Re: [PacketFence-users] No association between user and IP (or MAC) in logs

2015-10-14 Thread Nicola Canepa 
Also, while looking at the code, I put the logging statement in 
"pf::node::node_register", so now (with your suggested change, in 
"captiveportal::PacketFence::Controller::CaptivePortal::webNodeRegister") I 
have 2 logs for the same thing.
Which one is better?
Would the node.pm -> node_register change also affect differenti types 
of logins (maybe via WPA2 auth or similar?)

In the meanwhile, thank you for the prompt solution.

Nicola

Il 14/10/15 15:48, Nicola Canepa ha scritto:
> Thank you, but I noticed there is not a "custom.pm" for CaptivePortal.
> Isn't there a more update-resistant way?
>
> Nicola
>
> Il 14/10/15 15:33, Derek Wuelfrath ha scritto:
>> Hello Nicola,
>>
>>> Since I updated from 4.1 to 4.7
>> You know that we released 5.4 last week right ? ;)
>>
 performing node registration ...
 register.cgi(0) INFO: performing node registration MAC:
 XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX pid:  (pf::web::_sanitize_and_register)
>>> which I used to associate user to its activity (in case of need).
>>> Is it possible to have this restored by configuring logs somewhere?
>> That was part of the old captive portal mechanisms (CGI). This code 
>> have been removed.
>> To cover the case you want (a node registers through the 
>> captive-portal), you may want to add a logging statement to the 
>> “WebNodeRegister” method in 
>> /usr/local/pf/html/captive-portal/lib/captive-portal/PacketFence/Controller/CaptivePortal.pm
>>
>> Cheers!
>> dw.
>>
>> —
>> Derek Wuelfrath
>> dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 
>> (x110)
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>> (www.packetfence.org)
>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:55 AM, Nicola Canepa  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>> Since I updated from 4.1 to 4.7, I cannot find anymore in the logs 
>>> the line
 performing node registration ...
 register.cgi(0) INFO: performing node registration MAC:
 XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX pid:  (pf::web::_sanitize_and_register)
>>> which I used to associate user to its activity (in case of need).
>>> Is it possible to have this restored by configuring logs somewhere?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> Nicola Canepa
>>> Tel: +39-0522-399-3474
>>> canep...@mmfg.it
>>> ---
>>> Il contenuto della presente comunicazione è riservato e destinato 
>>> esclusivamente ai destinatari indicati. Nel caso in cui sia ricevuto 
>>> da persona diversa dal destinatario sono proibite la diffusione, la 
>>> distribuzione e la copia. Nel caso riceveste la presente per errore, 
>>> Vi preghiamo di informarci e di distruggerlo e/o cancellarlo dal 
>>> Vostro computer, senza utilizzare i dati contenuti. La presente 
>>> comunicazione (comprensiva dei documenti allegati) non avrà valore 
>>> di proposta contrattuale e/o accettazione di proposte provenienti 
>>> dal destinatario, nè rinuncia o riconoscimento di diritti, debiti 
>>> e/o crediti, nè sarà impegnativa, qualora non sia sottoscritto 
>>> successivo accordo da chi può validamente obbligarci. Non deriverà 
>>> alcuna responsabilità precontrattuale a ns. carico, se la presente 
>>> non sia seguita da contratto sottoscritto dalle parti.
>>>
>>> The content of the above communication is strictly confidential and 
>>> reserved solely for the referred addressees. In the event of receipt 
>>> by persons different from the addressee, copying, alteration and 
>>> distribution are forbidden. If received by mistake we ask you to 
>>> inform us and to destroy and/or delete from your computer without 
>>> using the data herein contained. The present message (eventual 
>>> annexes inclusive) shall not be considered a contractual proposal 
>>> and/or acceptance of offer from the addressee, nor waiver 
>>> recognizance of rights, debts  and/or credits, nor shall it be 
>>> binding when not executed as a subsequent agreement by persons who 
>>> could lawfully represent us. No pre-contractual liability shall 
>>> apply to us when the present communication is not followed by any 
>>> binding agreement between the parties.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>  
>>>
>>> ___
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>> --
>>  
>>
>> ___
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>

-- 

Nicola Canepa
Tel: +39-0522-399-3474
canep...@mmfg.it
---
Il contenuto della presente comunicazione è riservato e destinato 
esclusivamente ai destinatari indicati. Nel caso in cui sia ricevuto da persona 
diversa dal destinatario sono proibite la diffusione, la distribuzione e la 
copia. Nel caso riceveste la presente per errore, Vi preghiamo di

[PacketFence-users] Internet Explorer web admin access

2015-10-14 Thread Morris, Andi 
I'm getting trouble accessing the web admin interface when using IE11. This 
seems to be ok using PacketFence version 5.1, but not 5.3.1 or 5.4.0. Login 
access is ok, but the nodes and users tabs just sit there with the 3 dots just 
flashing as if the browser is waiting. The search box doesn't render properly 
either.

All other browsers seem to be ok.

I'm happy using Chrome, but we're trying to push a guest user registration form 
to staff, and a lot of them will have the default browser of IE11 unfortunately.

Happy to send screenshots if it helps.

