[packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser
JFYI, been working on vlc 2.0 the past few days. I obviously started from dimstar's spec file but made a few adjustments to build properly on all our distros in Essential, and also enabled libtar support. Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2, and sometimes for

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden todd rme
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: phonon-backend-vlc builds just fine with vlc-2.0.1 (just needs a few changes to the spec file as it currently requires vlc 1.2). I can't test it myself, but I'll submit the changes and if people notice that

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Cristian Morales Vega
On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2, and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all the dependencies (those packages are named libxxx-for-sle or libxxx-for-older-than-11.4, etc...

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden todd rme
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Cristian Morales Vega reddw...@opensuse.org wrote: On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2, and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all the

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Christian
Am 05.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega: On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleserpascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2, and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all the dependencies (those packages are named

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser
On 2012-04-05 14:06:12 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega reddw...@opensuse.org wrote: On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2, and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all the

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Cristian Morales Vega
On 5 April 2012 14:27, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote: There were some build errors for openSUSE 12.1.  I think I fixed them, but with vlc no longer working I cannot test the build, so there may still be build errors.  If the new version of the backend is not in the repo by tuesday when

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser
On 2012-04-05 15:54:17 (+0200), Christian ch...@computersalat.de wrote: Am 05.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega: On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleserpascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2, and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Christian
Hi Unrelated... why are we building against both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2? Every binary compiled against SLE_11 should work with SLE-11-SP2. Does it? I mean, really? SLE-11-SP2 ships different libs and different versions of libs so ... If you have a package build against SLE_11 SP1 that does not

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Malcolm
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:43:58 +0200 Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: On 2012-04-05 14:06:12 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega reddw...@opensuse.org wrote: On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11,

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Cristian Morales Vega
On 5 April 2012 15:45, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: Henne added SLE-11-SP2. And why go with SP1 if we can go with SP2 ? SP1 seems to be the oldest supported version. Building against it warranties it will work with all the supported versions of SLE-11 (those being SP1 and SP2,

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser
On 2012-04-05 16:02:30 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega reddw...@opensuse.org wrote: On 5 April 2012 15:45, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: Henne added SLE-11-SP2. And why go with SP1 if we can go with SP2 ? SP1 seems to be the oldest supported version. Building against it

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Malcolm
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:09:29 +0200 Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: On 2012-04-05 16:02:30 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega reddw...@opensuse.org wrote: On 5 April 2012 15:45, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote: Henne added SLE-11-SP2. And why go with SP1 if we

[packman] No VLC Mozilla plugin for VLC 2x

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Willem Franssen
Dear Packman Team, Thanks VLC 2x is available at last. But your VLC packages version 2.0.1-2.2. don't provide the VLC Mozilla plugin. Besides that I have to downgrade some libvlccore packages. I don't understand that. So it's not usefull for me and for the time being I've to stick with VLC

[packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Smartysmart34
Hi all, Just tried to upgrade to VLC 2.0. I encountered a whole bunch of cross dependencies from libpostproc52, libavutil51, libxine1-codecs... So if I want to upgrade libavutil51 to the new version I will have to uninstall libpostproc51 and if I do so libxine1-codecs is broken. This is too

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Manfred Tremmel
Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2012, 22:24:25 schrieb Smartysmart34: Hi all, Just tried to upgrade to VLC 2.0. I encountered a whole bunch of cross dependencies from libpostproc52, libavutil51, libxine1-codecs... So if I want to upgrade libavutil51 to the new version I will have to uninstall

Re: [packman] vlc 2.0

2012-04-05 Diskussionsfäden Smartysmart34
Am 06.04.2012 00:29, schrieb Manfred Tremmel: Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2012, 22:24:25 schrieb Smartysmart34: Hi all, Just tried to upgrade to VLC 2.0. I encountered a whole bunch of cross dependencies from libpostproc52, libavutil51, libxine1-codecs... So if I want to upgrade libavutil51 to