[Paraview] error when connecting to pvserver

2015-04-26 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I am trying to connect Paraview server (pvserver) to test the Paraview Catalyst example codes from GitHub account. So, i installed Paraview from source (under Centos 7.0) without any problem and then test code. The problem is that i am getting following error messages when i try to run the

Re: [Paraview] Any suggestion for work environment to run Catalyst examples ???

2015-04-30 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Andy, Thanks for your kindly help. I am little bit desperate about testing Catalyst and i could not find detailed documentation about it. If i run it without any error, i will share my experience along with step by step guide as a reference for everyone. Anyway, as i told before, i testes two

Re: [Paraview] to be sure about used hardware ...

2015-05-12 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Okay. That makes sense because i have a Threshold filter in my visualisation pipeline. If i use wavelet source then i could see the Volume Rendering Mode and it is set as Smart. So, using Threshold filter might also reduce the performance of the volume rendering. Right? Anyway, thanks for your

Re: [Paraview] problem in installing Paraview from source in MacOS

2015-04-08 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Shawn, Thanks for your help. I disabled examples but i got same error from Catalyst [ 98%] Built target CoProcessingPythonScriptExample [ 98%] Generating Documentation HTMLs from xmls Processing wiki sources Processing wiki filters Processing wiki writers Processing wiki readers [ 98%]

Re: [Paraview] Connecting to Catalyst-Enabled Simulation Running on Remote Cluster

2015-05-19 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Timo, Have you ever tried to test Catalyst examples in your case. https://github.com/Kitware/ParaViewCatalystExampleCode I am also trying to run Catalyst examples but i could not. In my case, i am able to install Paraview (4.3.1) from source under Mac OS 10.10 and the Catalys examples but

Re: [Paraview] pqPipelineSource::getOutputPort( 0 ). Available number of output ports: 0

2015-06-08 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I have also same problem in Mac OS 10.10 + python (framework) + OpenMPI (compiled with gnu compilers). I compiled both ParaView 4.3.1 and also 4.2.0 from the source but after running Catalyst Examples i am getting same port error. I might help to found the source of the problem. Regards,

Re: [Paraview] co-processing script with two datasource ...

2015-06-22 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, Thanks for your help. The driver is running with following code, datadescription = vtkCoProcessorPython.vtkCPDataDescription() datadescription.SetTimeData(time, step) datadescription.AddInput(AtmData1) cpscript.RequestDataDescription(datadescription) inputdesc1 =

[Paraview] co-processing script with two datasource ...

2015-06-20 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I am tying to run a ParaView pipeline that uses a dataset. In this case, the dataset has both three (time,y,x) and four (time,z,y,x) dimensional fields. In the pipeline, i am loading the same dataset twice (by changing dimensions in the properties window) to access different variables because

Re: [Paraview] problem in defining vtkStructuredGrid in MPI

2015-06-26 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, Thanks for your suggestion. I did it as follows, vtkMultiBlockDataSet* grid = vtkMultiBlockDataSet::New(); vtkNewvtkMultiPieceDataSet mpds; mpds-SetNumberOfPieces(*mpiSize); mpds-SetPiece(*mpiRank, sg.GetPointer()); grid-SetNumberOfBlocks(1); grid-SetBlock(0, mpds.GetPointer());

[Paraview] problem in defining vtkStructuredGrid in MPI

2015-06-26 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I am trying to create structured grid in an MPI application and i am using following C++ code to implement it extern C void createstgrid_(double* y, double* x, int* nxstart, int* nxend, int* nystart, int* nyend, int* nx, int* ny,

Re: [Paraview] PNetCDF 64 bit Error

2015-07-06 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, As i know there is a large file support option and you could select during ParaView installation. I am not sure about it's value in the binary distribution of ParaView. By the way, the NetCDF library used in the ParaView reader could only support NetCDF classic as default and you might need

Re: [Paraview] problem in defining vtkStructuredGrid in MPI

2015-06-30 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Again, Now, i have some problem when i trying to create the visualisation. I created grid as it suggested. In this case, i have multi piece data (structured grid) inside of the single block. The grid can be seen in the attached plot (plot_grid.png).In this case, it seems correct and you could

Re: [Paraview] capability of ParaView, Catalyst in distributed computing environment ...

2016-06-19 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Andy, I used first approach and fix the issue using following customised coprocessorinitializewithpython function. In this case, i converted type of communicator coming from Fortran to C using MPI_Comm_f2c call. Now, the code works without any problem. Thanks for your kindly help. extern "C"

[Paraview] reading both 2d and 3d fields from same netCDF file ...

2016-01-31 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi All, I posted this question last week but i could not get any response from the Paraview user list. I just wonder that is there any other way to create such kind of visualisation using programmable filter etc. Please refer to the following link for my previous mail

[Paraview] problem in reading both 2d and 3d fields from same file ...

