https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320
--- Comment #12 from Yanko Kaneti ---
Right, should have probably said "mesa has no vulkan drivers on s390x"
I am not seeing myself investigating the s390x test failures anytime soon. So
its either ExcludeArch, or someone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473543
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Kisela ---
(In reply to Sebastian Kisela from comment #5)
> Thanks!
>
> > Everything looks fine, just update summary and description as discussed and
> > I will set fedora-review+.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474694
--- Comment #2 from Jiří Vymazal ---
*** Bug 1420336 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341
--- Comment #45 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
Hello Vincent and thanks for your work and your patience with the package
review.
Technically all seems fine now. The package builds and works as expected.
[x]: License
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474694
--- Comment #3 from Mark ---
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/libcbor_review/raw/master/f/libcbor.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pagure.io/libcbor_review/raw/master/f/libcbor-0.5.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description: Libcbor is a C library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451407
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/annobin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468971
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/freshmaker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320
--- Comment #6 from Yanko Kaneti ---
2017.07-0.3.20170725gitaa0de26
- Add %%check, running the meson tests, as per review (#1473320)
http://declera.com/~yaneti/vkmark/vkmark.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320
c72...@yahoo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320
--- Comment #11 from c72...@yahoo.de ---
Thanks for the update.
It is a few tests, which are failing on s390x
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5948/20755948/build.log
test cases: 14 | 13 passed | 1 failed
assertions: 176 | 173
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467003
--- Comment #7 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
> Do all of those work on EL7 for example?
Yes, on EPEL7 it will work fine.
> They can be replaced, but the others are generally more widely supported and
> it's really just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474694
Jiří Vymazal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvyma...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420336
Jiří Vymazal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320
--- Comment #13 from c72...@yahoo.de ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474948
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467003
--- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson ---
(In reply to Vitaly Zaitsev from comment #3)
> > %setup -q
>
> Can be replaced to %autosetup. Also you should add BuildRequires: gcc.
>
> > make %{?_smp_mflags} V=1
>
> Should be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467003
--- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson ---
(In reply to Vitaly Zaitsev from comment #4)
> > License: LGPLv2
>
> Must be replaced to License: LGPLv2+.
Fixed locally. Anything else?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466844
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(limburgher@gmail. |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475035
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320
--- Comment #10 from Yanko Kaneti ---
2017.07-0.5.20170725gitaa0de26
- ExcludeArch s390x for now
SPEC: http://declera.com/~yaneti/vkmark/vkmark.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228
Bug ID: 1475228
Summary: Review Request: tpm2-abrmd - TPM2 access broker and
resource manager daemon
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474694
--- Comment #1 from Radovan Sroka ---
Link to repo is not sufficient.
Your comment should contain at least:
...
Spec URL:
SRPM URL:
Description:
Fedora Account System Username:
...
fedora-review tool needs to parse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634
--- Comment #17 from Fabio Valentini ---
Updated .spec and SRPM files (with a rebased patch for the build script) for
the newest 0.14.33 upstream release:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228
--- Comment #1 from Yunying Sun ---
Upstream repository: https://github.com/01org/tpm2-abrmd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473543
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Kisela ---
Thanks!
> Everything looks fine, just update summary and description as discussed and
> I will set fedora-review+.
Updated specfile URL (with related SRPM) below.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320
--- Comment #5 from c72...@yahoo.de ---
vkmark includes tests. Could you please include them in the %check section of
the spec file.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25check_section
Tests are here after building:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320
--- Comment #8 from c72...@yahoo.de ---
mesa-vulkan-devel is only available for x86_64.
See results of Koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20753589
This means, that other architectures have to be excluded using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320
--- Comment #9 from Yanko Kaneti ---
2017.07-0.4.20170725gitaa0de26
- Vulkan backend only available on x86_64, condition the mesa-vulkan-devel
SPEC: http://declera.com/~yaneti/vkmark/vkmark.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419330
--- Comment #15 from Robin Lee ---
License tag and latest changelog entry are not fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320
c72...@yahoo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c72...@yahoo.de
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468545
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1475132
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463429
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1475132
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474694
Radovan Sroka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475035
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419330
--- Comment #14 from sensor@gmail.com ---
SPEC:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-25-x86_64/00583646-deepin-menu/deepin-menu.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466844
dhodo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474948
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/compat-tracker1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320
--- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/vkmark
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474948
--- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #2)
Thanks for the review!
> Just two minor things I'd change:
>
> 1) add '%dir %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0' to %files so that the directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475035
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pyxs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788
--- Comment #10 from Robin Lee ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474694
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483
Bug ID: 1475483
Summary: Review Request: qbs - Cross platform build tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460759
--- Comment #4 from Pradeep Kilambi ---
Thanks Alfredo, i will rebase this to 1.2.1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1466775
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460759
--- Comment #5 from Pradeep Kilambi ---
Here is updated spec and src:
SPEC: https://pkilambi.fedorapeople.org/python-daiquiri/python-daiquiri.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464194
Rutvij Karkhanis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473543
Nikola Forró changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475035
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pyxs-0.4.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-ccd9d17ed6
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475035
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475536
Bug ID: 1475536
Summary: Review Request: python-pygments2 - Syntax highlighting
engine written in Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475564
Bug ID: 1475564
Summary: Review Request: python-pytest-fixture-config - Simple
configuration objects for Py.test fixtures
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268703
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268703
--- Comment #2 from Roman Joost ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268703
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475536
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475536
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474930
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
60 matches
Mail list logo