Re: [PacketFence-users] authentication / administration classes

Looking like this: > > What do you have in /usr/local/fingerbank/logs/fingerbank.log? > Feb 11 10:43:08 pfqueue(19418) INFO: [mac:2c:41:38:91:62:6f] Found > combination ID '762488' in schema 'Upstream' > (fingerbank::Source::LocalDB::_getCombinationID) > Feb 11 10:43:08 pfqueue(19415) INFO:

Re: [PacketFence-users] On pf 4.6, what to restart after config file change ?

Hi Louis! I'll try that, but I suppose I will also have to restart radiusd, else the auth-request from the new switches will be refused Cheers, - Mail original - > De: "Louis Munro" > À: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Envoyé: Mercredi 10 Février 2016

Re: [PacketFence-users] On pf 4.6, what to restart after config file change ?

> On Feb 11, 2016, at 4:36 , Frederic Hermann wrote: > > > Hi Louis! > > I'll try that, but I suppose I will also have to restart radiusd, else the > auth-request from the new switches will be refused > You should not have to. What would be the point of

Re: [PacketFence-users] machine authentication

Hello Reeyon, under wireless do you have machine and user auth ? Also it should work but you can change the connection_type filter by a ssid filter. Something like that: [ssidsecure] filter = ssid operator = is value = ssidsecure Regards Fabrice Le 2016-02-10 23:33, Reeyon Lim a écrit : >

Re: [PacketFence-users] authentication / administration classes

> On Feb 11, 2016, at 4:45 , mj wrote: > > > Not sure if "unable to fullfil" is fingerbank-speak for: "your search > generated no results"? Not really. It means we did not get an “exact” match in the local db, so we query the API for which you have a key. That’s what

[PacketFence-users] accounting errors flooding radius.log

Hello, I've just upgraded from 4.7 to 5.6.1 and worked through all the upgrade doc, fixed all my violation syntax, upgraded the db schema incrementally from 4.7 to 5.0 to 5.1 to 5.2 blah blah all the way to 5.6, added the db credentials to pfconf.conf, and generally gotten the thing working

Re: [PacketFence-users] machine authentication

Hello Reeyon, really happy that it's working for you. In my opinion it's better to use the ssid because it's more specific than the connection_type (in the case of multiples ssid), but do as you want. Regards Fabrice Le 2016-02-11 21:30, Reeyon Lim a écrit : Hello Fabrice, It is perfect

Re: [PacketFence-users] machine authentication

Hello Fabrice, It is perfect now :-) Just realized that supplicant's server CA was causing the problem. Btw, still stick with connection_type filter Wireless-802.11-EAP and it is working. Thank you. Regards, Reeyon On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Fabrice DURAND wrote: >