Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

Hallo, it is better to end this thread. I do not intend any longer to submit my hamradio packages to Packman. In order to free the limited resources of PMBS the packages will be removed very soon from my home project. I will continue to update all packages necessary for my daily "busyness"

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey) (Walter Fey)

On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 09:47 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 at 12:23 AM > From: "Walter Fey" > > > > I agreed to this and informed him, that due to serious legal > > concerns, > > I cannot publish the copyright remark that is pointing to SUSE > >

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey) (Walter Fey)

On 3 August 2017 at 09:47, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 at 12:23 AM > From: "Walter Fey" >> >> I agreed to this and informed him, that due to serious legal concerns, >> I cannot publish the copyright remark that is pointing to SUSE LINUX

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey) (Walter Fey)

Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 at 12:23 AM From: "Walter Fey" > > I agreed to this and informed him, that due to serious legal concerns, > I cannot publish the copyright remark that is pointing to SUSE LINUX GmbH, > Nuernberg, Germany without a written approval from this

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

On Thu 3. Aug 2017 at 02:01, Pascal Bleser wrote: > 2017-08-01 18:02 GMT+02:00 Richard Brown : > > On Tue 1. Aug 2017 at 15:33, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > [...] > >> If so I suspect it's related to the missing header with

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

2017-08-02 10:08 GMT+02:00 : [...] > As Richard explained, this might be a bit dangerous adventure for > packman. I think we got the threatening message at this point. > Apart from that I would say that motivation for moving to > packman is a bit weak +1 > my understanding

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

2017-08-01 18:02 GMT+02:00 Richard Brown : > On Tue 1. Aug 2017 at 15:33, Luigi Baldoni wrote: [...] >> If so I suspect it's related to the missing header with copyright >> attribution to SUSE AG. >> >> Now, the question is: would Packman be ok with that?

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey) (Walter Fey)

Hallo, I think I have to explain the whole situation from my point of few more detailed that I planned to do. Most of the packages I like to submit to Packman were maintained at the hamradio project at the openSUSE build service to offer actual packages of hamradio related programs to

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

On Wed 2. Aug 2017 at 09:26, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 at 10:08 AM > From: mar...@pluskal.org > > > > On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 21:41 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > > > No. I was talking about the copyring attribution for the spec file > > > itself, with

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 at 10:28 AM From: "Martin Pluskal" > > Before slandering anyone, now I see that packages in > > home:dl8fcl:hamradio > > have the following header: > > > > # > > # spec file for package foo > > # > > # Copyright (c) 2017 Walter Fey DL8FCL > >

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 10:25 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 at 10:08 AM > From: mar...@pluskal.org > > > > On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 21:41 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > > > No. I was talking about the copyring attribution for the spec > > > file > > > itself, with which

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 at 10:08 AM From: mar...@pluskal.org > > On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 21:41 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > > No. I was talking about the copyring attribution for the spec file > > itself, with which I seem to recall > > from a previous interaction OP has a problem with. >

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 21:41 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 at 6:02 PM > From: "Richard Brown" > > > > You mean the spec file, changes file etc when you refer to > > > > 'form'? > > > > > > If so I suspect it's related to the missing header

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

On Tue 1. Aug 2017 at 22:29, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 at 10:30 PM > From: "Richard Brown" > > > On Tue 1. Aug 2017 at 20:42, Luigi Baldoni aloi...@gmx.com]> wrote:Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 at

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 at 10:30 PM From: "Richard Brown" > > On Tue 1. Aug 2017 at 20:42, Luigi Baldoni > > wrote:Sent: Tuesday, August 01, > > 2017 at 6:02 PM > >  > > No. I was talking about the copyring attribution for

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

On Tue 1. Aug 2017 at 20:42, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 at 6:02 PM > From: "Richard Brown" > > I would hope the answer is "no" > > > > If Packman receives packages which clearly remove the legal copyright > attribution of

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 at 6:02 PM From: "Richard Brown" > > > You mean the spec file, changes file etc when you refer to 'form'? > > > > If so I suspect it's related to the missing header with copyright > > attribution > > to SUSE AG. > > > > Now, the question is:

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

On Tue 1. Aug 2017 at 15:33, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 at 2:22 PM > From: Malcolm > > > > >A few weeks ago I was informed by somebody, who is member of the > > >openSUSE Board and employee of the SUSE GmbH, that the form as

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 at 2:22 PM From: Malcolm > > >A few weeks ago I was informed by somebody, who is member of the > >openSUSE Board and employee of the SUSE GmbH, that the form as this > >was done for more than ten years is not welcome anymore. > > Hi >

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

On Tue 01 Aug 2017 01:31:05 PM CDT, Walter Fey wrote: >> > From the very beginning SUSE LINUX contained a lot of hamradio > related >packages. In 2005 these hamradio packages were dropped from the >official distribution. A few hamradio operators and LINUX enthusiasts >took this packages and

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

Message: 2 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 19:35:34 +0200 From: Hans-Peter Jansen To:packman@links2linux.de Subject: Re: [packman] New packages for packman Message-ID: <5199470.tWIjIzyoY5@xrated> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Montag, 31. Juli 2017 15:31:03 Walter Fey