On 10-2-2020 14:25, Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users wrote:
Hello MJ,
HTML files are generated from MJML files using a Makefile in yout Git
repository. Unless you know how to re-generate HTML files from MJML
files, you should edit HTML files.
Thanks!
MJ
Super, I found it! Edited the mjml file.
Thanks!
On 4-2-2020 13:28, Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users wrote:
Hello MJ,
On 04/02/2020 10:39, lists via PacketFence-users wrote:
We could of course customize the files there, but we are unsure how
well this would work with packetfence
Hi,
We have defined some triggers to isolate and notify endusers, based on
the default templates under
/usr/local/pf/html/captive-portal/templates/emails
We could of course customize the files there, but we are unsure how well
this would work with packetfence updates. Plus: do we edit the
Hi Uzzi,
It looks fine from my point of view.
https://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-checker.html#hostname=https://inverse.ca/downloads/GPG_PUBLIC_KEY
MJ
On 3-2-2020 11:36, Andrea Lenarduzzi via PacketFence-users wrote:
I've add http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/debian stretch to
Hi,
Not sure to consider it a bug or not, but we noticed using the ZEG 9.2
(inline mode) that when:
- search a node
- set it to unreg
- save
- brought back to the search results, with:
- device listed correctly as unreg
- go to the actual physical device
- go through the registration process
Hi,
Sometimes you want to get rid of all old pf logs, and see just new log
lines as they are generated.
I always:
- service rsyslog stop
- rm -f /usr/local/pf/logs/*
- service rsyslog start
- tail -f /usr/local/pf/logs/*
On CentOS this works as expected.
However, on debian this causes all
Hi,
Here in the debian install FAQ:
https://packetfence.org/support/faq/how-to-install-packetfence-on-debian.html
we can read to do:
apt-key adv --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key 0x810273C4
but after doing that, apt still complains:
Get:5 http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/debian
se, no user, nothing.
--
Üdvözlettel,
Szél Gábor
WanTax Kft.
tel.: +36 20 3838 171
fax: +36 82 357 585
email:gabor.s...@wantax.hu
web:http://wantax.hu
web:http://halozatom.hu
2019. 10. 21. 13:45 keltezéssel, lists via PacketFence-users írta:
Hi Szél Gábor,
Just for the record: just did a 9.1
Hi Szél Gábor,
Just for the record: just did a 9.1 test install, using fresh minimal
debian 9, and the instructions on
https://packetfence.org/support/faq/how-to-install-packetfence-on-debian.html
Instructions are missing a step:
> apt-get install dirmngr
During the install, there were many
Hi,
No expert, but:
On 19-7-2019 11:12, adr.lebron--- via PacketFence-users wrote:
juil. 17 14:28:43 debian pfcmd[4448]: FATAL - please define exactly one
management interface
juil. 17 14:28:43 debian pfcmd[4448]: WARNING - internal network(s) not
defined!
juil. 17 14:28:43 debian
Hi,
We would like to provide a dhcp domain-search option for our packetfence
(7.1) inline clients.
The gui only allows for a dhcp ip range to be set.
Is it possible to provide a search option somewhere?
MJ
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
Hi Fabrice,
On 20-2-2018 0:40, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users wrote:
mark match 0x1 mean the devices that are registered. (cf ipset -L).
So check if unreg devices are still redirect to the portal.
Just verified that, and this still works.
Thanks!
Hi,
We are trying to specifically allow only certain traffic from our
forward-internal-inline-if interface, and have edited our iptables.conf
accordingly:
root@packetfence:/usr/local/pf# iptables -L forward-internal-inline-if -n
--line-numbers
Chain forward-internal-inline-if (1
Hi Fabrice,
On 16-1-2018 14:54, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users wrote:
Hello,
you can play with iptables.conf in the conf directory in order to add
your custom rules.
