Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja, See inline... > -Original Message- > From: Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) [mailto:i...@kuehlewind.net] > Sent: 16 September 2016 17:46 > To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A > Cc: Spencer Dawkins at IETF ; Dhruv Dhody > ;

Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Dhruv, please see inline. > Am 15.09.2016 um 07:37 schrieb Dhruv Dhody : > > Hi Mirja, > > Let me thank you for the detailed review and comments. > I have tried to answer your comments, please see inline. > The working copy with all comments received during the last

Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Deborah, hi Spencer, Spencer, thanks for adding on to this. Yes, that’s where my concern comes from. I know that this only tries to use what's already done in RFC7471 (OSPF) and RFC7810 (ISIS) but the wording is used differently there. Sorry for being picky but as this is actually only a

Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Spencer, This document is on how a PCE utilizes the IGP information of RFC7471 (OSPF) and RFC7810 (ISIS). Both documents use the term “current” in their definitions. And also use “actual”. For this document, we don’t want to re-invent terms/definitions for already defined IGP information.

Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Deborah/Dhruv, On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:03 AM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A wrote: > Hi Mirja, > > Yes, thanks Mirja for you detailed review. > > As Dhruv noted, this is not representing an average utilization, but the > current bandwidth utilization. As Dhruv noted, we could swap

Re: [Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja, Yes, thanks Mirja for you detailed review. As Dhruv noted, this is not representing an average utilization, but the current bandwidth utilization. As Dhruv noted, we could swap this sentence in the Abstract for the term later used in section 4.2.2 "actual". For me, though, current