On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:54:01 +1100, you wrote:
Can you stream broadcast with Flac?
Yes, and no. Yes, because most broadcast plug-ins convert the audio
source to either MP3, Ogg Vorbis, or WMA. No, because I don't think
there's a broadcast tool that will broadcast packets in native FLAC
mode,
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 04:40:56 -0700, you wrote:
Is flac suppose to be smaller then .wav files?
Yes, they are.
Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you stream broadcast with Flac?
P.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Matzura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 04:40:56 -0700, you wrote:
Is flac
pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:50:37 -0600, you wrote:
So, if I understand you right taking audio from a cd to flac would not
improve over what was on the original cd? So, I am guessing that the flac
://www.wrightplaceinc.net
msn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Steve Matzura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:50:37 -0600, you wrote
List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:04 AM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
Coruse they are, FLAC is a form of compression, wave files are
certainly uncompressed audio.
On 06/12/2007, at 10:40 PM, Doc wrote:
Is flac suppose to be smaller then .wav files
Wright
http://www.wrightplaceinc.net
msn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Dane Trethowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:04 AM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
Coruse they are, FLAC
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:50:37 -0600, you wrote:
So, if I understand you right taking audio from a cd to flac would not
improve over what was on the original cd? So, I am guessing that the flac
format would only be worth using if you were recording original material
from a live source?
Huh?
So, how new is the Flac in Goldwave?
- Original Message -
From: Dane Trethowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 5:41 AM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
Right, well I've never played with WMA losless but now
If I have a file in *.ogg and converted it to flac how much larger would it
be percentage wise?
- Original Message -
From: Dane Trethowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 12:54 AM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak
Tanner wrote:
So, how new is the Flac in Goldwave?
- Original Message -
From: Dane Trethowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 5:41 AM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
Right, well I've never played with WMA
:54 AM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
If you want something compressed which sounds exactly like the
original then FLAC or other lossless formats are perfect for this
sort
of thing, FLAC is probably the most widely supported form of lossles
compression around but there are others
List
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:35:44 +1100, you wrote:
FLAC IS LOSSLESS SO WHAT YOU HEAR IN THE ORIGINAL IS WHAT YOU HEAR WITH
FLAC.
Well, it's supposed to be. I've never read any test reports that say what
comes out equals what went in. I can only
Discussion List
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:35:44 +1100, you wrote:
FLAC IS LOSSLESS SO WHAT YOU HEAR IN THE ORIGINAL IS WHAT YOU HEAR
WITH
FLAC.
Well, it's supposed to be. I've never read any test reports that
say what
comes out equals what went in. I can only
: Sunday, November 25, 2007 1:55 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
If you want something compressed which sounds exactly like the
original then FLAC or other lossless formats are perfect for this sort
of thing, FLAC is probably the most widely supported form
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 1:55 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
If you want something compressed which sounds exactly like the
original then FLAC or other lossless formats are perfect
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:35:44 +1100, you wrote:
FLAC IS LOSSLESS SO WHAT YOU HEAR IN THE ORIGINAL IS WHAT YOU HEAR
WITH FLAC.
Well, it's supposed to be. I've never read any test reports that say
what comes out equals what went in. I can only hope it's that way.
Audio List Help, Guidelines,
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:17:10 -0700, you wrote:
I've heard people speaking of flac but since my portable player will not play
it I
can't see going through the hastle of conversion just to upload to my ipod.
Well, if you don't have original media, like CD's, there's no need to
even worry about
Depends on how you do it I guess, In my case I have all my music
stored on DVD in Cue/FLAC pairs and I have MP3 conversions of the FLAC
stuff on my external drive, that way I can put them onto a hard drive
player, CD for one of the DVD players etc at the touch of a few
buttons. What this
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:17:10 -0700, you wrote:
I've heard people speaking of flac but since my portable player will not
play it I
can't see going
compression option. Microsoft has its own, WMA lossless and there are
others.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Tanner
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 8:51 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
So, if I
original
material
from a live source?
- Original Message -
From: Steve Matzura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:17:10 -0700, you wrote:
I've
PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Steve Matzura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: The advantages of flak?
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:37:10 -0800, you wrote:
I've been able to hear comparisons of mp3
FLAC IS LOSSLESS SO WHAT YOU HEAR IN THE ORIGINAL IS WHAT YOU HEAR
WITH FLAC.
On 23/11/2007, at 3:37 PM, albert griffith wrote:
I've been able to hear comparisons of mp3 and wma formats but not
flak. Are
there advantages of flak over either or both of these other than
some people
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:37:10 -0800, you wrote:
I've been able to hear comparisons of mp3 and wma formats but not flak. Are
there advantages of flak over either or both of these other than some people
believe it sounds better? thanks
The L in FLAC stands for lossless. Theoretically, what goes
25 matches
Mail list logo