Cheers,
Andi

-
Andi Morris
IT Security Officer
Cardiff Metropolitan University
T: 02920 205720
E: amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk
--



[Cardiff Metropolitan University - 150 years of nurturing 
talent]
--
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

[PacketFence-users] Captive portal access denied

2015-10-14 Thread morenomoises 

I am attempting  to set up packetfence for wifi web auth. The problem i am 
having is that when the user gets re directed i get page canot be displayed. If 
i try to go to the link i get access denied. 
Portal 192.168.14.2Management  192.168.8.6
Thank you in advance.

Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note5.--
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener

2015-10-14 Thread Nicola Canepa 
Could'nt you obtain the required behaviour specifying the IP of the DHCP 
server in the corresponding box in Configuration->General?


Nicola

Il 14/10/15 09:15, Chinmay Mahata ha scritto:

Dear Derek,
   Thanks a lot for your response.
Please do let me know when you get something for my issue.

Regards,
--Chinmay



From: Derek Wuelfrath 
Sent: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:23:57
To: ML PF 
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener
Hello Chinmay,

I’m looking at it and I’ll get back to you.

Cheers!
dw.

—
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.491 
http://1.514.447.491=0=0=0=ba42cf6a7cd18481ec5520d40f0207840b977b09>8 
(x110) :: +1.866.353.615 
http://1.866.353.615=0=0=0=af879f62ee1a7599566197d6e2221d8167f40afc>3 
(x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu ) 
and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org )


On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:17 AM, Chinmay Mahata 
 wrote:


Dear Derek,
Any thought on my issue.

Regards,
--Chinmay



From: "Chinmay Mahata" 
Sent: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 18:13:36
To: "packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net" 


Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener
Dear Derek,
 Thanks for your quick response.   I think I could not describe 
my problem/query properly.


DHCPD is running on only one interface (eth0) of my PF server, no 
issue with that.


Actually at the WAN side (upstream) of my PF server there is another 
DHCP server is running (though PF server WAN has static IP). Since 
pfdhcplistener is running at eth1(WAN) also, in the node (web)page I 
can see many unregistered nodes of WAN network which I don't want.


I want to see only those nodes in the webpage which are under PF 
server and who are getting IP addresses from DHCP server running in 
PF server (on eth0). Hope pfdhcplistener on eth0 only can catch those.


So I want to run only one instance of pfdhcplistener on interface 
eth0 (pfdhcplistener_eth0). Please let me know how can I do that.


Thanks again Derek.

Regards,
--Chinmay





From: Derek Wuelfrath 
Sent: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 22:11:09
To: ML PF 
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener
Chinmay,


The packetfence server is working as a DHCP server.
I see that two pfdhcplisteners are running: *pfdhcplistener_eth0*, 
*pfdhcplistener_eth1*.



But I want to run only one pfdhcplistener viz. 
*pfdhcplistener_eth0*. Can it be possible (or it may cause other 
problem)? Which config item do I need to modify for that?


‘pfdhcplistener’, as its name says, listen for dhcp packets.
PacketFence starts a ‘pfdhcplistener’ daemon on each of the required 
network interfaces (in this case, management and inline).


‘pfdhcplistener’ is not acting as a DHCP server, dhcpd is. 
‘pfdhcplistener’ is only listening to DHCP packet for MAC <-> IP 
association useful in PacketFence.


If you do a
ps uafx | grep dhcpd
you should see the dhcpd daemon running with only eth0 as listening 
interface.


Cheers!
dw.

—
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.491 
http://1.514.447.491=0=0=0=ba42cf6a7cd18481ec5520d40f0207840b977b09>8 
(x110) :: +1.866.353.615 
http://1.866.353.615=0=0=0=af879f62ee1a7599566197d6e2221d8167f40afc>3 
(x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu 
) and PacketFence (www.packetfence.org 
)


On Oct 8, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Chinmay Mahata 
 wrote:


Hi,
I have setup packetfence(5.4.0) with inline enforcement having 
below interface details (LAN: eth0, WAN: eth1).


[interface eth0]
enforcement=inlinel2
type=internal

[interface eth1]
type=management

The packetfence server is working as a DHCP server.
I see that two pfdhcplisteners are running: *pfdhcplistener_eth0*, 
*pfdhcplistener_eth1*.



But I want to run only one pfdhcplistener viz. 
*pfdhcplistener_eth0*. Can it be possible (or it may cause other 
problem)? Which config item do I need to modify for that?


Waiting for your help.

Thanks in advance.
--Chinmay


Get your own *FREE* website, *FREE* domain & *FREE* mobile app with 
Company email. 

*Know More >* 
--

___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users 



--
___
PacketFence-users mailing list

[PacketFence-users] AD users not authenticating through portal

2015-10-14 Thread Morgan, Darren 
Hi,

Probably a bit of a 'noob' question but I'm trying to find out why my AD users 
are not authenticating through the web portal.  I have a domain / realm sorted, 
and sources are configured and test works on them, but when I input a username 
and password it comes up with "Invalid login or password"

If I log in with the PacketFence admin password I get " Sorry   You do not have 
the permission to register a device with this username"

Can someone point me in the right direction to diagnose this issue.  i.e. which 
logs can I look in (and where will they be?)

Using latest version (5.4.o) and all services running.

