https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ed997a6971 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #52 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #51 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #50 from markusN ---
Ah, I see. I have requested there to add PDAL to the list, it was immediately
done:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/PDAL/c/0850914050c8e76ca5bd933d0bfe1a58a5d5dfb0?branch=master
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #49 from Sandro Mani ---
That's due to the boost 1.73 rebuild which started 2020-05-28, see [1].
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/XEHCL2HROZQXQXQUWZF26VVCPAYFEGR5/
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #48 from markusN ---
Well, still some issues - from the new BZ#1843094:
Your package (PDAL) Fails To Install in Fedora 33:
can't install PDAL-libs:
- nothing provides libboost_filesystem.so.1.69.0()(64bit) needed by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #47 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #46 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #44 from Sandro Mani ---
Two variants:
a) If no third-party consumer of libpdal_plugin_* exists (which I would
expect), then yes, drop the unversioned symblinks
b) Otherwise, drop these two lines
# We don't want to provide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #45 from Sandro Mani ---
Note that more than just
-%{_libdir}/libpdal_plugin_kernel_fauxplugin.so
-%{_libdir}/libpdal_plugin_reader_pgpointcloud.so
-%{_libdir}/libpdal_plugin_writer_pgpointcloud.so
you'll want to %exlcude or rm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #43 from markusN ---
Just to be sure, you mean to change like this?
diff --git a/PDAL.spec b/PDAL.spec
index d3a4d94..1a41e56 100644
--- a/PDAL.spec
+++ b/PDAL.spec
@@ -200,9 +200,6 @@ ctest -V
%files devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #42 from Sandro Mani ---
Oh - just drop the provides filtering in this case, I thought they were .so
only, but indeed also the versioned symlinks exist.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #41 from markusN ---
Unfortunately there is still an issue (BZ#1841616):
Your package (PDAL) Fails To Install in Fedora 33:
can't install PDAL-devel:
- nothing provides libpdal_plugin_kernel_fauxplugin.so.10()(64bit) needed by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #40 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #39 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #38 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/PDAL
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #37 from markusN ---
Thanks for all your guidance!
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/25323
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #36 from Sandro Mani
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #35 from markusN ---
I have dropped those lines and uploaded the final (?) SPEC file again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
markusN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1692850 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #33 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
markusN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1692236 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
markusN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1691395 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #30 from markusN ---
Thanks for the updates, much appreciated!
New RPMs:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45074748
rpmlint only shows a few warnings (see above, two have already been addressed
upstream).
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #29 from Sandro Mani ---
> I went through the licensecheck.txt file and verified the unclear extractions
> within the files.
> Would the following change be ok (twice in the spec file)?
> -%license LICENSE.txt
> +%license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #28 from markusN ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #27)
> Created attachment 1692463 [details]
> licensecheck.txt
>
> Full review below.
Thanks for the new review.
> Issues:
>
> [!]: License field in the package spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #27 from Sandro Mani ---
Created attachment 1692463
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1692463=edit
licensecheck.txt
Full review below. Issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #26 from markusN ---
(In reply to markusN from comment #5)
> (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #4)
> > - PDAL-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpdal_base.so.11
> > exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
> >
> > You should report
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
markusN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1672170
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #25 from Sandro Mani ---
Posting links for fedora review:
Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/PDAL.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/806/45000806/PDAL-2.1.0-4.fc33.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
markusN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1691970 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #23 from markusN ---
As suggested, I have modified the test to ignore the test failures on
problematic arches.
neteler's scratch build of PDAL-2.1.0-4.fc31.src.rpm for f33 completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #22 from Sandro Mani ---
As for the test, you can ignore the test failures on problematic arches, say
%ifarch armv7hl aarch64 s390x
ctest || true
%else
ctest
%endif
Generally it's not mandatory for tests to pass, but especially
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
markusN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1691203 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #20 from markusN ---
Concerning the library versioning (answer by the PDAL maintainer):
> The library versioning adopted by PDAL is pretty unusual, i.e. in
> CMakeLists.txt
This was a bug that is fixed in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #19 from Sandro Mani ---
> OK, but I don't get it running.
How so? Are there other errors?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #18 from markusN ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #17)
> Is there any other test failing other than pgpointcloudtest?
Yes, only this one. FWIW, in the openSuSe PDAL package they doesn't test at all
and in Debian
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #17 from Sandro Mani ---
Is there any other test failing other than pgpointcloudtest? It would be better
to leave out the " || echo "Ignoring test failures"", as otherwise no-one will
notice the test failures.
Once you believe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #16 from markusN ---
Problem of `pgpointcloudtest` addressed, it now compile successfully:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44944553
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #15 from markusN ---
Created attachment 1691769
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1691769=edit
updated PDAL spec file
Successfully compiling
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #14 from markusN ---
Created attachment 1691596
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1691596=edit
updated PDAL spec file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #13 from markusN ---
I have modified the BRs as follows:
--- /home/mneteler/rpmbuild/SPECS/PDAL.spec 2020-05-24 19:16:26.794094506
+0200
+++ PDAL.spec 2020-05-24 18:50:52.810157029 +0200
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
BuildRequires:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #12 from Sandro Mani ---
Adding BR: /usr/bin/gdalinfo will solve the second one, the first one might be
solved by adding BR: postgresql-server.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #11 from markusN ---
Here the link to the scratch built with the respective root.log:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=44897107
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #10 from markusN ---
Concerning the soname issue, I have asked in the PDAL ticket about the timeline
of the next release including the fix.
Next I have redone a scratch built, which fails in 2 tests:
98% tests passed, 2 tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #9 from Sandro Mani ---
> This had been fixed upstream and will be part of the next PDAL release:
> https://github.com/PDAL/PDAL/pull/3042
Wonder if it makes sense to package the latest git snapshot of the
2.1-maintenance branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #7 from Sandro Mani ---
Created attachment 1691395
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1691395=edit
PDAL_unbundle.patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #8 from Sandro Mani ---
Yes, sure, had forgotten to do so
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #6 from Sandro Mani ---
Created attachment 1691394
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1691394=edit
PDAL_tests.patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #5 from markusN ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #4)
> Created attachment 1691203 [details]
> PDAL.spec
>
> Attached a spec with some fixes:
>
> - Correctly unbundle eigen3 and gtest
> - Correctly build and run tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #4 from Sandro Mani ---
Created attachment 1691203
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1691203=edit
PDAL.spec
Attached a spec with some fixes:
- Correctly unbundle eigen3 and gtest
- Correctly build and run tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
--- Comment #3 from markusN ---
Thanks so much for your detailed review.
I have addressed most of it but struggle with a few points (since I am not much
of an expert here):
> => %{_libdir}/libpdal_plugin* look like pdal plugins, which are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
markusN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1
55 matches
Mail list logo
