https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-73aa80896b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-73aa80896b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-73aa80896b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-73aa80896b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/binaryen
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #10 from Andy Mender ---
No, sorry, forgot to approve!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #9 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #8)
> Other than that, the package looks good already.
Is there anything else apart from the visual formatting?
Do you want me to post another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #8 from Andy Mender ---
> It's not mandatory, but I can reformat if you think it makes a difference.
It would improve maintainability. Appreciated!
> Indeed they do. This is
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #6)
> > There are spaces after each semi-colon. I'm not sure what needs fixing here.
>
> I meant splitting the initial tags into blocks and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #6 from Andy Mender ---
> There are spaces after each semi-colon. I'm not sure what needs fixing here.
I meant splitting the initial tags into blocks and tabulating the visually into
columns (with spaces) like this:
Name:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/binaryen/binaryen.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/binaryen/binaryen-95-3.fc33.src.rpm
- fix build on F31/F32
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/binaryen/binaryen.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/binaryen/binaryen-95-2.fc33.src.rpm
- use built binaries in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #2)
> Package builds cleanly in a Fedora 33/Rawhide x86_64 local mock environment,
> but fails via `fedora-review` (possibly related to recent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #2 from Andy Mender ---
Package builds cleanly in a Fedora 33/Rawhide x86_64 local mock environment,
but fails via `fedora-review` (possibly related to recent annobin issues).
However, it fails in COPR for Fedora 31 and 32:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andymenderu...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a
22 matches
Mail list logo
