https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380826
--- Comment #17 from Devrim Gündüz ---
Hi,
(In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #15)
> Devrim, I have a question,
>
> why pgadmin4 are using psycopg instead of python-PyMySQL ?
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380826
--- Comment #18 from Devrim Gündüz ---
(In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #16)
> python-wsgiref has been retired from fedora, is there alternatives for him ?
>
> last release from 2006
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536878
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536878
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
elementary-wallpapers-5.0-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #73 from Jan Pokorný ---
Ok, if the expectations are set like this, meaning that the future
obstacles I was worried about -- mostly related to parallel pkgconfig
files as their names form de facto
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550743
--- Comment #6 from Germano Massullo ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #5)
> From what do you derive the version?
Previous maintainer used to get version from ubuntu meta package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550685
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
python-click is packaged, you've got the list of Requires in the setup.py:
requirements = [
'future>=0.15.2',
'binaryornot>=0.2.0',
'jinja2>=2.7',
'click>=5.0',
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550743
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/open-eid
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550743
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550743
--- Comment #4 from Germano Massullo ---
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/open-eid/open-eid.spec
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/open-eid/open-eid-17.12-1.fc27.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550740
--- Comment #5 from Germano Massullo ---
IMHO if there is not anything else to correct, we could proceed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910699
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380826
--- Comment #15 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ---
Devrim, I have a question,
why pgadmin4 are using psycopg instead of python-PyMySQL ?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=20789
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380826
--- Comment #16 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ---
python-wsgiref has been retired from fedora, is there alternatives for him ?
last release from 2006
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/wsgiref
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550743
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
From what do you derive the version?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551107
Bug ID: 1551107
Summary: Review Request: nulib2 - Disk and file archive program
for NuFX (.SDK, .BXY) archives
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550655
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550740
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550740
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/webextension-token-signing
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550396
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550685
--- Comment #4 from Brett Lentz ---
Thanks for the pointer. :)
It looks like poyo and jinja2-time are not packaged. Everything else listed in
setup.py appears to already be packaged.
So, same question - will that block
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550334
--- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #5)
> There's a Makefile to build the sphinx doc
> https://github.com/tobgu/pyrsistent/blob/master/docs/Makefile
I am
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550655
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tree-format. You may commit to the
branch "f27" in about 10 minutes.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550740
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551153
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551153
Bug ID: 1551153
Summary: Review Request: tuned-profiles-nfv-host-bin - Binaries
that are needed for the NFV host Tuned profile
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #74 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto ---
(In reply to Jan Pokorný from comment #73)
> Ok, if the expectations are set like this, meaning that the future
> obstacles I was worried about -- mostly related to parallel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550319
--- Comment #8 from Athos Ribeiro ---
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/flask_gravatar/__pycache__
Has no owner. You should do the same %dir procedure for the __pycache__
directory in the python3 package %files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #72 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Just for been clear. The original problem with fdk-aac was never about patent
(at least on the 3rd party level). It's all about copyright.
You are not changing anything to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #66 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto ---
(In reply to Jan Pokorný from comment #65)
> [re A.]
>
> > The debuginfo generation is default: on in fedora. Those statements
> > have no effect on fedora unless
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910699
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
pagekite-0.5.9.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-a7578c5325
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #65 from Jan Pokorný ---
[re A.]
> The debuginfo generation is default: on in fedora. Those statements
> have no effect on fedora unless explicitly overridden. Those are
> coming from upstream spec file that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550330
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550334
--- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ---
theres no sphinx docs, the docs are on README / README.RST
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550334
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
There's a Makefile to build the sphinx doc
https://github.com/tobgu/pyrsistent/blob/master/docs/Makefile
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550740
--- Comment #2 from Germano Massullo ---
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/webextension-token-signing/webextension-token-signing.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550743
--- Comment #2 from Germano Massullo ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - Obsoletes: estonianidcard
>
> You should add the Provides too. See
Done
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550330
--- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
there are no docs and the tests are failing, I will report the bug about the
tests to upstream.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550330
--- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ---
I verified and there's no tests when the pypi source are used,
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Flask-Paranoid
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Eric Harney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ehar...@redhat.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #73 from Kevin Kofler ---
> It was re-added in comment #54, but I see no actual legal questions there:
> only > technical objections.
Comment #52 is a legal question. It is definitely not technical.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #67 from Jan Pokorný ---
> Not sure, we received the patch from the Suse maintainers, asking
> explicitly to enable it. Given that it didn´t affect Fedora I didn´t
> feel the need to investigate further.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #68 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto ---
>
> Btw. I am still thinking how the future protocol bumps will work out,
> shouldn't the pkgconfig file contain the versioning in its name
> as well (see dbus, glib,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550396
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550740
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550396
--- Comment #4 from MartinKG ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #71 from Jan Pokorný ---
Ok, the same argument can be applied to implicit versioning of
subpackages (BuildRequires: libknet-devel%{?_isa} < 2.0), why
do you want to treat these two things (subpackages and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550743
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550396
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-netspeed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550334
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #69 from Jan Pokorný ---
But the client programs will likely use the pkgconfig dependency in the
build setup, and that has to be differentiated eventually in case it
cares about the protocol version.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550396
--- Comment #2 from MartinKG ---
Spec URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/gnome-shell-extension-netspeed.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377631
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #70 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto ---
(In reply to Jan Pokorný from comment #69)
> But the client programs will likely use the pkgconfig dependency in the
> build setup, and that has to be differentiated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550396
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550655
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550685
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550740
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Germano Massullo from comment #2)
> https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/webextension-token-signing/
> webextension-token-signing.spec
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550740
--- Comment #4 from Germano Massullo ---
Okay thank you
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550655
--- Comment #2 from Brett Lentz ---
Spec & SRPM updated. Same URL as in Comment #1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550685
--- Comment #2 from Brett Lentz ---
I've added the python-provides. Spec & SRPM URLs from comment #1 are updated.
However, building the docs requires additional sphinx contrib modules that
aren't currently in fedora. Let
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507103
--- Comment #72 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto ---
(In reply to Jan Pokorný from comment #71)
> Ok, the same argument can be applied to implicit versioning of
> subpackages (BuildRequires: libknet-devel%{?_isa} < 2.0), why
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550743
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Obsoletes: estonianidcard
Provides: estonianidcard
You didn't include the version you replace, nor the one you provide instead.
--
You are receiving this mail
63 matches
Mail list logo