I'm running Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS.
The output of the command yields:
$ perl -e "print 1024 * qx{ awk '/^((Swap)?Cached|MemFree|Buffers):/{ sum +=
\\\$2 } END { print sum }' /proc/meminfo }"
528100048896
I will see if I can write a dummy Python script to reproduce my results as
you've suggested.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:55 PM wrote:
:
> I've pulled down version 20200622 as requested and reran the exact same
> command.
>
> It exits with the same error:
>
> * The version number: 20200622
> * The bugid: Less than 1 byte memory free
This error occurs (obviously) if there is less than 1
Hi all,
Sorry about the radio silence for the past month.
Thank you Shlomi. I agree with your mixed feelings of Debian and am personally
not surprised by the delay in release.
I've pulled down version 20200622 as requested and reran the exact same command.
It exits with the same error:
* The
Hi Evan!
On Fri, 29 May 2020 21:20:33 +
edowni...@protonmail.com wrote:
> I have not tried a newer version yet, but I will.
>
> This version (20161222) is what comes with Debian buster
> (https://packages.debian.org/buster/parallel). I suppose I was just assuming
> that Debian had the most
I have not tried a newer version yet, but I will.
This version (20161222) is what comes with Debian buster
(https://packages.debian.org/buster/parallel). I suppose I was just assuming
that Debian had the most up-to-date version of parallel (or at least close
enough).
Obviously I was wrong
your version number is ANCIENT. have you tried with newesr and see if bug's
still there?
> Dnia 29 maj 2020 o 19:55 edowni...@protonmail.com napisał(a): > > > Hello, >
> > I've discovered a potential bug with parallel. > > Details: > * The version
> number: 20161222 > > * The bugid: Less than 1
Hello,
I've discovered a potential bug with parallel.
Details:
* The version number: 20161222
* The bugid: Less than 1 byte free
* The command line being run: $ time parallel --memfree 50G --retries 10 -a
commands.txt 2> parallel_stderr.txt > parallel_stdout.txt
* The specific
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:48 PM, parallel-b...@pkts.ca wrote:
I have emailed the admin on that system, and apparently they normally
do have flock enabled, but after their latest reboot that flag was not
set for some reason. They'll fix that manually.
I'll see what would work for a flock
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:47:35 +0100
Ole Tange ta...@gnu.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:48 PM, parallel-b...@pkts.ca wrote:
I have emailed the admin on that system, and apparently they
normally do have flock enabled, but after their latest reboot that
flag was not set for some
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:25 AM, parallel-b...@pkts.ca wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:47:35 +0100
Ole Tange ta...@gnu.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:48 PM, parallel-b...@pkts.ca wrote:
I have emailed the admin on that system, and apparently they
normally do have flock enabled, but
10 matches
Mail list logo
