Dear WG,
Almost 12 years since we started the PCE WG ! More than 30 RFCs, many
re-charterings, closely working with several other WGs (MPLS, CCAMP, OSPF,
ISIS, …) and of course many implementations and deployments in the field
applying the PCE architecture to several areas !
As you might have
Dear co-authors,
First of all, my apologies for the late comments that I had promised to send a
while ago.
In your first deployment model … (although the comment below somehow applies to
the second model)
o Deployment model 1: PCC to decide adjusted bandwidth:
* In this model, the
Agreed indeed.
Thanks.
JP.
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 7:32 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>
> That looks right to me.
> Adrian
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of RFC Errata System
>> Sent: 06 December 2015 12:24
>> To:
Thanks Dhruv.
> On Oct 6, 2015, at 8:57 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
> Hi Chairs,
>
> This version refreshes the expired draft (no changes made in the content).
> The WG LC [1] was issued last year on -01. The -02 update [2] handled all the
> comments made during the
Dear AD,
Delighted to work with Detnet ! We will undoubtedly have interactions related
to path computations architectures, protocols, ...
Thanks,
JP.
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 12:52 PM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A wrote:
>
> Hi detnet fans,
>
> Great news - on today’s IESG call, we got
Dear WG,
This starts a 2-week WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-04, ending on Oct 23
at noon ET. Please send your comments to the authors and copy the list.
Thanks.
JP, Julien and Jon.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Dear WG,
There is a clear consensus: authors please resubmit as
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-00.txt, with no
other change than title, date.
Thanks.
JP.
On Sep 14, 2014, at 3:54 PM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur
Dear WG,
We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting
draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work
has considerably progressed in other WG.
Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE
WG document ?
Thanks.
JP and Julien.
Dear WG,
Both draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-02 and draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-09 are
now stable ready for WG Last Call.
This starts a 3-week WG Last call, which will end on Oct 6 at noon ET.
Please send your comments on the mailing list.
ps: this WG LC will be followed by another WG LC on
done !
On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:18 AM, Adrian Farrel adr...@olddog.co.uk wrote:
Submitted draft-ietf-pce-rfc7150bis-00.txt
Pending WG chair approval
Thanks,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) [mailto:jvass...@cisco.com]
Sent: 21 July 2014 23:00
To: Adrian
Dear WG,
Just a reminder the final agenda for the PCE WG meeting must be published by
* 2014-07-14 (Monday): Revised Working Group agendas due by UTC 23:59,
upload using IETF Meeting Materials Management
Toolhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/cgi-bin/wg/wg_proceedings.cgi.
So please let us know
PCEPS, I guess PCEP-S or PCEP-TLS would do...
Be goode,
On 11 Mar 2014, at 00:14, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote:
Dear WG,
We had a clear consensus to adopt draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG
Document as a PCE WG document.
Authors, please re-submit as draft-ietf-pce-pceps
Dear WG,
We had a clear consensus to adopt draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations
as PCE WG Document as a PCE WG document.
Authors, please re-submit as draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-00 with
no change other than document name, title and dates.
Thanks.
JP and Julien.
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had good support for
adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG
document, as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list.
Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting
draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support for
adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt
as a PCE WG.
Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting
draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as a WG document
: Margaria, Cyril (Coriant - DE/Munich) [mailto:cyril.marga...@coriant.com]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 5:34 AM
To: Ina Minei; JP Vasseur (jvasseur); Julien Meuric;
pce@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Stateful PCE applicability
Hi,
Yes we need an applicability document.
draft-zhang-pce-stateful
[mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 3:20 AM
To: Ina Minei; pce@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability
Thanks Ina - good question : WG, please voice your opinion
Thanks JP.
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Ina
Thanks Ina - good question : WG, please voice your opinion
Thanks JP.
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Ina Minei wrote:
Dear chairs and working group,
In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes stateful
PCE, we wanted to hear the opinions of the group on
1. the need
We have a consensus on this document - Authors please post a PCE WG document
(draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware), with no change other than title and date.
Thanks.
JP and Julien.
On Mar 11, 2013, at 9:13 PM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote:
Dear all,
There was a good consensus in adopting
draft
Dear all,
There was a good consensus in adopting
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-awarehttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware-05.txt
as a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing
list.
Please express your opinion Yes/No (comments welcome too).
Dear all,
There was a good consensus in adopting draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a PCE WG
document but as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list.
Please express your opinion Yes/No (comments welcome too).
Thanks.
JP and Julien.
___
Pce
Dear Jiang-san,
On Oct 15, 2012, at 4:20 AM, Peng JIANG wrote:
Dear JP,
I am one of the co-authors of draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep-
extension-l3vpn. This draft defines the PCEP extensions for the
dynamic creation of MPLS TE LSPs between BGP/MPLS IP-VPN sites.
We have been waiting for
Dear all,
The PCE WG will meet in Atlanta. Please let us not later than Oct 17 if you
would like to request a presentation slot ?
Thanks.
JP.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Dear all,
Please let Dan and the PCE WG chairs know by July 18th if you plan to request a
slot for the WG meeting (indicate the name of the document, requested time and
presenter).
Many Thanks.
JP and Julien.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
Dear all,
Please let Dan and the PCE chairs know by July 18th if you plan to request a
slot for the WG meeting (indicate the name of the document, requested time and
presenter).
Many Thanks.
JP and Julien.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
25 matches
Mail list logo