On Sat, 29 Jan 2022, 19:07:17 +0100, Syds Bearda wrote:
> [...]
> Is the 15.4 repo available already then? I don’t see it for Broadcom-wl yet.
I'll enable builds for 15.4 as soon as PMBS is available again.
@Stefan: dunno if you've seen, but PMBS is completely dead!
> /Syds
Cheers.
l8er
On Sat, 29 Jan 2022, at 16:01, Bjørn Lie wrote:
>> lø., jan. 29 2022 at kl. 13.21 +0100 +0100 skrev Olaf Hering
>> følgende:
>>>
>>> Three are also two pkg containers for 15.4, to be populated.
>>>
>>>
>>> Olaf
>>
>> Thank you, I will get to those later today or tomorrow, most likely
>>
lø., jan. 29 2022 at kl. 13.21 +0100 +0100 skrev Olaf Hering
følgende:
Three are also two pkg containers for 15.4, to be populated.
Olaf
Thank you, I will get to those later today or tomorrow, most likely
today.
/Bjørn
Packages for 15.4 now in place.
I did add baselibs.conf, even
lø., jan. 29 2022 at kl. 13.21 +0100 +0100 skrev Olaf Hering
følgende:
Sat, 29 Jan 2022 12:01:11 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
Thank you, even if that moved a bit quicker than I expected.
Three are also two pkg containers for 15.4, to be populated.
Olaf
Thank you, I will get to those later
Sat, 29 Jan 2022 12:01:11 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
> Thank you, even if that moved a bit quicker than I expected.
Three are also two pkg containers for 15.4, to be populated.
Olaf
pgp7Zp5oSE4wc.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
___
Packman
lø., jan. 29 2022 at kl. 10.27 +0100 +0100 skrev Olaf Hering
følgende:
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 18:05:08 +0100 Olaf Hering :
In the end someone needs to create, submit and maintain the
required packages.
I moved the codec packages to Essentials, and removed the other
packages. This change may
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 18:05:08 +0100 Olaf Hering :
> In the end someone needs to create, submit and maintain the required packages.
I moved the codec packages to Essentials, and removed the other packages. This
change may appear on the mirrors around noon UTC.
You may want to announce this new
Hi Bjørn,
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022, 18:53:09 +0100, Bjørn Lie wrote:
> fr., jan. 28 2022 at kl. 18.15 +0100 +0100 skrev Manfred Hollstein
> følgende:
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2022, 18:05:08 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > > Fri, 28 Jan 2022 17:52:04 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
> > >
> > > > Ok so as I said, you
fr., jan. 28 2022 at kl. 18.15 +0100 +0100 skrev Manfred Hollstein
følgende:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022, 18:05:08 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 17:52:04 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
> Ok so as I said, you want to do an old style linked package,
witch we
> now do via _multibuild (see
>
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022, 18:05:08 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Fri, 28 Jan 2022 17:52:04 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
>
> > Ok so as I said, you want to do an old style linked package, witch we
> > now do via _multibuild (see
> > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/webkit2gtk3 as
> > an
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 17:52:04 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
> Ok so as I said, you want to do an old style linked package, witch we
> now do via _multibuild (see
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/webkit2gtk3 as
> an example).
> My initial rejection stands, Factory maintainers will
fr., jan. 28 2022 at kl. 17.12 +0100 +0100 skrev Olaf Hering
følgende:
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:28:57 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
As to adding the "naugthy" bits in a separate spec - There is no
way I
can get those specs into Factory, as they will not be able to build
on
the main obs at all, since
Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:28:57 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
> As to adding the "naugthy" bits in a separate spec - There is no way I
> can get those specs into Factory, as they will not be able to build on
> the main obs at all, since the dependencies are not available.
> If you mean doing it as a a
On 28/01/2022 15.46, Bjørn Lie wrote:
fr., jan. 28 2022 at kl. 12.43 +0100 +0100 skrev Carlos E. R.
følgende:
On 28/01/2022 12.28, Bjørn Lie wrote:
The way I have it
in my home repo here on pmbs, will allow users to just add packman repo,
type zypper inr, and bad/ugly-extra packages and their
fr., jan. 28 2022 at kl. 12.43 +0100 +0100 skrev Carlos E. R.
følgende:
On 28/01/2022 12.28, Bjørn Lie wrote:
The way I have it
in my home repo here on pmbs, will allow users to just add packman
repo,
type zypper inr, and bad/ugly-extra packages and their deps will
automagically install.
On 28/01/2022 12.28, Bjørn Lie wrote:
The way I have it
in my home repo here on pmbs, will allow users to just add packman repo,
type zypper inr, and bad/ugly-extra packages and their deps will
automagically install. Why make it harder than it is needed to be? Lets
provide endusers with as
to., jan. 27 2022 at kl. 18.22 +0100 +0100 skrev Olaf Hering
følgende:
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:06:19 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
This could however all have been avoided if we switched packman to
only
build the extra codecs in orig addon.
If gstreamer is really modular, remove all conditionals from
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:17:54 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
> Would it not be a better solution to disable use for build flag instead?
This may not be propagated into the Multimedia project.
Olaf
pgpOiQCoKzYYu.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
___
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:06:19 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
> This could however all have been avoided if we switched packman to only
> build the extra codecs in orig addon.