Regards

Darren Morgan
Systems Manager
Oundle School
Tel: 01832 277349
? Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail


This email is sent from either Oundle School or Laxton Junior School for The 
Corporation of Oundle School and is intended only for the addressee named 
above.  The Corporation of Oundle School is a Charity incorporated under Royal 
Charter RC000396 and charity number 309921.  www.oundleschool.org.uk
 Scanned by iCritical.

--
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

[PacketFence-users] Using Multiple SNAT Interfaces Problem

2015-10-14 Thread Nathan, Josh 
Hello all,

So... I see where PacketFence has the option to specify that there are
multiple SNAT interfaces, but I've not found where/all to specify which one
to use... Here's what I want to do.

Within an Inline environment, I want to specify that VLAN 15 (ex. eth0.15)
reaches the Internet via eth1, and VLAN 16 (eth0.16) reaches the Internet
via eth2. Is there a built-in way for PacketFence to do that? In the
networks.conf file I see the NATing enabled or disabled option, but I
haven't see where I can flag different internal interfaces to use different
SNAT interfaces.

Thanks,
Joshua Nathan
IT Administrator
Black Forest Academy
+49 (0) 7626-9161-630
--
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

[PacketFence-users] Suricata alerts to Packet Fence (Derek Wuelfrath)

2015-10-14 Thread Boley, Chris 
Hi Derek, on your last suggestion I basically replaced syslogd on freebsd with 
syslog-ng so as to more easily mimic your instructions:
You had suggested some syslog-ng config changes.
I put them verbatim right in the bottom of the cfg file without modifying 
anything else. Seemed like the easiest route to take.

filter f_suricata { match('suricata:' value("MSGHDR")); };
destination d_suricata { tcp("192.168.5.10"); };
log { source(src); filter(f_suricata); destination(d_suricata); };

On the middle (destination) line, should that be UDP and not TCP? Syslog is 
typically UDP 514. Otherwise it looks like the desired effect is happening.

A quick netstat shows:

root@suricata:/usr/ports/sysutils/syslog-ng # netstat
Active Internet connections
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address  Foreign Address(state)
tcp4   0  0 192.168.5.249.25801192.168.5.10.shell SYN_SENT


Thanks.
Chris Boley




















-Original Message-
From: packetfence-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net 
[mailto:packetfence-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 10:53 AM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: PacketFence-users Digest, Vol 90, Issue 36

Send PacketFence-users mailing list submissions to
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
packetfence-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
packetfence-users-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of PacketFence-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Suricata alerts to Packet Fence (Derek Wuelfrath)
   2. Re: pfdhcplistener (Derek Wuelfrath)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:41:05 -0400
From: Derek Wuelfrath 
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Suricata alerts to Packet Fence
To: ML PF 
Message-ID: <6c92c7d1-0d78-42df-be14-410dc28c8...@inverse.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hello Chris,

Are you running Suricata on a separate box (I assume). Are you running it 
standalone or withing a security suite (SecurityOnion per example).

Let me know

Cheers!
dw.

?
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110) 
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Boley, Chris  wrote:
> 
> Does anyone happen to know where I can find info on sending suricata alert 
> events over to Packet Fence?
>  
>  
> Chris Boley | Network Engineer | Cogentrix Energy Power Management, 
> LLC
> 
>  
> --
>  ___
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
> 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users 
> 
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:52:22 -0400
From: Derek Wuelfrath 
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener
To: ML PF 
Message-ID: <79229123-87df-4f2f-83ab-3231b5525...@inverse.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hello Chinmay,

I?m looking at it and I?ll get back to you.

Cheers!
dw.

?
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110) 
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:17 AM, Chinmay Mahata  
> wrote:
> 
> Dear Derek,
> Any thought on my issue.
> 
> Regards,
> --Chinmay
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Chinmay Mahata" 
> Sent: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 18:13:36
> To: "packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net" 
> 
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener Dear Derek,
>  Thanks for your quick response.   I think I could not describe my 
> problem/query properly.
> 
> DHCPD is running on only one interface (eth0) of my PF server, no issue with 
> that.
> 
> Actually at the WAN side (upstream) of my PF server there is another DHCP 
> server is running (though PF server WAN has static IP). Since pfdhcplistener 
> is running at eth1(WAN) also, in the node (web)page I can see many 
> unregistered nodes of WAN network which I don't want.
> 
> I want to see only those nodes in the webpage which are under PF server 
> and who

Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener

2015-10-14 Thread Derek Wuelfrath 
Nicola,

> Could'nt you obtain the required behaviour specifying the IP of the DHCP 
> server in the corresponding box in Configuration->General?

That is not related.

What Chinmay is asking is basically that PacketFence to stop listening for DHCP 
packet (pfdhcplistener) on management interface to avoid node table getting 
populated by nodes outside of the PacketFence inline network.

Cheers!
dw.

