https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824016
--- Comment #3 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
> License: ISC and MIT and Unlicensed and BSD
> # miniz is unlicensed: http://unlicense.org
Unlicensed -> Unlicense.
Would be even better to write a detailed distribution of licenses, i.e.
something
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
thrnc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811774
--- Comment #2 from Breno ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/brandfbb/puppet-6-in-epel8-testing/epel-8-x86_64/01339440-rubygem-puppetserver-ca/rubygem-puppetserver-ca.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811777
--- Comment #2 from Breno ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/brandfbb/puppet-6-in-epel8-testing/epel-8-x86_64/01339452-rubygem-puppet-resource_api/rubygem-puppet-resource_api.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816301
--- Comment #11 from mark.ole...@esi-group.com ---
Currently rebuilding with the various suggested changes, with /usr/lib/openfoam
for the common root (instead of /opt).
I would still ideally like to have some more granularity in subpackages,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824780
Bug ID: 1824780
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-optimist - Commandline option
parser for Ruby
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824780
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini ---
I think you should add "%exclude %{gem_cache}" to the %files section.
While it's not mentioned in the packaging guidelines, but this is generated by
gem2rpm, and this is what existing rubygem packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824780
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
And I'll contact upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
I've applied the patch from the prior review to fix this issue.
SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gnucobol/gnucobol-3.0-0.rc1.1.fc31.src.rpm
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816301
--- Comment #13 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
(In reply to david08741 from comment #12)
> (In reply to mark.olesen from comment #11)
> > Currently rebuilding with the various suggested changes, with
> > /usr/lib/openfoam for the common
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816301
--- Comment #12 from david08...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to mark.olesen from comment #11)
> Currently rebuilding with the various suggested changes, with
> /usr/lib/openfoam for the common root (instead of /opt).
I cannot find the relevent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816301
--- Comment #14 from mark.ole...@esi-group.com ---
The nest example is very nice. I've been struggling to find a definitive guide
of what is actually allowed in a spec file. The rpm.org has things, but seems
to be out of date.
Will get back
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #7 from Eric Sandeen ---
Upstream thread is at
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/001201d60e12%248454abb0%248cfe0310...@samsung.com/t/
The question, and maintainer response summarized:
> For the sake of sanity of the distributions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824788
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1824780 (rubygem-optimist)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824780
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1824788
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820391
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/RediSearch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848
Bug ID: 1824848
Summary: Review Request: jc - JSONifies the output of dozens of
commands
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848
Kelly Brazil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #5 from Artur Iwicki ---
I know, I remember that from Anton's review request. But I think if anything,
that's a reason to try and patch the configure script, rather than not use the
optflags.
Which reminds me, it might be a good
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824788
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-hiera-eyaml
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820805
Jakub Čajka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824780
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824788
Bug ID: 1824788
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-hiera-eyaml - Hiera backend
for decrypting encrypted yaml properties
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824788
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
I'll fix the release and group.
Regarding flags, if we build with optflags, the -strong flag breaks the build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Toshio beat me to it. :) https://sourceforge.net/p/open-cobol/patches/49/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824780
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-optimist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820805
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Čajka ---
Generally looks good to me. I see one issue, see the review report.
Issues:
===
- Package contains bundled copies of libraries. xpc and gioctl under MIT/Expat
license. It would be good to mention that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815727
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-b1cd8343de has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-11b468e6fb has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820852
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-37f557d123 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820846
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825012
Bug ID: 1825012
Summary: Review Request: soapy-uhd - Soapy SDR plugins for UHD
supported SDR devices
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824016
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823599
--- Comment #2 from Bob Hepple ---
Fixed FSF address - that's a problem that creeps in when a package has been
around nearly 20 years!
SPEC URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815728
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-c38161972d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733023
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a24e0792d7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
--- Comment #12 from Bob Hepple ---
Thanks Aleksei!
I've requested the repos for wayvnc & neatvnc for rawhide, f31, f32
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810897
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824348
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824016
--- Comment #4 from Bob Hepple ---
This is important stuff, so let's make it right ...
SPEC URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/wayvnc/fedora-31-x86_64/01339484-neatvnc/neatvnc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822561
--- Comment #4 from Anna Khaitovich ---
New spec:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/akhaitov/wget2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01338615-wget2/wget2.spec
New srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823419
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824467
Bug ID: 1824467
Summary: Review Request: freeopcua - Open Source C++ OPC-UA
Server and Client Library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820845
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820845
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820845
--- Comment #3 from Germano Massullo ---
(In reply to Jakub Čajka from comment #2)
> (In reply to Germano Massullo from comment #1)
> > Created attachment 1678658 [details]
> > errors
> >
> > Since golang-github-nbutton23-zxcvbn is not yet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820854
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820891
--- Comment #2 from Germano Massullo ---
My error, the not working URL is
https://github.com/chifflier/nfqueue-go/nfqueue
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820891
--- Comment #1 from Germano Massullo ---
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #0)
> Spec URL:
> https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-chifflier-nfqueue.
> spec
URL is not working. I am using spec file inside the srpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820845
Jakub Čajka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jca...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820854
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820891
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820891
--- Comment #3 from Germano Massullo ---
Upstream URL must be https://github.com/chifflier/nfqueue-go
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
57 matches
Mail list logo
