, dependent packages should only use composer dep. I was originally going for release 1 on the new pkg, but to be honest, I don't know why :/ I took your advise and bumped the release (4, not 3) and kept epoch 2 in the obsoletes/provides. > => Missing "Obsoletes" in the examples sub-package Added > [x]: Latest version is packaged. > Lastest compatible v1, by design > > > Single blocker, missing obsoletes. Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/8407132e85687b5f7765244b0c42d185bc6cf3c1/php-google-apiclient1/php-google-apiclient1.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-google-apiclient1-1.1.7-4.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435375] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReversionOnRelease - Bump and reversion version on release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435375 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435363] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile - Parse cpanfile for Dist:: Zilla prerequisites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435363 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile-0.08-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) 1 perl(Dist::Zilla) >= 4.300017 1 perl(Dist::Zilla::Role::MetaProvider) 1 perl(Dist::Zilla::Role::PrereqSource) 1 perl(Module::CPANfile) >= 0.903 1 perl(Moose) 1 perl(Try::Tiny) >= 0.1 1 perl(strict) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile-0.08-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Dist::Zilla::Plugin::Prereqs::FromCPANfile) = 0.08 1 perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile = 0.08-1.fc27 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile* perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cpanfile -> campanile perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpanfile -> campanile perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US CPANFile -> Campanile perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cpanfile -> campanile perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpanfile -> campanile perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US CPANFile -> Campanile 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package looks good. Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1401302] Review Request: libarcus - Communication library between internal components for Ultimaker software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401302 --- Comment #19 from Miro Hrončok--- (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #17) > Few comments from me, but none is blocker: > > BuildRequires: python3-sip > > This is not needed, because there is already: > > BuildRequires: python3-sip-devel > > It's guaranteed by guidelines that it will bring-in the python3-sip package > automatically. Right. > > > %if "%{_libdir}" == "/usr/lib64" > > sed -i 's|DESTINATION lib|DESTINATION lib64|g' CMakeLists.txt > > sed -i 's|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR lib|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR lib64|g' > > CMakeLists.txt > > %endif > > Maybe simpler way: > sed -i 's|DESTINATION lib|DESTINATION %{_lib}|g' CMakeLists.txt > sed -i 's|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR lib|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR %{_lib}|g' Sure. > But maybe better is to patch the cmake files (and persuade upstream) to > incorporate support for -DLIB_SUFFIX=64, in this way it will work out of the > box. Will do later. > Is the patch needed? Couldn't be the same behavior achieved by e.g.: > cmake -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON Will try. Thnak you both. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1401302] Review Request: libarcus - Communication library between internal components for Ultimaker software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401302 Pavlina Moravcova Varekovachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Pavlina Moravcova Varekova --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "AGPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* BSD (3 clause)". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/pavlina/work/review/209/1401302-libarcus/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib64/cmake(qt5-qtbase) [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [-]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 7 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-arcus , libarcus-debuginfo [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is
[Bug 1401302] Review Request: libarcus - Communication library between internal components for Ultimaker software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401302 --- Comment #17 from Jaroslav Škarvada--- Few comments from me, but none is blocker: > BuildRequires: python3-sip This is not needed, because there is already: > BuildRequires: python3-sip-devel It's guaranteed by guidelines that it will bring-in the python3-sip package automatically. > %if "%{_libdir}" == "/usr/lib64" > sed -i 's|DESTINATION lib|DESTINATION lib64|g' CMakeLists.txt > sed -i 's|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR lib|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR lib64|g' > CMakeLists.txt > %endif Maybe simpler way: sed -i 's|DESTINATION lib|DESTINATION %{_lib}|g' CMakeLists.txt sed -i 's|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR lib|PYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR %{_lib}|g' But maybe better is to patch the cmake files (and persuade upstream) to incorporate support for -DLIB_SUFFIX=64, in this way it will work out of the box. Is the patch needed? Couldn't be the same behavior achieved by e.g.: cmake -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1401302] Review Request: libarcus - Communication library between internal components for Ultimaker software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401302 --- Comment #15 from Miro Hrončok--- (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #14) > > libarcus-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > > This one is false positive, probably due to cmake files and DSO symlink (no > binary content), thus probably also OK. Exactly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1212242] Review Request: golang-github-edsrzf-mmap-go - A portable mmap package for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212242 Fabio Valentinichanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|1431740 | Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2017-03-28 05:28:14 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- Closing this review request in favor of my new one, since it seems to be dead and there hasn't been input from the submitter for quite some time. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1431568 *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431740 [Bug 1431740] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-internal - Shared dependencies for other cznic Go libraries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431568] Review Request: golang-github-edsrzf-mmap-go - Portable mmap package for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431568 Fabio Valentinichanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ggill...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- *** Bug 1212242 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431740] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-internal - Shared dependencies for other cznic Go libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431740 Fabio Valentinichanged: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1212242 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212242 [Bug 1212242] Review Request: golang-github-edsrzf-mmap-go - A portable mmap package for Go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431568] Review Request: golang-github-edsrzf-mmap-go - Portable mmap package for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431568 Fabio Valentinichanged: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- Reopening, since the old review request is dead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431740] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-internal - Shared dependencies for other cznic Go libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431740 Bug 1431740 depends on bug 1431568, which changed state. Bug 1431568 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-edsrzf-mmap-go - Portable mmap package for Go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431568 What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1411961] Review Request: golang-github-milochristiansen-axis2 - A simple virtual filesystem API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411961 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini--- Pinging submitter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1411962] Review Request: golang-github-milochristiansen-lua - A Lua 5.3 VM and compiler written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411962 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini--- Pinging submitter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431735] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-sortutil - Supplemental utilities for Go' s sort package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431735 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini--- Pinging reviewer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431736] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-strutil - Supplemental utilities for Go' s strings package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431736 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini--- Pinging reviewer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1435363] Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Prereqs-FromCPANfile - Parse cpanfile for Dist:: Zilla prerequisites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435363 Jitka Plesnikovachanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431587] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-mathutil - Supplemental utilities for Go' s rand and math packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431587 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-cznic-mathutil-0-0.2.git1447ad2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-04280ba6b3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419361] Review Request: js-jquery-datetimepicker - jQuery Plugin Date and Time Picker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419361 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System--- js-jquery-datetimepicker-2.5.4-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ae34b54bff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421358] Review Request: js-jquery-noty - A jQuery notification plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421358 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- js-jquery-noty-2.4.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d4fd648e9d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org