Re: [PacketFence-users] No association between user and IP (or MAC) in logs

Also, while looking at the code, I put the logging statement in "pf::node::node_register", so now (with your suggested change, in "captiveportal::PacketFence::Controller::CaptivePortal::webNodeRegister") I have 2 logs for the same thing. Which one is better? Would the node.pm -> node_register

[PacketFence-users] Internet Explorer web admin access

I'm getting trouble accessing the web admin interface when using IE11. This seems to be ok using PacketFence version 5.1, but not 5.3.1 or 5.4.0. Login access is ok, but the nodes and users tabs just sit there with the 3 dots just flashing as if the browser is waiting. The search box doesn't

[PacketFence-users] Captive portal access denied

I am attempting  to set up packetfence for wifi web auth. The problem i am having is that when the user gets re directed i get page canot be displayed. If i try to go to the link i get access denied.  Portal 192.168.14.2Management  192.168.8.6 Thank you in advance. Sent from my Sprint Samsung

Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener

Could'nt you obtain the required behaviour specifying the IP of the DHCP server in the corresponding box in Configuration->General? Nicola Il 14/10/15 09:15, Chinmay Mahata ha scritto: Dear Derek, Thanks a lot for your response. Please do let me know when you get something for my issue.

[PacketFence-users] AD users not authenticating through portal

Hi, Probably a bit of a 'noob' question but I'm trying to find out why my AD users are not authenticating through the web portal. I have a domain / realm sorted, and sources are configured and test works on them, but when I input a username and password it comes up with "Invalid login or

[PacketFence-users] Using Multiple SNAT Interfaces Problem

Hello all, So... I see where PacketFence has the option to specify that there are multiple SNAT interfaces, but I've not found where/all to specify which one to use... Here's what I want to do. Within an Inline environment, I want to specify that VLAN 15 (ex. eth0.15) reaches the Internet via

[PacketFence-users] Suricata alerts to Packet Fence (Derek Wuelfrath)

Hi Derek, on your last suggestion I basically replaced syslogd on freebsd with syslog-ng so as to more easily mimic your instructions: You had suggested some syslog-ng config changes. I put them verbatim right in the bottom of the cfg file without modifying anything else. Seemed like the easiest

Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener

Nicola, > Could'nt you obtain the required behaviour specifying the IP of the DHCP > server in the corresponding box in Configuration->General? That is not related. What Chinmay is asking is basically that PacketFence to stop listening for DHCP packet (pfdhcplistener) on management interface

Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

That’s got it, thanks. I just needed the following line: All seems to be working perfectly now. Thanks very much. From: Derek Wuelfrath [mailto:dwuelfr...@inverse.ca] Sent: 13 October 2015 19:45 To: ML PF Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the

Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener

Dear Derek, Thanks a lot for your response. Please do let me know when you get something for my issue. Regards, --Chinmay From: Derek Wuelfrath dwuelfr...@inverse.ca Sent: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:23:57 To: ML PF packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users]

[PacketFence-users] No association between user and IP (or MAC) in logs

Hello. Since I updated from 4.1 to 4.7, I cannot find anymore in the logs the line > performing node registration ... > register.cgi(0) INFO: performing node registration MAC: > XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX pid: (pf::web::_sanitize_and_register) which I used to associate user to its activity (in case

Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

Excellent! Cheers! dw. — Derek Wuelfrath dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110) Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org) > On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:51 AM, Morris, Andi wrote: > > That’s

Re: [PacketFence-users] No association between user and IP (or MAC) in logs

Hello Nicola, > Since I updated from 4.1 to 4.7 You know that we released 5.4 last week right ? ;) >> performing node registration ... > >> register.cgi(0) INFO: performing node registration MAC: >> XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX pid: (pf::web::_sanitize_and_register) > > which I used to associate

Re: [PacketFence-users] Nessus scan

hello, ok I will apply patch Thanks Fabrice I have a doubt. I read in the PF administration guide that there is a problem with module Net :: Nessus :: XMLRPC this module already comes installed with the PF? or must be installed? I think that's why the PF can not call the nessus to scan the

Re: [PacketFence-users] Using Multiple SNAT Interfaces Problem

Hello Joshua, you will need to configure iproute2 to do that. http://www.lartc.org/howto/ regards Fabrice Le 2015-10-14 05:08, Nathan, Josh a écrit : > Hello all, > > So... I see where PacketFence has the option to specify that there are > multiple SNAT interfaces, but I've not found

Re: [PacketFence-users] No association between user and IP (or MAC) in logs

Thank you, but I noticed there is not a "custom.pm" for CaptivePortal. Isn't there a more update-resistant way? Nicola Il 14/10/15 15:33, Derek Wuelfrath ha scritto: > Hello Nicola, > >> Since I updated from 4.1 to 4.7 > You know that we released 5.4 last week right ? ;) > >>> performing node