2016-01-25 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I have a problem when i try to read both two and three dimensional fields form a netCDF file. To access both 2d (x and y) and 3d (level, x, and y) fields, i am reading same file twice by changing dimension combo box in properties panel. This works fine. After creating visualization pipeline

Re: [Paraview] capability of ParaView, Catalyst in distributed computing environment ...

2016-05-22 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Thanks for the information. Currently, i am working on two component case and the initial results show that grid and data information belong to each model component must be accessible by all the MPI processes (defined in global MPI_COMM_WORLD) in adaptor side. This makes the implementation very

Re: [Paraview] capability of ParaView, Catalyst in distributed computing environment ...

2016-05-18 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Yes, you are right. In this case, there will be two separate MPI_COMM_WORLD. Plus, one that covers all the resources (let's say that global MPI_COMM_WORLD). Actually, this kind of setup is very common for multi-physics applications such as fluid-structure interaction. So, is it possible to tight

Re: [Paraview] couple of issues related with co-processing ...

2016-04-16 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, You can download the Catalyst script from following link, https://www.dropbox.com/s/eajs9dm0of5b4bi/script_data.tar.gz?dl=0 I also included the data and ParaView state that is used to create the Catalyst script. So, it might help to find the problem. Thanks, --ufuk > I haven't seen

Re: [Paraview] capability of ParaView, Catalyst in distributed computing environment ...

2016-08-04 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Andy, Thanks for your help. You can find the Python script as attachment. BTW, the "coprocessorinitializewithpython" method is called by subset of processors that are supposed to do co-processing. I think that the usage of vtkCPPythonScriptPipeline is correct in this case. It is weird but it

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

2017-02-14 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Cory, I was trying to install new release candidate to test Catalyst module but i am getting following error messages under Linux (CentOS) and with Intel compiler (2016), CMake Error at VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:549 (target_compile_features): target_compile_features no known

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

2017-02-14 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I don't have access to the server right now and I could not check the cake version but probably it is 3.7.x. So, I'll try to test the newer version and i'll get back to you then (probably on Thursday). Thanks for your help. Regards, --ufuk > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:04:50 -0500, Utkarsh

[Paraview] issue about deformed and misplaced color bars ...

2017-02-17 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I was using Catalyst with 5.2 and the color bars are shown as tiny and also misplaced when it is compared with ParaView output. I also checked it with 5.3RC1 and the issue is still in there. So, is there any plan to fix it in 5.3. There ware also discussion about it in the mail list and it

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

2017-02-17 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, Yes the issue was related with make version. Actually, I was using pretty old one (cmake/3.5.2) and after upgrading it to cmake/3.7.2, the error is gone. Thanks for your help, --ufuk ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source

[Paraview] tracking an object ...

2017-02-26 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi All, I just wonder that is there anybody used following Python code with latest version of the ParaView (5.2) to track object. http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView/Python/Tracking_an_object_during_animation When i try to run the script under Python shell (after selecting object using

Re: [Paraview] GNOME is hanging with co-processing ...

2016-11-02 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Chris and Andy, It is good to know that i am not alone. It is very strange issue. Are you also using GNOME in OpenSuse? It might narrow down the issue. As i told before, if i use strace, the problem is dissapeared. It might help to find the source of the problem but it requires deep knowledge

Re: [Paraview] not all fields written by allinputsgridwriter.py ...

2016-12-09 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Thanks for your help Andy. No. Their names are "tsfc" and "psfc". In this case, I have only one input port and two fields. I could also try to test with different fields but I could do it on Monday when I have access to server. Regards, --ufuk > Are the fields uniquely named? That would be my

Re: [Paraview] Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.

2017-03-17 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Burlen, Your issue could be related with following, https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-c-compiler/topic/702934 I opened a bug report in Intel form and they found a bug in that particular source file (pqPresetToPixmap.cxx). So, if you apply the fix you might solve the problem but i

[Paraview] installation of PV 5.3.0 with Intel compiler ...

2017-03-17 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi All, Again, i am stuck into following error, CMake Error at VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:549 (target_compile_features): target_compile_features no known features for CXX compiler "Intel" version 17.0.2.20170213. Call Stack (most recent call first):

Re: [Paraview] installation of PV 5.3.0 with Intel compiler ...

2017-03-17 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
This is my fault. Sorry! After upgrading to cmake-3.8.0-rc2, it installs without any problem. --ufuk > Hi All, > > Again, i am stuck into following error, > > CMake Error at VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:549 > (target_compile_features): >target_compile_features no known features for CXX

Re: [Paraview] Wind Velocity does not match cloud movement

2017-04-22 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I think this is regional atmospheric model. Right? If this is the case, switched off spherical coordinates and add Transform filter to adjust z coordinate. This is very common problem when you want to create visualisation with earth system model components such as atmosphere and ocean. The

Re: [Paraview] Cannot generate Python state when tracing is active ...