—
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

> On Oct 14, 2015, at 11:15 AM, Nicola Canepa  wrote:
> 
> Could'nt you obtain the required behaviour specifying the IP of the DHCP 
> server in the corresponding box in Configuration->General?
> 
> Nicola
> 
> Il 14/10/15 09:15, Chinmay Mahata ha scritto:
>> Dear Derek,
>>Thanks a lot for your response. 
>> Please do let me know when you get something for my issue.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> --Chinmay
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Derek Wuelfrath  
>> Sent: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:23:57 
>> To: ML PF  
>> 
>> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener
>> Hello Chinmay,
>> 
>> I’m looking at it and I’ll get back to you.
>> 
>> Cheers!
>> dw.
>> 
>> —
>> Derek Wuelfrath
>> dwuelfr...@inverse.ca  :: +1.514.447.491 
>> http://1.514.447.491=0=0=0=ba42cf6a7cd18481ec5520d40f0207840b977b09>8
>>  (x110) :: +1.866.353.615 
>> http://1.866.353.615=0=0=0=af879f62ee1a7599566197d6e2221d8167f40afc>3
>>  (x110)
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu ) and 
>> PacketFence (www.packetfence.org )
>> 
>>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:17 AM, Chinmay Mahata  
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Derek,
>>> Any thought on my issue.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> --Chinmay
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: "Chinmay Mahata"  
>>> 
>>> Sent: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 18:13:36 
>>> To: "packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net" 
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener
>>> Dear Derek,
>>>  Thanks for your quick response.   I think I could not describe my 
>>> problem/query properly.
>>> 
>>> DHCPD is running on only one interface (eth0) of my PF server, no issue 
>>> with that.
>>> 
>>> Actually at the WAN side (upstream) of my PF server there is another DHCP 
>>> server is running (though PF server WAN has static IP). Since 
>>> pfdhcplistener is running at eth1(WAN) also, in the node (web)page I can 
>>> see many unregistered nodes of WAN network which I don't want.
>>> 
>>> I want to see only those nodes in the webpage which are under PF server 
>>> and who are getting IP addresses from DHCP server running in PF server (on 
>>> eth0). Hope pfdhcplistener on eth0 only can catch those. 
>>> 
>>> So I want to run only one instance of pfdhcplistener on interface eth0 
>>> (pfdhcplistener_eth0). Please let me know how can I do that.
>>> 
>>> Thanks again Derek.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> --Chinmay
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: Derek Wuelfrath  
>>> Sent: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 22:11:09 
>>> To: ML PF  
>>> 
>>> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener
>>> Chinmay,
>>> 
 The packetfence server is working as a DHCP server.
 I see that two pfdhcplisteners are running: pfdhcplistener_eth0, 
 pfdhcplistener_eth1.
 
 
 But I want to run only one pfdhcplistener viz. pfdhcplistener_eth0. Can it 
 be possible (or it may cause other problem)? Which config item do I need 
 to modify for that?
>>> 
>>> ‘pfdhcplistener’, as its name says, listen for dhcp packets.
>>> PacketFence starts a ‘pfdhcplistener’ daemon on each of the required 
>>> network interfaces (in this case, management and inline).
>>> 
>>> ‘pfdhcplistener’ is not acting as a DHCP server, dhcpd is. ‘pfdhcplistener’ 
>>> is only listening to DHCP packet for MAC <-> IP association useful in 
>>> PacketFence.
>>> 
>>> If you do a 
>>> ps uafx | grep dhcpd
>>> you should see the dhcpd daemon running with only eth0 as listening 
>>> interface.
>>> 
>>> Cheers!
>>> dw.
>>> 
>>> —
>>> Derek Wuelfrath
>>> dwuelfr...@inverse.ca  :: +1.514.447.491 
>>> http://1.514.447.491=0=0=0=ba42cf6a7cd18481ec5520d40f0207840b977b09>8
>>>  (x110) :: +1.866.353.615 
>>> http://1.866.353.615=0=0=0=af879f62ee1a7599566197d6e2221d8167f40afc>3
>>>  (x110)
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (

Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

2015-10-14 Thread Morris, Andi 
That’s got it, thanks. I just needed the following line:


All seems to be working perfectly now. Thanks very much.


From: Derek Wuelfrath [mailto:dwuelfr...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 13 October 2015 19:45
To: ML PF 
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

Andi,

What is the “expiration” action type ?

Can you send me the whole file so I see what you are trying to do.

If you try to hide the “registration window” section use the followings:




For the “actions” section, the followings:







Cheers!
dw.

—
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) 
:: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)

On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Morris, Andi 
> wrote:

Thanks Derek,
That’s been a really big help and I’m nearly there. What is the format for the 
date field? I’ve tried the following, but I get errors:




The errors I get when creating a user are:
Error! Expiration field is required
Error! ‘expiration’ is not a valid value

The values for dates I’ve tried are:
“-mm-dd”
“/mm/dd”
“-mm-dd hh:mm”
“/mm/dd hh:mm”

Cheers,
Andi


From: Derek Wuelfrath [mailto:dwuelfr...@inverse.ca]
Sent: 08 October 2015 18:00
To: ML PF 
>
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

I’ll keep looking for ways to give the users a default unreg date.

Here’s how I usually do it:




Cheers!
dw.

—
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) 
:: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)

On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Morris, Andi 
> wrote:

Aha, I found the Actions array in /lib/pf/Authentication/constants.pm and 
changed the order. That means that the Actions now shows ‘Set access duration’ 
by default on the create screen, perfect.

I’ll keep looking for ways to give the users a default unreg date.

