Re: [Pce] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-10

Thanks Will, good catch for the nits. Have fixed in v-11 https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-11 -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Will LIU via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2022年9月16日 14:56 收件人: ops-...@ietf.org 抄送:

Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2021年8月27日 21:27 收件人: Tero Kivinen ; Yaron Sheffer 抄送: Qin Wu ; tom petch ; draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org 主题: Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05 Hi Tero, I see the review is now marked "Comp

Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

Thanks Yaron. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Yaron Sheffer [mailto:yaronf.i...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2021年8月17日 15:15 收件人: Qin Wu ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; tom petch ; sec...@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org 主题: Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce

Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

4:33 收件人: Qin Wu ; tom petch ; Yaron Sheffer ; sec...@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org 主题: Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05 Hi Qin, Can you publish a revision so that Yaron assure it satisfies his comments

Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

Thanks Acee and Tom for good suggestion, we will take them into account. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2021年8月12日 1:18 收件人: tom petch ; Yaron Sheffer ; Qin Wu ; sec...@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org 主题: Re

Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

replace or obsolete RFC 5304. Both RFC 's have their uses. Please be sure to reference both RFCs in your updated text. Thanx. Les > -Original Message- > From: Qin Wu > Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 6:13 PM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Yaron Sheffer > ; sec...@iet

Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

The proposed change sounds good to me, Thanks Yaron. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Yaron Sheffer [mailto:yaronf.i...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2021年8月10日 21:58 收件人: Qin Wu ; sec...@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; l...@ietf.org 主题: Re: Secdir last

Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

D TLV, if this information can make the PCEP session less secure then the operator should take that into consideration. " If you better wording, please let me know. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Yaron Sheffer [mailto:yaronf.i...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2021年8月10日 19:26 收件人: Qin Wu ; sec...@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ie

Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

Hi, Yaron -邮件原件- >发件人: Yaron Sheffer [mailto:yaronf.i...@gmail.com] >发送时间: 2021年8月9日 21:44 >收件人: Qin Wu ; sec...@ietf.org >抄送: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org; >last-c...@ietf.org; l...@ietf.org >主题: Re: Secdir last call review of >draft-i

Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

is implementation specific. Operator will make their choice. So I think I tend to agree to use SHOULD for client behavior. Thanks. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2021年8月9日 23:36 收件人: Yaron Sheffer ; Qin Wu ; sec...@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-lsr-pce

Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

Thanks Yaron for valuable comments, please see my reply inline below. -邮件原件- >发件人: Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] >发送时间: 2021年8月6日 3:25 >收件人: sec...@ietf.org >抄送: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org; >last-c...@ietf.org; l...@ietf.org >主题:

Re: [Pce] [Lsr] WG Last Call for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05

Hi, Acee Thanks for valuable comments, see reply inline below. 发件人: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Acee Lindem (acee) 发送时间: 2021年7月22日 23:11 收件人: Acee Lindem (acee) ; l...@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-supp...@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for IGP extension for

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

Support publication of this draft. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Aijun Wang 发送时间: 2019年12月9日 16:22 收件人: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] 答复: WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling Yes/Support. This draft gives operators the

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

Support. -Qin From: Pce mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 11:47 AM To: pce@ietf.org mailto:pce@ietf.org>>

Re: [Pce] Fw: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

I am not aware of any other IPR besides one that has already been disclosed by Huaimo. -Qin From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan mailto:h...@netflix.com>> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 12:12 PM To: Huaimo Chen mailto:huaimo.c...@futurewei.com>>; Zhuangyan (Yan)

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt

I Support the publication. -Qin 吴钦 Qin Mobile：+86-13914734360(Mobile Number) Email：bill...@huawei.com 发件人： Jonathan Hardwickmailto:Jonathan.Hardwick=40metaswitch@dmarc.ietf.org>> 收件人： Dhruv

Re: [Pce] [Lsr] Solicit feedback on draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-01

件人: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] 发送时间: 2019年8月21日 0:40 收件人: Qin Wu ; pce@ietf.org; l...@ietf.org 主题: RE: [Lsr] Solicit feedback on draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-01 Hi Qin, I didn't see any response to this email, so I thought I should chip in with some (old, old

[Pce] Solicit feeback on draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-01

rk item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. > > Title : IGP extension for PCEP security capability support > in the PCE > discovery > Authors : Diego R. Lopez > Qin Wu >

