thing
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."
- The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
> On May 31, 2018, at 11:54, Ludovic Marcotte via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
>
> On 2018-05-31 11:49 AM, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
>
bind is enough and it doesn't really
> matter the hash you will use.
> Regards
>
> Fabrice
>
>
>
> Le 2018-05-29 à 17:38, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users a
> écrit :
>> Docker to the rescue. Was able to get a simple openLDAP container up and
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:38 PM, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
> wrote:
> I think about this one http://directory.fedoraproject.org/ who is coming with
> an admin interface.
>
> https://www.ehowstuff.com/setup-389-directory-server-on-centos-7/
>
> Le 2
Hi all,
I’m looking for a quick and simple LDAP install I can use with
packetfence as a temporary authentication source. Before I stand up an
openldap server, or perhaps openldap in a container, is anyone using something
that’s quicker to stand up and get running? I’d love something
I have the option of using Office365, potentially, for authentication. Has
anyone successfully set this up? If so, is there a runbook somewhere I can
refer to?
---
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
xenoph...@godshell.com
---
"A common mistake that
registering the dock itself.
>
> Jes
>
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
> [mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
> Sendt: 27. november 2017 23:17
> Til: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jason '
On 11/24/17 06:13, Jes Kasper Klittum via PacketFence-users wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I have a case running with Inverse, but just wanted to check if anyone
> else has gotten around this problem.
>
> We have started using USB-C docks for some of our Lenovo ThinkPads and
> are getting into issues
ssign the Authentication::Password you created to a root module and use
> that root module on the portal.
>
> Btw you need to have 7.1 minimum.
>
> Regards
>
> Fabrice
>
>
>
> Le 2017-07-13 à 15:55, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
> a écr
Hi all,
I have two sites I need to manage via Packetfence. Right now, my
options are to either put a PF server at each location (which is the
current plan) or to remotely manage one site via a single PF server.
We'd like to be able to replicate the users across both sites since we
have
Hi!
So I think I have most everything working on the wired side, except
guest logins. The default email/sms/etc stuff works, but I'm looking to
use a guest password for access.. Something along the lines of having
the guest add their name, email, and a predefined guest password for
On 7/13/17 04:31, luca comes via PacketFence-users wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> any suggestion on this problem? Is there a way to clean remove roles
> from pf? Any roles created and then removed from roles.conf is shown
> even after reload.
As far as I understand it, the definition of those roles is
On 7/11/17 17:01, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users wrote:
> On 7/11/17 15:55, Louis Munro wrote:
>> You don't need to enable the captive portal.
>> It's on by default if you have an interface defined as type=registration.
>> As long as you are sent to the regis
On 7/11/17 15:55, Louis Munro wrote:
> You don't need to enable the captive portal.
> It's on by default if you have an interface defined as type=registration.
> As long as you are sent to the registration VLAN, and you get your IP
> and DNS configuration from the PacketFence managed dhcpd you
On 7/11/17 15:24, Louis Munro wrote:
> Create a different portal per connection type.
>
> E.g. One dot1x profile for which autoregistration is enabled, one MAC
> authentication for which it isn't.
>
> That should do it.
Ok, giving this a try now. I did create a portal and put a filter of
On 7/7/17 12:32, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users wrote:
> On 7/6/17 17:01, Louis Munro wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>> At first glance, the logs below seem to indicate something is wrong when
>> it comes to assigning a role to the device.
>>
>> Ca
On 7/11/17 13:58, Louis Munro wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> Sorry for the delay. We've been busy with the latest release here...
No worries, I saw the release announcement. So I'm behind.. again.. :P
> I think the issue below is that you have enabled autoregistration on the
> default profile.
> So your
Greetings,
I seem to be missing something in my config and I wonder if you can
help. Simply put, plugging in a random device does not push that
devices port into the captive portal vlan, it simply leaves it in vlan 1
(which is the default on the switches) and the device has no access.
Greetings,
In a previous life, we used Packetfence for a campus network with
thousands of users. The user database was a well established LDAP
directory that had been in existence for a while.
In my current life, however, we have no such database. I'm looking for
a solution. I
18 matches
Mail list logo