Cheers,
Andi

From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk]
Sent: 08 October 2015 16:32
To: 
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

Thanks Derek,
I can see how that would work for a simple field such as Name, but I can’t work 
it out for the unregistration date.

  77   
   78 [% l('Registration 
Window') %]
   79 
   80   [% form.field('valid_from').render_element | none %] 
   81   [% form.field('expiration').render_element | none %]
   82 
   83   


I still need to swap access duration for the set role action too.


   85   

   86 [% l('Actions') %]

   87 

   88   

   89 

   90   [% FOREACH action IN form.field('actions').fields -%]

   91

Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener

2015-10-14 Thread Chinmay Mahata 
Dear Derek,
 Thanks a lot for your response. 
Please do let me know when you get something for my issue.

Regards,
--Chinmay



From: Derek Wuelfrath dwuelfr...@inverse.ca
Sent: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:23:57 
To: ML PF packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener
  Hello Chinmay,I’m looking at it and I’ll get back to you.
Cheers!dw.—Derek wuelfrathdwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: 
+1.866.353.6153 (x110)Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)


On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:17 AM, Chinmay Mahata 
chinmay_mah...@rediffmail.com wrote:Dear Derek, Any 
thought on my issue.Regards,--ChinmayFrom: "Chinmay  Mahata" 
chinmay_mah...@rediffmail.comSent: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 18:13:36 To: 
"packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net" 
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re: [PacketFence-users] 
pfdhcplistenerDear Derek, Thanks for your quick 
response. I think I could not describe my problem/query 
properly.DHCPD is running on only one interface (eth0) of my PF server, no 
issue with that.Actually at the WAN side (upstream) of my PF server there is 
another DHCP server is running (though PF server WAN has static IP). Since 
pfdhcplistener is running at eth1(WAN) also, in the node (web)page I can see 
many unregistered nodes of WAN network which I don't want. I 
want to see only those nodes in the webpage which are under PF server and who 
are getting IP 
 addresses from DHCP server running in PF server (on eth0). Hope pfdhcplistener 
on eth0 only can catch those. So I want to run only one instance of 
pfdhcplistener on interface eth0 (pfdhcplistener_eth0). Please let me know how 
can I do that.Thanks again Derek.Regards,--Chinmay  From: Derek 
Wuelfrath dwuelfr...@inverse.caSent: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 22:11:09 To: ML 
PF packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re: 
[PacketFence-users] pfdhcplistener  Chinmay,The packetfence server is working 
as a DHCP server.I see that two pfdhcplisteners are 
running:pfdhcplistener_eth0,pfdhcplistener_eth1.But I want to run 
only one pfdhcplistener viz.pfdhcplistener_eth0. Can it be possible (or 
it may cause other problem)? Which config item do I need to modify for 
that?‘pfdhcplistener’, as its name says, listen for dhcp packets.PacketFence 
starts a ‘pfdhcplistener’ daemon on each of the required network interfaces (in 
this case, management and inline
 ).‘pfdhcplistener’ is not acting as a DHCP server, dhcpd is. ‘pfdhcplistener’ 
is only listening to DHCP packet for MAC - IP association useful in 
PacketFence.If you do aps uafx | grep dhcpdyou should see the dhcpd 
daemon running with only eth0 as listening interface.
Cheers!dw.—Derek wuelfrathdwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: 
+1.866.353.6153 (x110)Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)


On Oct 8, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Chinmay Mahata 
chinmay_mah...@rediffmail.com wrote:Hi,  I have setup 
packetfence(5.4.0) with inline enforcement having below interface details (LAN: 
eth0, WAN: eth1).[interface eth0]enforcement=inlinel2type=internal[interface 
eth1]type=managementThe packetfence server is working as a DHCP server.I see 
that two pfdhcplisteners are running: pfdhcplistener_eth0, 
pfdhcplistener_eth1.But I want to run only one pfdhcplistener viz. 
pfdhcplistener_eth0. Can it be possible (or it may cause other problem)? Which 
config item do I need to modify for that?Waiting for your help.Thanks in 
advance.--Chinmay
--
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
--
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

[PacketFence-users] No association between user and IP (or MAC) in logs

2015-10-14 Thread Nicola Canepa 
Hello.
Since I updated from 4.1 to 4.7, I cannot find anymore in the logs the line
> performing node registration ...

> register.cgi(0) INFO: performing node registration MAC: 
> XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX pid:  (pf::web::_sanitize_and_register)

which I used to associate user to its activity (in case of need).
Is it possible to have this restored by configuring logs somewhere?

Thank you

-- 

Nicola Canepa
Tel: +39-0522-399-3474
canep...@mmfg.it
---
Il contenuto della presente comunicazione è riservato e destinato 
esclusivamente ai destinatari indicati. Nel caso in cui sia ricevuto da persona 
diversa dal destinatario sono proibite la diffusione, la distribuzione e la 
copia. Nel caso riceveste la presente per errore, Vi preghiamo di informarci e 
di distruggerlo e/o cancellarlo dal Vostro computer, senza utilizzare i dati 
contenuti. La presente comunicazione (comprensiva dei documenti allegati) non 
avrà valore di proposta contrattuale e/o accettazione di proposte provenienti 
dal destinatario, nè rinuncia o riconoscimento di diritti, debiti e/o crediti, 
nè sarà impegnativa, qualora non sia sottoscritto successivo accordo da chi può 
validamente obbligarci. Non deriverà alcuna responsabilità precontrattuale a 
ns. carico, se la presente non sia seguita da contratto sottoscritto dalle 
parti.