Re: [Pce] [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-00

I am happy to update RFC5088 and RFC5089 to allow advertisement of additional PCE information carried in the Router Capability TLV if this is the agreement. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2018年11月16日 21:18 收件人: Qin Wu; julien.meu...@orange.com; l

Re: [Pce] [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

It seems there was one relevant IPR https://patents.google.com/patent/US8127129B2/en but I am not sure it is applicable. I will consult with our IPR people to check on this. -Qin 发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2018年11月16日 11:59 收件人:

Re: [Pce] [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-00

Working on this. Try to figure out how to carry key name in PCED sub-TLV. It looks RFC5088 and RFC5089 doesn't allow add additional sub-TLVs. " RFC5088 No additional sub-TLVs will be added to the PCED TLV in the future. If a future application requires the advertisement of additional PCE

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

+1, Yes,/support. 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 li zhenqiang 发送时间: 2018年6月5日 13:44 收件人: pce 主题: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01 Yes, support. The requirement language in this doc SHOULD be capitalized.

Re: [Pce] WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group

Support. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Julien Meuric 发送时间: 2018年2月1日 22:10 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group Hi all, This message initiates a 2-week WG last call for draft-ietf-pce-association-group-04. Please review and share

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pceps-18.txt

ne Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. > > > > Title : Secure Transport for PCEP > > Authors : Diego R. Lopez > > Oscar Gon

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-05

+1 Yes/Support -Qin 发件人: Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com] 发送时间: 2017年6月19日 17:20 收件人: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Jonathan Hardwick'; pce@ietf.org 抄送: draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-schedul...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org 主题: RE: [Pce] Poll for adoption:

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce

Yes/Support. -Qin 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Zhenghaomian 发送时间: 2017年6月2日 11:04 收件人: Jonathan Hardwick; pce@ietf.org 抄送: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-h...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] 答复: Poll for adoption: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce Yes/Support. Best wishes,

Re: [Pce] Final IPR check for draft-ietf-pce-pceps

I am not aware of any IPR that is applicable to this draft . -Qin 发件人: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com] 发送时间: 2017年4月11日 12:51 收件人: draft-ietf-pce-pc...@ietf.org 抄送: Cyril Margaria; pce@ietf.org 主题: Final IPR check for draft-ietf-pce-pceps Dear authors Could you

[Pce] Update of draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-11

Hi, All: Didn't get time to introduce PCEP extension for SFC support: Here is the update of draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-11, https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/slides/slides-98-pce-42-pcep-extensions-for-sfc-00.pdf This

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-11.txt

-邮件原件- 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2017年3月9日 17:00 收件人: Christian Jacquenet; Dhruv Dhody; Qin Wu; Mohamed Boucadair; Jeff Tantsura 主题: New Version Notification for draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-11.txt A new version of I-D, draft-wu-pce

Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-association-policy

Support. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Daniele Ceccarelli 发送时间: 2016年11月28日 22:31 收件人: Leeyoung; Julien Meuric 抄送: pce@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-association-policy Support, BR Daniele > -Original Message- > From: Pce

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Support. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Julien Meuric 发送时间: 2016年8月12日 17:43 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 Hi all, During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear consensus in the room on the interest for

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09

Support -Qin From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com] Sent: 28 June 2016 22:29 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] NEXT STEP of draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc

meeting . It provides a solution to SFC control plane requirements defined in draft-ietf-sfc-control-plane. We believe it is ready for WG Adoption, and we’d like to request it be considered as an SFC document with an adoption call. -Qin 发件人: Qin Wu 发送时间: 2015年12月23日 15:25 收件人: pce@ietf.org

[Pce] NEXT STEP of draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc

Hi, folks: If you didn't follow the discussion on SFC mailing list, I like to draw your attention that SFC control plane architecture adopted as a WG draft in August 2015 triggered a lot of SFC control plane requirements discussions that are related to draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-07.

Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc

FYI. 发件人: Qin Wu 发送时间: 2015年3月17日 12:01 收件人: 'Ron Parker' 抄送: Dhruv Dhody 主题: RE: Comments on draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc Hi, Ron: Thanks for your valuable comments. See my reply inline. -Qin 发件人: Ron Parker [mailto:ron_par...@affirmednetworks.com] 发送时间: 2015年3月17日 5:32 收件人: Qin Wu 主题

Re: [Pce] [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-06.txt

Hi, Hao: Thanks for your interests and valuable cmments. See my reply inline below. -Qin 发件人: sfc [mailto:sfc-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Hao Wang 发送时间: 2015年3月13日 21:06 收件人: sfc 主题: Re: [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-06.txt Hi: I have read this draft and think

Re: [Pce] Review of draft-dw-pce-service-segment-routing

人: Francesco Fondelli 抄送: Qin Wu; Dhruv Dhody 主题: Re: [Pce] Hi Francesco, Good to hear from you! On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Francesco Fondelli francesco.fonde...@gmail.com wrote: ah BTW I am reading draft-dw-pce-service-segment-routing-01, I have a comment. Thus Service-SID MUST

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-06.txt

! Regards! -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2015年3月5日 10:18 收件人: Qin Wu; Qin Wu; Jeff Tantsura; Dhruv Dhody; Christian Jacquenet; Dhruv Dhody; Mohamed Boucadair; Christian Jacquenet; Jeff Tantsura; Mohamed Boucadair 主题: New Version Notification

Re: [Pce] Adding Service in draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing

, 2014 11:49 PM To: Siva Sivabalan (msiva); Jan Medved (jmedved); Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil); edward.cra...@gmail.com; rob...@raszuk.net; vlo...@tid.es; Jeff Tantsura Cc: Dhruv Dhody; Qin Wu; JP Vasseur; Julien Meuric Subject: Adding Service in draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing Hi Authors

Re: [Pce] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-inter-domain-lsp-00.txt

Looks like a bug in the IETF submission tools. Regards! -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 julien.meu...@orange.com 发送时间: 2014年11月8日 0:47 收件人: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-inter-domain-...@tools.ietf.org 抄送: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Fwd: I-D Action:

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-05.txt

Extensions for traffic steering support in Service Function Chaining Authors : Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Mohamed Boucadair Christian Jacquenet Jeff Tantsura Filename: draft

Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document

Support. Regards! -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur) 发送时间: 2014年9月14日 18:06 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-dw-pce-service-segment-routing-00.txt

Hi,folks: Here is a new draft to discuss PCEP Extensions for service segment used in Segment Routing. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dw-pce-service-segment-routing-00 It extends SR-TE path defined in

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-discovery-pceps-support-01.txt

-邮件原件- 发件人: Uma Chunduri [mailto:uma.chund...@ericsson.com] 发送时间: 2014年8月29日 22:48 收件人: Qin Wu; pce@ietf.org 主题: RE: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-discovery-pceps-support-01.txt Hi Qin, In-line === IMO, keeping separate is good as scope is different in both. I and Diego had

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-discovery-pceps-support-01.txt

support in the PCE discovery Authors : Diego R. Lopez Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Daniel King Filename: draft-wu-pce-discovery-pceps-support-01.txt Pages : 6 Date

[Pce] 转发: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-06.txt

-Drafts directories. Title : Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery using Domain Name System(DNS) Authors : Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Daniel King Diego R. Lopez Jeff

[Pce] 答复: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-questions-04

Hi: I have reviewed draft-ietf-pce-questions-04 and had a few comments to bellows : 1. Section 19, second paragraph says: There is a subtle distinction between an NMS and an Active PCE with LSP delegation. An NMS is in control of the LSPs in the network and can request that they are

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document?

Support. -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Julien Meuric 发送时间: 2014年3月5日 2:12 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document? Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we had some support for adopting

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Support. -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Zafar Ali (zali) 发送时间: 2014年3月4日 22:22 收件人: JP Vasseur (jvasseur); pce@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ? Hi- Support (as a co-author). Thanks Regards Š

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-05.txt

: Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Daniel King Diego R. Lopez Jeff Tantsura Filename: draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-05.txt Pages : 23 Date: 2014-03-03

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-discovery-pceps-support-00.txt

: Diego R. Lopez Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Daniel King Filename: draft-wu-pce-discovery-pceps-support-00.txt Pages : 12 Date: 2014-02-10 Abstract: When a Path Computation

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc-03.txt

Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : PCEP Extensions for traffic steering support in Service Function Chaining Authors : Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Mohamed Boucadair

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-pcep-link-bw-utilization-01.txt

Protocol (PCEP) for handling Link Bandwidth Utilization Authors : Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Stefano Previdi Filename: draft-wu-pce-pcep-link-bw-utilization-01.txt Pages : 15 Date: 2014-01-08

Re: [Pce] [dnssd] Solicit feedback to draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-03

