https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1243530
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1198312
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #43 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Antoine Martin from comment #41)
I'm still puzzled about the fact that this ticket has been stuck for well over
a year.
seems everyone doing some work on this has run out of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #41 from Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk ---
0.14.0 is out and will be a LTS release (18 months+) tailor made for packaging
into distributions. *Many* of the changes were in fact related to RPM packaging
and security.
In no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Stephen Gauthier sgauth...@spikes.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #38 from Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk ---
Oh, and since we are the new effective upstream for python-webm, it is worth
mentioning that we have now fixed the memory leak in there too.
AFAICT, this affects the version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #37 from Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk ---
And now 0.12.0 is out:
http://xpra.org/trac/wiki/News#a2014-03-23
Just one packaging update in there: libfakeXinerama has been added as an
optional dependency for making fullscreen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #36 from Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk ---
Please note that as of version 0.11.0, released just now:
http://lists.devloop.org.uk/pipermail/shifter-users/2014-January/000792.html
A number of dependencies have been added or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Sebastian Dyroff fed...@dyroff.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@dyroff.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #34 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Sorry, meant to update this to the latest upstream last night but I forgot.
:-(
--
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #29 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Antoine Martin from comment #28)
don't ship webm stuff that doesn't work without ffmpeg anyway
I don't know who told you that, this is wrong.
webm (aka webp)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #30 from Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk ---
Although they are related, webm != vpx
webm (aka webp) is for single frames, vpx is for video streams.
Xpra's webp codec does not require anything beyond python-webm, be aware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #31 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Antoine Martin from comment #30)
Although they are related, webm != vpx
webm (aka webp) is for single frames, vpx is for video streams.
Ah, it does WebP not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #32 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra.spec
SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra-0.10.4-2.fc19.src.rpm
Koji:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #27 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra.spec
SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra-0.10.4-1.fc19.src.rpm
Koji:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #28 from Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk ---
don't ship webm stuff that doesn't work without ffmpeg anyway
I don't know who told you that, this is wrong.
webm (aka webp) has nothing to do with ffmpeg.
VPX, which is a distant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #26 from Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk ---
0.10 released today, please be aware of some packaging issues that *will*
affect the way you were planning on doing things (unbundling libs):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #22 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Christopher: in comment 16 Karel said he wouldn't mind if someone takes this
over if he gets busy and forgets about this, so feel free to take this over if
you want this to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|kvo...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #25 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to T.C. Hollingsworth from comment #24)
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #23)
I'm sorry for some reason I can't take this.
Maybe because the fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #21 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #20)
TC I think you can close the ticket on rpmfusion.
If you look more closely you'll notice that the only open review there is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||990805
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #20 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
TC I think you can close the ticket on rpmfusion.
BTW what's the progress here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #19 from Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk ---
More bugfixes today (some more important ones this time around).
Just (wrongly) posted this on the rpmfusion ticket: I haven't tested systemd
integration, but others have:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #18 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Upstream made some more minor bugfixes.
--
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra.spec
SRPM:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Bug 928609 depends on bug 953701, which changed state.
Bug 953701 Summary: Review Request: python-webm - Python wrapper to WebM
libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953701
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Bug 928609 depends on bug 953699, which changed state.
Bug 953699 Summary: Review Request: python-rencode - Web safe object
pickling/unpickling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953699
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #17 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
No worries, it took that three weeks to ready the deps anyway. ;-) Next week
is fine.
In the meantime, here's a minor upstream bugfix update.
--
Spec:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #16 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com ---
Hi, I'm sorry but I got buried in some other stuff, if anyone is able to pick
up this feel free to do so, otherwise I'll take a look again not until the next
week (which
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #15 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
python-webm is now in Rawhide and updates-testing for all active branches as
well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #13 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra.spec
SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/xpra/xpra-0.9.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
* Thu May 02 2013 T.C. Hollingsworth
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #14 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
This update fixes a small glitch in the rencode unbundling.
Also, python-rencode is in F(17|18|19) updates-testing now, and python-webm is
waiting on git.
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #11 from Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk ---
[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
^ there is rencode.pyx - http://code.google.com/p/rencode/
FYI: xpra can be built without rencode:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #12 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Hi there, xpra maintainer here.
Is there any particular reason why you didn't contact us at all about this?
It seems to me that:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|953669
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #6 from Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
- install fails because of dependency on gstreamer-plugins-ugly, this
belongs to the rpmfusion part
- gtk-update-icon-cache and
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NEEDSWORK
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #5 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the review!
(In reply to comment #4)
a few complaints from the fedora-review tool:
- install fails because of dependency on
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
--- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com ---
Unfortunately the vpx codec requires libswscale, which is part of ffmpeg. :-(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
52 matches
Mail list logo