The content of the above communication is strictly confidential and reserved 
solely for the referred addressees. In the event of receipt by persons 
different from the addressee, copying, alteration and distribution are 
forbidden. If received by mistake we ask you to inform us and to destroy and/or 
delete from your computer without using the data herein contained. The present 
message (eventual annexes inclusive) shall not be considered a contractual 
proposal and/or acceptance of offer from the addressee, nor waiver recognizance 
of rights, debts  and/or credits, nor shall it be binding when not executed as 
a subsequent agreement by persons who could lawfully represent us. No 
pre-contractual liability shall apply to us when the present communication is 
not followed by any binding agreement between the parties.


--
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page

2015-10-14 Thread Derek Wuelfrath 
Excellent!

Cheers!
dw.

—
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

> On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:51 AM, Morris, Andi  wrote:
> 
> That’s got it, thanks. I just needed the following line:
> 
>  
> All seems to be working perfectly now. Thanks very much.
>  
>  
> From: Derek Wuelfrath [mailto:dwuelfr...@inverse.ca] 
> Sent: 13 October 2015 19:45
> To: ML PF 
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page
>  
> Andi,
>  
> What is the “expiration” action type ?
>  
> Can you send me the whole file so I see what you are trying to do.
>  
> If you try to hide the “registration window” section use the followings:
>  
> 
> 
>  
> For the “actions” section, the followings:
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers!
> dw.
>  
> —
> Derek Wuelfrath
> dwuelfr...@inverse.ca  :: +1.514.447.4918 
> (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu ) and 
> PacketFence (www.packetfence.org )
>  
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Morris, Andi  > wrote:
>  
> Thanks Derek,
> That’s been a really big help and I’m nearly there. What is the format for 
> the date field? I’ve tried the following, but I get errors:
>  
> 
> 
>  
> The errors I get when creating a user are:
> Error! Expiration field is required
> Error! ‘expiration’ is not a valid value
>  
> The values for dates I’ve tried are:
> “-mm-dd”
> “/mm/dd”
> “-mm-dd hh:mm”
> “/mm/dd hh:mm”
>  
> Cheers,
> Andi
>  
>  
> From: Derek Wuelfrath [mailto:dwuelfr...@inverse.ca 
> ] 
> Sent: 08 October 2015 18:00
> To: ML PF  >
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page
>  
> I’ll keep looking for ways to give the users a default unreg date.
>  
> Here’s how I usually do it:
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers!
> dw.
>  
> —
> Derek Wuelfrath
> dwuelfr...@inverse.ca  :: +1.514.447.4918 
> (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu ) and 
> PacketFence (www.packetfence.org )
>  
> On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Morris, Andi  > wrote:
>  
> Aha, I found the Actions array in /lib/pf/Authentication/constants.pm and 
> changed the order. That means that the Actions now shows ‘Set access 
> duration’ by default on the create screen, perfect.
>  
> I’ll keep looking for ways to give the users a default unreg date.
>  
> Cheers,
> Andi
>  
> From: Morris, Andi [mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk 
> ] 
> Sent: 08 October 2015 16:32
> To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
> 
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] tweaking the create users page
>  
> Thanks Derek,
> I can see how that would work for a simple field such as Name, but I can’t 
> work it out for the unregistration date.
>  
>   77   
>  <>   78 [% l('Registration 
> Window') %]
>  <>   79 
>  <>   80   [% form.field('valid_from').render_element | none %]  class="icon-arrow-right">
>  <>   81   [% form.field('expiration').render_element | none %]
>  <>   82 
>  <>   83   
>  
>  
> I still need to swap access duration for the set role action too.
>  
>85   
>  <>   86 [% l('Actions') %]
>  <>   87 
>  <>   88   
>  <>   89 
>  <>   90   [% FOREACH action IN form.field('actions').fields -%]
>  <>   91

Re: [PacketFence-users] No association between user and IP (or MAC) in logs

2015-10-14 Thread Derek Wuelfrath 
Hello Nicola,

> Since I updated from 4.1 to 4.7

You know that we released 5.4 last week right ? ;)

>> performing node registration ...
> 
>> register.cgi(0) INFO: performing node registration MAC: 
>> XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX pid:  (pf::web::_sanitize_and_register)
> 
> which I used to associate user to its activity (in case of need).
> Is it possible to have this restored by configuring logs somewhere?

That was part of the old captive portal mechanisms (CGI). This code have been 
removed.
To cover the case you want (a node registers through the captive-portal), you 
may want to add a logging statement to the “WebNodeRegister” method in 
/usr/local/pf/html/captive-portal/lib/captive-portal/PacketFence/Controller/CaptivePortal.pm

Cheers!
dw.

