-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org; d...@dhruvdhody.com
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi Cheng,
Thanks for your response.
For the objects of intended-attribute-list and actual-attribute-list, I didn't
treat them as mandatory ones. But just think
CC ?
Regards,
PSF
Original
From: ChengLi
To: 彭少富10053815;
Cc: pce@ietf.org ;pce-cha...@ietf.org
;draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
;Dhruv Dhody
;
Date: 2024年03月13日 11:35
Subject: RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi Shaofu,
Many thanks for
Subject: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi WG,
The WGLC is closed. Thanks for everyone's comments and feedback. The I-D is on
agenda for IETF 119 to discuss the resolution for comments received.
The authors should update the draft based on the comment received and we will
take
] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi Samuel,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 6:44 PM Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
mailto:ssi...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi Cheng,
Thanks a lot for your responses. Ack for all of them, new proposed version
looks fine to me.
For “3.1 STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV s
Hi WG,
The WGLC is closed. Thanks for everyone's comments and feedback. The I-D is
on agenda for IETF 119 to discuss the resolution for comments received.
The authors should update the draft based on the comment received and we
will take the draft forward.
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
On Thu, Mar 7,
eng Li
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 13, 2024 4:46 AM
> *To:* Samuel Sidor (ssidor) ;
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
> *Cc:* pce-chairs ; pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody <
> d...@dhruvdhody.com>
> *Subject:* RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-
Hi All,
I have read the latest version and support the publication of this
draft.
Best regards
Xinxin Yi
Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Dhruv Dhody Thu, 07 March 2024 10:22 UTCShow
header<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/?q=draft-ietf-
Hi folks,
I support the WG LC of this document and think it ready for publication.
Best regards
Chongfeng
From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: 2024-02-21 17:32
To: pce@ietf.org
CC: pce-chairs; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi WG
...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi WG,
This email starts a 3-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07.html
Please indicate your support or concern
Cc: pce-chairs ; pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody
Subject: RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi Samuel,
Many thanks for your quick review and support,.
Please see our reply below.
BTW, we post the proposed update to address your comments and Shaofu’s comments
in Github
for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi WG,
This email starts a 3-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07.html
Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed
Hi WG,
I have read through this draft. The extensions are simple and efficient. I
support that it is ready to be published.
Cheers,
Mao
发件人: Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2024年2月21日 17:33
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
主题: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce
;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi WG,
This email starts a 3-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07.html
Please
: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 11:00 PM
To: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ; pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody
Subject: RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi authors of this draft,
I support this draft, but I still have a few minor comments:
1
DhruvDhody mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>>
To: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org> mailto:pce@ietf.org>>;
Cc: pce-chairs
mailto:pce-cha...@ietf.org>>;draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org>
Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 10:33 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi WG,
This email starts a 3-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-statef
: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi WG,
This email starts a 3-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07.html
Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you
, 2024 5:33 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi WG,
This email starts a 3-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft
Hi WG,
Considering this is a busy time just before the IETF meeting, we are
extending the WGLC for a week. Please respond by Thursday March 14th. It is
important to be explicitly vocal during the last call and we request you to
please respond to this thread.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024
E mode, which naturally
includes delegation). But this paragraph makes P flag no longer obeyed by PCE,
which is confusing. Maybe I misunderstood.
Regards,
PSF
Original
From: DhruvDhody
To: pce@ietf.org ;
Cc: pce-chairs
;draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
;
Date: 2024年02月21日 17:33
Subjec
Hi WG,
This email starts a 3-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07.html
Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed
to the progression of the draft to RFC,
21 matches
Mail list logo
