Re: [PacketFence-users] LDAP

2018-05-31 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
thing completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy > On May 31, 2018, at 11:54, Ludovic Marcotte via PacketFence-users > wrote: > > On 2018-05-31 11:49 AM, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users >

Re: [PacketFence-users] LDAP

2018-05-31 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
bind is enough and it doesn't really > matter the hash you will use. > Regards > > Fabrice > > > > Le 2018-05-29 à 17:38, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users a > écrit : >> Docker to the rescue. Was able to get a simple openLDAP container up and

Re: [PacketFence-users] LDAP

2018-05-29 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:38 PM, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users > wrote: > I think about this one http://directory.fedoraproject.org/ who is coming with > an admin interface. > > https://www.ehowstuff.com/setup-389-directory-server-on-centos-7/ > > Le 2

[PacketFence-users] LDAP

2018-05-23 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
Hi all, I’m looking for a quick and simple LDAP install I can use with packetfence as a temporary authentication source. Before I stand up an openldap server, or perhaps openldap in a container, is anyone using something that’s quicker to stand up and get running? I’d love something

[PacketFence-users] Packetfence AD Auth and Office365

2018-05-23 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
I have the option of using Office365, potentially, for authentication. Has anyone successfully set this up? If so, is there a runbook somewhere I can refer to? --- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold xenoph...@godshell.com --- "A common mistake that

Re: [PacketFence-users] USB-C docks and MAB

2017-11-29 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
registering the dock itself. > > Jes > > -Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users > [mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net] > Sendt: 27. november 2017 23:17 > Til: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: Jason '

Re: [PacketFence-users] USB-C docks and MAB

2017-11-27 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
On 11/24/17 06:13, Jes Kasper Klittum via PacketFence-users wrote: > Hey guys, > > I have a case running with Inverse, but just wanted to check if anyone > else has gotten around this problem. > > We have started using USB-C docks for some of our Lenovo ThinkPads and > are getting into issues

Re: [PacketFence-users] Guest Logins

2017-07-18 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
ssign the Authentication::Password you created to a root module and use > that root module on the portal. > > Btw you need to have 7.1 minimum. > > Regards > > Fabrice > > > > Le 2017-07-13 à 15:55, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users > a écr

[PacketFence-users] Multi-site PF and clustering?

2017-07-13 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
Hi all, I have two sites I need to manage via Packetfence. Right now, my options are to either put a PF server at each location (which is the current plan) or to remotely manage one site via a single PF server. We'd like to be able to replicate the users across both sites since we have

[PacketFence-users] Guest Logins

2017-07-13 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
Hi! So I think I have most everything working on the wired side, except guest logins. The default email/sms/etc stuff works, but I'm looking to use a guest password for access.. Something along the lines of having the guest add their name, email, and a predefined guest password for

Re: [PacketFence-users] Inconsistent roles in switches definition

2017-07-13 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
On 7/13/17 04:31, luca comes via PacketFence-users wrote: > Dear all, > > any suggestion on this problem? Is there a way to clean remove roles > from pf? Any roles created and then removed from roles.conf is shown > even after reload. As far as I understand it, the definition of those roles is

Re: [PacketFence-users] "default" user not pushing device to login portal

2017-07-13 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
On 7/11/17 17:01, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users wrote: > On 7/11/17 15:55, Louis Munro wrote: >> You don't need to enable the captive portal. >> It's on by default if you have an interface defined as type=registration. >> As long as you are sent to the regis

Re: [PacketFence-users] "default" user not pushing device to login portal

2017-07-11 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
On 7/11/17 15:55, Louis Munro wrote: > You don't need to enable the captive portal. > It's on by default if you have an interface defined as type=registration. > As long as you are sent to the registration VLAN, and you get your IP > and DNS configuration from the PacketFence managed dhcpd you

Re: [PacketFence-users] "default" user not pushing device to login portal

2017-07-11 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
On 7/11/17 15:24, Louis Munro wrote: > Create a different portal per connection type. > > E.g. One dot1x profile for which autoregistration is enabled, one MAC > authentication for which it isn't. > > That should do it. Ok, giving this a try now. I did create a portal and put a filter of

Re: [PacketFence-users] "default" user not pushing device to login portal

2017-07-11 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
On 7/7/17 12:32, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users wrote: > On 7/6/17 17:01, Louis Munro wrote: >> Hi Jason, >> At first glance, the logs below seem to indicate something is wrong when >> it comes to assigning a role to the device. >> >> Ca

Re: [PacketFence-users] "default" user not pushing device to login portal

2017-07-11 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
On 7/11/17 13:58, Louis Munro wrote: > Hi Jason, > Sorry for the delay. We've been busy with the latest release here... No worries, I saw the release announcement. So I'm behind.. again.. :P > I think the issue below is that you have enabled autoregistration on the > default profile. > So your

[PacketFence-users] "default" user not pushing device to login portal

2017-07-06 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
Greetings, I seem to be missing something in my config and I wonder if you can help. Simply put, plugging in a random device does not push that devices port into the captive portal vlan, it simply leaves it in vlan 1 (which is the default on the switches) and the device has no access.

[PacketFence-users] User accounts

2017-06-06 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold via PacketFence-users
Greetings, In a previous life, we used Packetfence for a campus network with thousands of users. The user database was a well established LDAP directory that had been in existence for a while. In my current life, however, we have no such database. I'm looking for a solution. I