2017-03-09 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Yes. My first reaction was same and i checked the tracing but it was not active. So, the error must be related with something else. By the way, is any particular filter could trigger this error. Is there any restriction out there when we are trying to use co-processing? Thanks, --ufuk > As the

[Paraview] Cannot generate Python state when tracing is active ...

2017-03-09 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi All, I am getting following error when i try to export visualization pipeline using co-processing plugin. I just wonder the source of the error because i could not generate python script? Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 10, in File

[Paraview] place of colormap ...

2017-03-13 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I just want to add additional color map to ParaView but I don't have access to GUI (it is installed to a cluster with NVIDIA EGL support). So, I just wonder that which file must be edited to include colormap manually. Is it lib/site-packages/paraview/ColorMaps.xml? If so I could not see my

Re: [Paraview] Cannot generate Python state when tracing is active ...

2017-03-10 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, Thanks for your help. I opened issue about that https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17270 I think that the tracing error is triggered by another one. Please see issue for detailed information. Regards, --ufuk > That's odd, that sounds like a bug. What does you pipeline

[Paraview] vector plot with multiblock dataset. possible bug or dataset issue?

2017-03-08 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi All, I have some weird observation with 5.3RC2 when i try to create visualisation of vector field that is coming from multiblock dataset (has 4x4 decomposition). The problem is that in the simple visualization pipeline such as Calculator -> Glyph, i could barely see or pick the boundaries of

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-15 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Andy, Thanks for your help and the script. Actually, I was adding input names to the script by hand. Anyway, I tested your script and it gives similar error as follows, File "/home/ext-dell-guest1/rds/hpc-work/progs/paraview-5.3.0/egl/lib/site-packages/paraview/coprocessing.py", line 305,

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-15 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, Yes. It works and produces same output. --ufuk > Hi Ufuk, > > It looks like the script line that is not working properly is: > grid = adaptorinput.GetClientSideObject().GetOutputDataObject(0) > > grid is set to None here for your build. Trying something simpler, in > pvpython can

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-15 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Without support of you and also Ben, i could not even reach to this point. Thanks again. At least, code runs now. I think that this is big improvement. Anyway, both command is working as expected, > mpirun -np 4 pvbatch > mpirun -np 4 pvbatch -sym I also tested allinputsgridwriter_new.py with

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-15 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I solved the problem and i am able to run the simulation code with Catalyst support by installing PV (5.4.0 rc4 and 5.3.0) with newer version of protobuf library (3.3.0) and compiling the model code with this version of PV (using gcc). Now, the problem is that the code gives following

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-16 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I add print statement to python script and it shows that three input port is ok but one of them is empty. The new allinputsgridwriter.py that has automatic detection of input port fail in this case but if I use old one with manual configuration of the ports (there is no definition of empty

[Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-13 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I am trying to install a code with support ParaView, Catalyst (version 5.3) to a new system. In this case, the code crash (seg. fault) at the beginning without giving any valuable hint about the problem. If I run the code under gdb I am getting following error messages, ---Type to continue,

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-14 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
It is my fault, I forgot to change coupe of variable in PV config, it seems that PV is compiling with 3.3.0. I'll try to run the code when it is installed. It seems that 2.5 is not usable with PV and old. Anyway, I'll let you know about the result. --ufuk > Hi Ben, > > Again thanks for your

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-14 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Ben, Thanks for your help. The server is Scientific Linux release 7.3 (Nitrogen) and yes i install PV from source using NVIDIA EGL libraries. In this case, I set USE_X OFF and also QT_GUI OFF. I tried both Intel (2017) and gcc and result is same. I also installed PV 5.4.1RC4 and still same. It

Re: [Paraview] Segmentation fault in protobuf

2017-08-14 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Ben, Again thanks for your help. I tried to use protobuf 3.3.0 with PV 5.4.0rc4 but i am getting following error CMake Warning at /usr/local/software/spack/develop-290617/spack/opt/spack/linux-rhel7-x86_64/gcc-5.4.0/cmake-3.8.1-hvzxbkmal

Re: [Paraview] multiple visualization pipeline at a time with co-processing

2017-07-10 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Andy, Thanks for your help. I think i found the problem. In my case, the initialization code was something like following, ... vtkSmartPointer pipeline = vtkSmartPointer::New(); for (int i = 0; i < *nscript; i++) { pipeline->Initialize(pythonScriptNames[i]);

Re: [Paraview] ParaView newbie with a (hopefully) simple question

2017-08-07 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, You can use trace feature (under Tools -> Start Trace) of ParaView to generate desired Python script with little bit modification. For example, I generated a Python script to open single pieces of multi-piece dataset and add loop to script to automatically open them, from paraview.simple

[Paraview] example code for cell data representation

2017-05-27 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, I am looking for an example C++ code that demonstrates definition of cell data in vtkStructuredGrid. I have a code that defined fields as point data but I would like to convert it to cell representation. As I know that cell data does not need to extra ghost point along the edges in