So, in the case of limiting outgoing traffic for inline nat clients to
http/https/dns, do you mean adding lines
Hi,
We're using packetfence in inline modus for our wifi (10.10.10.0/24)
segment. The external packetfence interface is inside our dmz lan /24
segment. (192.84.141.0/24)
We currently firewall on our gateway 192.84.141.1. Even though this
works, it has the negative side effect that everybody
Hi Fabrice,
On 4-10-2017 14:51, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users wrote:
What you can do is to install security onion on another server and
configure it to send the alert to the packetfence server. (see doc).
We didn't know security union. Thanks for mentioning it!
MJ
On 3-10-2017 15:11, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users wrote:
you can create a connection profile based on the connection type
Ethernet-EAP and activate autoregistration on it.
Perfect!
Worked like a charm! :-)
Thanks Fabrice
Hi,
We have an pf-inline wifi-segment with a captive portal, and also a
pf-out-of-band wired network, where we have enabled 802.1x / radius
authentication for our windows workstations.
We authenticate using the workstation account first, and then change to
the logged-in user account. This
Hi Frederic,
On 19-9-2017 10:39, Frederic Hermann via PacketFence-users wrote:
Well, here we created our own cleanup tasks, using the database-cleaner.pl perl
script in /usr/local/pf/tools
Did you also find the 'regular' packetfence GUI person_cleanup &
node_cleanup didn't work..? Or simply
On 18-9-2017 12:46, lists via PacketFence-users wrote:
Hi,
No response... :-(
Does that mean that the tasks
- person_cleanup
and
- node_cleanup
are working for everybody here? On 7.1?
Anyone?
--
Check out
On 12-9-2017 14:42, Arthur Emerson via PacketFence-users wrote:
What we do with PF 5.x is have a limit (N) on the number of devices that
guest users can register...and then make sure that there are N+1 bogus
MAC addresses registered/active for that user account. Anyone who tries
to register
Hi,
Is there a way to 'blacklist' specific ldap usernames from registering
devices in the packetfence portal?
Running pf 7 with inline guest portal, with an AD ldap-based usersource.
I tried creating a rule under our ldap authentication source:
- condition 'username'
- role REJECT
- access
Hi Fabrice, list,
On 13-7-2017 2:23, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users wrote:
when it happen, can you check in the database just after the duration has been
extended ?
select * from node where mac="9c:2a:70:31:9b:9f';
ok, here it is:
after the link in the registration email has been
Hi,
For you information: starting packetfence 7.2, samba will use
auto-discovery for DC location. (password server = *)
MJ
On 27-6-2017 15:52, Louis Munro via PacketFence-users wrote:
Hi Luca,
I am no Active Directory expert, but I believe you don't have much to do
for that since the DC is
Hi Fabrice,
Just to provide feedback:
On 21-6-2017 1:10, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users wrote:
I just tried upgrading our production network from 5.6 to 7.1, and
even though things seemed to have worked out, after a while we
discovered that some nodes were 'unregistered' after the
On 19-6-2017 22:17, lists via PacketFence-users wrote:
Hi,
I just tried upgrading our production network from 5.6 to 7.1, and even
though things seemed to have worked out, after a while we discovered
that some nodes were 'unregistered' after the upgrade. (they were
registrered before
Hi,
I just tried upgrading our production network from 5.6 to 7.1, and even
though things seemed to have worked out, after a while we discovered
that some nodes were 'unregistered' after the upgrade. (they were
registrered before the upgrade, on 5.6.1)
Also, unlike normally, these
On 12-6-2017 20:48, lists via PacketFence-users wrote:
"Project-Id-Version: 7.0.0 POT-Creation-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE
PO-Revision-Date: 2017-04-19 11:56-0400 Last-Translator: Inverse inc.
<i...@inverse.ca> Language-Team: English Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:
Hi,
So, just for fun I tried a fresh install of packetfence 7.1.0 on debian 8.
As far as I know, we need to configure the OS debian to start mysql.
However, also Packetfence tries to start something on port 3306 as well
(haproxy) so there seems to be a conflict? Found that out, because I
29 matches
Mail list logo
