Re: [Pce] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:aamelni...@fastmail.fm] > > Sent: 03 August 2017 19:24 > > To: Dhruv Dhody ; The IESG > > Cc:

[Pce] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pceps-15: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

Re: [Pce] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > > > *From:* Eric Rescorla [mailto:e...@rtfm.com] > *Sent:* 07 August 2017 20:54 > *To:* Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com> > *Cc:* Alexey Melnikov <aamelni...@fastma

[Pce] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

[Pce] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with DISCUSS)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

[Pce] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [Pce] EKR Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-pceps (was RE: Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT))

I'd like to hear from the AD and chairs here. It seems to me that the design I am suggesting is better, and if the primary argument is that the editors don't want to make the change at this date, that's not very strong. Conversely, I agree that this is a WG decision, so if you're telling me that

Re: [Pce] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with DISCUSS)

basic security measure for TCP connections for routing protocols -Ekr On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eric Rescorla > &

Re: [Pce] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with COMMENT)

ing path setup type) and Error-Value = 2 (Mismatched path > >setup type) and close the PCEP session. > > > > Best regards > > Jon > > > > > > *From:* Eric Rescorla [mailto:e...@rtfm.com] > *Sent:* 04 April 2018 19:28 > *To:* Julien Meuric <

Re: [Pce] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04: (with DISCUSS)

xp-codepoints-05.txt > Diff: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce- > pcep-exp-codepoints-04=https://raw.githubusercontent. > com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-pcep- > exp-codepoints-05.txt > > Thanks! > Dhruv > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:15 PM,

[Pce] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [Pce] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04: (with DISCUSS)

Hi Adrian, Thanks for your thoughts. On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 4:58 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > The purpose of this document is to adjust the registries to allow > experimentation, not to redefine or refine the meaning of Experimental > codepoints. > > We do draw out the

Re: [Pce] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04: (with DISCUSS)

n your document which does so), I'll remove my DISCUSS. -Ekr > > There is nothing new here! Nothing new in this document. Nothing to see, > move along now. > > > > Adrian > > > > *From:* Eric Rescorla [mailto:e...@rtfm.com] > *Sent:* 08 January 2018 13:19 &g

[Pce] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04: (with DISCUSS)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

[Pce] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [Pce] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-09: (with COMMENT)

an ignored TLV is similar to an absent TLV, and > implies the only existing method before this I-D, i.e. X == RSVP-TE > signaling (cf. Martin's comment). > > Thanks, > > Julien > > > Apr. 04, 2018 - e...@rtfm.com: > > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot posi