2. For TXT record, it seems you split it into multiple records, and put each key/value pair into a different record. This is not necessary. [Qin]: can multiple records be carried in one DNS message? In addition, per RFC 6763, the key should not be more than 9 character long, and no space

Re: [Pce] [dnssd] Solicit feedback to draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-03

Hi,Yi: Thank for your valuable feedback. Please see my reply inline below. Regards! -Qin From: Yi Yang (yiya) [mailto:y...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:21 AM To: Qin Wu; dn...@ietf.org; chesh...@apple.com Cc: pce@ietf.org; Daniel King; julien.meu...@orange.com Subject: Re

Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03

Support. -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:14 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 Hi all. Following the opposition

Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-03

Support. -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:18 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-03 Hi again. Following the support

[Pce] Solicit review to draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-03

send your comments to either the list or directly to us. Regards! -Qin Wu ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] Solicit feedback to draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-03

your comments to either the list or directly to us. Regards! -Qin Wu ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lopez-pce-hpce-ted-00.txt

I think intra-domain information is referred to the information gathered within parent domain rather than information collected within each child domain. Inter-domain information is referred to the inter-child domain TE links information. In this way, there will be no confliction between

Re: [Pce] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lopez-pce-hpce-ted-00.txt

Interesting draft. I believe Relying on BGP-LS to populate TE information to external PCE TED in H-PCE scenario is a straightforward approach. I am wondering how to populate TE performance information to TED in H-PCE scenario?

Re: [Pce] Bandwidth Utilization Encoding in PCEP (was RE: Bandwidth: Comments on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-08)

From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 3:59 PM To: Qin Wu; Margaria, Cyril (Coriant - DE/Munich); He, Peng; Fatai Zhang; adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Ramon Casellas'; 'Jonathan Hardwick'; pce@ietf.org Subject: Bandwidth Utilization Encoding in PCEP (was RE: [Pce] Bandwidth: Comments

[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-wu-pce-pcep-link-bw-utilization-00.txt

(PCEP) for handling Link Bandwidth Utilization Author(s) : Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Stefano Previdi Filename: draft-wu-pce-pcep-link-bw-utilization-00.txt Pages : 12 Date: 2013-10-14

Re: [Pce] A comment regarding domain diversity in draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions

Sounds reasonable, I am wondering whether it is sufficient for just defining one new 'D' flag in the SVEC object? Why 'D' flag was not defined when RFC5440 was documented. How do I know computed paths don't have any transit domains in common. Domain diversity is more complicated when computed

Re: [Pce] A comment regarding domain diversity in draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions

Hi, Qilei: For domain diversity, when path computation traverses multiple domains including one ingress domain, multiple transit domains, one egress domain, there are several cases: a. Computation path share none of these domains. b. Computation path only shares both ingress domain

Re: [Pce] A comment regarding domain diversity in draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions

believe SVEC tuple is also applied to other use cases Otherwise why RFC5440 specify it In more generic way. Regards! -Qin From: Ramon Casellas [mailto:ramon.casel...@cttc.es] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 3:49 PM To: Qin Wu Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] A comment regarding domain diversity

Re: [Pce] A comment regarding domain diversity in draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions

Qilei: I think (b) more makes sense. Maybe we further requires both egress node and ingress node belong to multiple domains. Regards! -Qin From: wang.qi...@zte.com.cn [mailto:wang.qi...@zte.com.cn] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:25 PM To: Qin Wu; Ramon Casellas Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: RE

[Pce] 答复: Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04

Support this draft. Regards! -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Julien Meuric 发送时间: 2013年8月1日 17:31 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-hierarchy-extensions-04 Hi again. Following the poll in the room during yesterday

Re: [Pce] Proposal on securing PCEP by means of TLS

Hi,Diego: Very interesting draft. TLS seems to bring more benefit for key management. Would it be good to discuss securing PCEP by TCP-AO as well since TCP-MD5 has been obsoleted by TCP-AO? Also it is better to discuss how TLS/TCP can be used to deal with Vulnerabilities concerns raised in

Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-00

Hi,Claire: You raise a good point. We will try to highlight this in the draft. Thank you very much! Regards! -Qin From: Claire Bi [mailto:b...@sttri.com.cn] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 3:57 PM To: Qin Wu Cc: pce Subject: Comments on draft-wu-pce-dns-pce-discovery-00 Hi Qin, I've reviewed