—
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

> On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:55 AM, Nicola Canepa  wrote:
> 
> Hello.
> Since I updated from 4.1 to 4.7, I cannot find anymore in the logs the line
>> performing node registration ...
> 
>> register.cgi(0) INFO: performing node registration MAC: 
>> XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX pid:  (pf::web::_sanitize_and_register)
> 
> which I used to associate user to its activity (in case of need).
> Is it possible to have this restored by configuring logs somewhere?
> 
> Thank you
> 
> -- 
> 
> Nicola Canepa
> Tel: +39-0522-399-3474
> canep...@mmfg.it
> ---
> Il contenuto della presente comunicazione è riservato e destinato 
> esclusivamente ai destinatari indicati. Nel caso in cui sia ricevuto da 
> persona diversa dal destinatario sono proibite la diffusione, la 
> distribuzione e la copia. Nel caso riceveste la presente per errore, Vi 
> preghiamo di informarci e di distruggerlo e/o cancellarlo dal Vostro 
> computer, senza utilizzare i dati contenuti. La presente comunicazione 
> (comprensiva dei documenti allegati) non avrà valore di proposta contrattuale 
> e/o accettazione di proposte provenienti dal destinatario, nè rinuncia o 
> riconoscimento di diritti, debiti e/o crediti, nè sarà impegnativa, qualora 
> non sia sottoscritto successivo accordo da chi può validamente obbligarci. 
> Non deriverà alcuna responsabilità precontrattuale a ns. carico, se la 
> presente non sia seguita da contratto sottoscritto dalle parti.
> 
> The content of the above communication is strictly confidential and reserved 
> solely for the referred addressees. In the event of receipt by persons 
> different from the addressee, copying, alteration and distribution are 
> forbidden. If received by mistake we ask you to inform us and to destroy 
> and/or delete from your computer without using the data herein contained. The 
> present message (eventual annexes inclusive) shall not be considered a 
> contractual proposal and/or acceptance of offer from the addressee, nor 
> waiver recognizance of rights, debts  and/or credits, nor shall it be binding 
> when not executed as a subsequent agreement by persons who could lawfully 
> represent us. No pre-contractual liability shall apply to us when the present 
> communication is not followed by any binding agreement between the parties.
> 
> 
> --
> ___
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Nessus scan

2015-10-14 Thread ismael flavio silva 
hello,

ok I will apply patch

Thanks Fabrice

I have a doubt.

I read in the PF administration guide that there is a problem with module Net 
:: Nessus :: XMLRPC

this module already comes installed with the PF? or must be installed?

I think that's why the PF can not call the nessus to scan the client.

sorry my bad english :)



Thanks


To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
From: fdur...@inverse.ca
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:38:53 -0400
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 5.40 pfsetvlan and snmptrapd BUG


  

  
  
Hello,



yes you need to apply the patch.



Regards

Fabrice





Le 2015-10-13 17:50, ismael flavio
  silva a écrit :



  
  hello,



ok.. works :)



thanks



I have a question...



I was using the PF 5.3.1 and wanted to use nessus to scan the
client



They said they needed a patch



on the PF 5.4.0 i need it?



here the patch:

https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/647.diff

 

So in /usr/local/pf/ do:

wget

https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/647.diff

 

patch -p1 --dry-run < 647.diff

patch -p1 < 647.diff

 

rpm -ivh

http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/RHEL6/devel/x86_64/RPMS/perl-Net-Nessus-REST-0.2-3.4.noarch.rpm

 

"Then restart packetfence , when it's done go in scan engine and
you will

see a new scan engine nessus6."



sorry my bad english :)



Thanks




  From: lmu...@inverse.ca

  Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 07:42:32 -0400

  To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net

  Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 5.40 pfsetvlan and
  snmptrapd BUG

  

  That bug is fixed in maintenance.
  

  
  Run 
  

  
  # perl /usr/local/pf/addons/pf-maint.pl
  

  
  

  
  Why are you starting those services?
  Unless you use port security you should not need them.
  


  
--
Louis
  Munro

  lmu...@inverse.ca
   ::  www.inverse.ca 

  +1.514.447.4918 x125  :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125

  Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)
  




  
On Oct 10, 2015, at 21:40 , ismael flavio silva
  
  wrote:


  
Hello
 
I am installing pf 5:40 to enforce
  vlan
 
when selected the pfsetvan and
  snmptrapd to start, it displays this error
 
packefence.log
 
ERROR: Failed to load module pf ::
  Switch :: packetfence: packetfence (mp :: ::
  SwitchFactory getModule)
 
ERROR: Can not load perl module
  switch is 127.0.0.1, type: packetfence. The type
  is unknown or perl module has compilation errors
  (please SwitchFactory :: :: _ ANON__)
 
pfcmd.pl (4740) FATAL: Can't call
  mothod "new" on an undefined value at
  /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/SwitchFactory.pm line 165
 
at the first start all ok. I deleted
  the switch´s default and added my swicth. Not work
  anymore :(
 
Thanks
  
  
--
  ___
  PacketFence-users mailing list
  PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
  



  
  

--

  ___
  PacketFence-users mailing list
  PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
  
  

  
  