If gstreamer is really modular, remove all conditionals from
gstreamer-plugins-bad/ugly and split the problematic parts into a separate
to., jan. 27 2022 at kl. 13.13 +0100 +0100 skrev Bjørn Lie
følgende:
Now I'm really confused, no changes done over at obs, nor checked
into Factory (ref to gst-bad), yet suddenly gstreamer-plugins-bad
builds just fine on the pmbs?
From what I can tell, no changes done to prjconf for
Now I'm really confused, no changes done over at obs, nor checked into
Factory (ref to gst-bad), yet suddenly gstreamer-plugins-bad builds
just fine on the pmbs?
From what I can tell, no changes done to prjconf for essential either.
Anyone able to shead some light on this?
/Bjørn
to., jan. 27 2022 at kl. 11.42 +0100 +0100 skrev Olaf Hering
følgende:
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:23:47 +0100 Olaf Hering :
I only remember a discussion about it, with the outcome "fdk_aac is
not compatible with GPL".
fdk-aac-free-2.0.0 does not come with a license, so it is unclear if
this
to., jan. 27 2022 at kl. 11.31 +0100 +0100 skrev Bjørn Lie
følgende:
Well I only used the non pkgconfig for "Packmans" benefit, so fine by
me, I'll change it back to using pkgconfig().
/Bjørn
But again - the REAL solution is to stop rebuilding the whole
gst-plugins-bad/ugly saga, and
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:23:47 +0100 Olaf Hering :
> I only remember a discussion about it, with the outcome "fdk_aac is not
> compatible with GPL".
fdk-aac-free-2.0.0 does not come with a license, so it is unclear if this
statement even changed.
Olaf
pgpKpdt0DlwlD.pgp
Description: Digitale
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:23:47 +0100 Olaf Hering :
> As a result ffmpeg does dlopen to use its functionality.
I guess the ffmpeg maintainers may need to revisit this part as well.
Olaf
pgpO5RqTmwAQh.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
___
to., jan. 27 2022 at kl. 11.23 +0100 +0100 skrev Olaf Hering
følgende:
If an expanded package name is requested, there will be a conflict
due to exact %version-%release Requires in the devel package.
Hence the established practice to refer to capabilities via
pkgconfig() instead of
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:20:21 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
> %define _without_fdk_aac 1 set in Essential prjconf.
I guess this needs to be revisited now.
This define is correct due to the license implications.
All packages which currently use an expanded package name need to be changed to
pkgconfig(), to
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:06:19 +0100 Bjørn Lie :
> No I added that one due to knowing that you on packman did not want to
> build it with full fdk-aac in the past.
I only remember a discussion about it, with the outcome "fdk_aac is not
compatible with GPL".
As a result ffmpeg does dlopen to use
to., jan. 27 2022 at kl. 11.06 +0100 +0100 skrev Bjørn Lie
følgende:
No I added that one due to knowing that you on packman did not want
to build it with full fdk-aac in the past.
Hence I did it this way, so that it would be built with the altered
sources we have in main obs, and not the
to., jan. 27 2022 at kl. 10.42 +0100 +0100 skrev Manfred Hollstein
følgende:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, 10:26:28 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 10:19:05 +0100 Manfred Hollstein
mailto:manfre...@gmx.net>>:
> Can someone please branch it to Staging and Essentials please?
This will
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, 10:26:28 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Thu, 27 Jan 2022 10:19:05 +0100 Manfred Hollstein :
>
> > Can someone please branch it to Staging and Essentials please?
>
> This will lead to a conflict because both provide the same API, and hopefully
> even the same ABI due to
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 10:19:05 +0100 Manfred Hollstein :
> Can someone please branch it to Staging and Essentials please?
This will lead to a conflict because both provide the same API, and hopefully
even the same ABI due to identical SONAME.
Does fdk-aac provide something which is not provided by
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, 10:13:08 +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, 10:00:42 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:48:38 +0100 Manfred Hollstein :
> >
> > > @Olaf, would you mind to give it a try?
> >
> > I kicked the scheduler.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > But as long as
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, 10:00:42 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:48:38 +0100 Manfred Hollstein :
>
> > @Olaf, would you mind to give it a try?
>
> I kicked the scheduler.
Thanks!
> But as long as openSUSE.org:openSUSE:Factory/gstreamer-plugins-bad remains
> broken, the package
Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:48:38 +0100 Manfred Hollstein :
> @Olaf, would you mind to give it a try?
I kicked the scheduler.
But as long as openSUSE.org:openSUSE:Factory/gstreamer-plugins-bad remains
broken, the package will not start to build.
Olaf
pgps6T2pE32qr.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur
In OBS staging, that's what I meant by "upstream"
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 09:48 Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, 09:08:51 +0100, Andrei Dziahel wrote:
> > Ya, experiencing this for couple of days now too. The upstream seems to
> fix the
> > issue and the package is in the staging
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, 09:08:51 +0100, Andrei Dziahel wrote:
> Ya, experiencing this for couple of days now too. The upstream seems to fix
> the
> issue and the package is in the staging now.
The package in Staging is a link to the one in Essentials and there are
no source changes at all:
Ya, experiencing this for couple of days now too. The upstream seems to fix
the issue and the package is in the staging now.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022, 14:44 Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> trying to "zypper dup" atm results in various issues:
>
> 15 Problems:
> Problem: problem with
Hi there,
trying to "zypper dup" atm results in various issues:
15 Problems:
Problem: problem with the installed gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.18.5-6.2.x86_64
Problem: problem with the installed
gstreamer-plugins-bad-lang-1.18.5-6.2.noarch
Problem: problem with the installed
39 matches
Mail list logo