  
--

Re: [PacketFence-users] Using Multiple SNAT Interfaces Problem

2015-10-14 Thread Fabrice DURAND 
Hello Joshua,

you will need to configure iproute2 to do that. http://www.lartc.org/howto/

regards
Fabrice



Le 2015-10-14 05:08, Nathan, Josh a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> So... I see where PacketFence has the option to specify that there are
> multiple SNAT interfaces, but I've not found where/all to specify
> which one to use... Here's what I want to do.
>
> Within an Inline environment, I want to specify that VLAN 15 (ex.
> eth0.15) reaches the Internet via eth1, and VLAN 16 (eth0.16) reaches
> the Internet via eth2. Is there a built-in way for PacketFence to do
> that? In the networks.conf file I see the NATing enabled or disabled
> option, but I haven't see where I can flag different internal
> interfaces to use different SNAT interfaces.
>
> Thanks,
> Joshua Nathan
> IT Administrator
> Black Forest Academy
> +49 (0) 7626-9161-630
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ___
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


-- 
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org) 



0xF78F957E.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
--
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] No association between user and IP (or MAC) in logs

2015-10-14 Thread Nicola Canepa 
Thank you, but I noticed there is not a "custom.pm" for CaptivePortal.
Isn't there a more update-resistant way?

Nicola

Il 14/10/15 15:33, Derek Wuelfrath ha scritto:
> Hello Nicola,
>
>> Since I updated from 4.1 to 4.7
> You know that we released 5.4 last week right ? ;)
>
>>> performing node registration ...
>>> register.cgi(0) INFO: performing node registration MAC:
>>> XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX pid:  (pf::web::_sanitize_and_register)
>> which I used to associate user to its activity (in case of need).
>> Is it possible to have this restored by configuring logs somewhere?
> That was part of the old captive portal mechanisms (CGI). This code have been 
> removed.
> To cover the case you want (a node registers through the captive-portal), you 
> may want to add a logging statement to the “WebNodeRegister” method in 
> /usr/local/pf/html/captive-portal/lib/captive-portal/PacketFence/Controller/CaptivePortal.pm
>
> Cheers!
> dw.
>
> —
> Derek Wuelfrath
> dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (www.packetfence.org)
>
>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:55 AM, Nicola Canepa  wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>> Since I updated from 4.1 to 4.7, I cannot find anymore in the logs the line
>>> performing node registration ...
>>> register.cgi(0) INFO: performing node registration MAC:
>>> XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX pid:  (pf::web::_sanitize_and_register)
>> which I used to associate user to its activity (in case of need).
>> Is it possible to have this restored by configuring logs somewhere?
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Nicola Canepa
>> Tel: +39-0522-399-3474
>> canep...@mmfg.it
>> ---
>> Il contenuto della presente comunicazione è riservato e destinato 
>> esclusivamente ai destinatari indicati. Nel caso in cui sia ricevuto da 
>> persona diversa dal destinatario sono proibite la diffusione, la 
>> distribuzione e la copia. Nel caso riceveste la presente per errore, Vi 
>> preghiamo di informarci e di distruggerlo e/o cancellarlo dal Vostro 
>> computer, senza utilizzare i dati contenuti. La presente comunicazione 
>> (comprensiva dei documenti allegati) non avrà valore di proposta 
>> contrattuale e/o accettazione di proposte provenienti dal destinatario, nè 
>> rinuncia o riconoscimento di diritti, debiti e/o crediti, nè sarà 
>> impegnativa, qualora non sia sottoscritto successivo accordo da chi può 
>> validamente obbligarci. Non deriverà alcuna responsabilità precontrattuale a 
>> ns. carico, se la presente non sia seguita da contratto sottoscritto dalle 
>> parti.
>>
>> The content of the above communication is strictly confidential and reserved 
>> solely for the referred addressees. In the event of receipt by persons 
>> different from the addressee, copying, alteration and distribution are 
>> forbidden. If received by mistake we ask you to inform us and to destroy 
>> and/or delete from your computer without using the data herein contained. 
>> The present message (eventual annexes inclusive) shall not be considered a 
>> contractual proposal and/or acceptance of offer from the addressee, nor 
>> waiver recognizance of rights, debts  and/or credits, nor shall it be 
>> binding when not executed as a subsequent agreement by persons who could 
>> lawfully represent us. No pre-contractual liability shall apply to us when 
>> the present communication is not followed by any binding agreement between 
>> the parties.
>>
>>
>> --
>> ___
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
> --
> ___
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

-- 

Nicola Canepa
Tel: +39-0522-399-3474
canep...@mmfg.it
---
Il contenuto della presente comunicazione è riservato e destinato 
esclusivamente ai destinatari indicati. Nel caso in cui sia ricevuto da persona 
diversa dal destinatario sono proibite la diffusione, la distribuzione e la 
copia. Nel caso riceveste la presente per errore, Vi preghiamo di informarci e 
di distruggerlo e/o cancellarlo dal Vostro computer, senza utilizzare i dati 
contenuti. La presente comunicazione (comprensiva dei documenti allegati) non 
avrà valore di proposta contrattuale e/o accettazione di proposte provenienti 
dal destinatario, nè rinuncia o riconoscimento di diritti, debiti e/o crediti, 
nè sarà impegnativa, qualora non sia sottoscritto successivo accordo da chi può 
validamente obbligarci. Non deriverà alcuna responsabilità precontrattuale a 
ns. carico, se la presente non sia seguita da contratto sottoscritto dalle 
parti.

The content of the above communication is